A randomised controlled trial of Spiritual Healing in restricted neck movement

S. F. Gerard, Blair Hamilton Smith, J. A. Simpson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical effectiveness of visiting a spiritual healer in restricted neck movement.

Design: Pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Setting/Location: Spiritual-healing clinic in Aberdeen, Scotland.

Subjects: Sixty-eight (68) volunteers over the age of 18 years with restricted neck movement not currently receiving spiritual healing.

Intervention: Three weekly sessions of spiritual healing treatment lasting approximately 30 minutes each. Control group received normal care (no spiritual healing).

Outcome measures: Range of neck movement in three directions. Visual analog scales of pain and overall well-being, Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey general health questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Chronic Pain Grade were also measured.

Results: After treatment, the change from baseline in rotation and flexion-extension was significantly greater in the treatment group compared to the control group (mean standard deviation [SD]: 26.3 degrees (21.0 degrees) versus 2.1 degrees (15.1 degrees), p < 0.001 and 20.7 degrees (23.0 degrees) versus -0.03 degrees (15.2 degrees), p <0.001, respectively). Subjects from the treatment group were also observed to have reduced their pain severity scores after 3 weeks of treatment compared to those of the control group (median change from baseline [range], -2.25 [-8, 2] versus 0 (-6, 4), p = 0.03). For SF-36, the treatment group had significantly improved their scores more than the control group for physical function and energy and vitality. There was a shift in the treatment group toward milder chronic pain grades but this was not significant. There were no significant differences between treatment and control groups in the other outcome measures.

Conclusion: This study tentatively supports the effectiveness of visiting a spiritual healer in restricted neck movement. However, larger studies over longer periods, with placebo interventions, are required for corroboration and to gauge the scale of treatment effect.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)467-478
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Keywords

  • chronic pain
  • complementary medicine
  • questionnaire
  • therapies
  • efficacy
  • SF-36

Cite this

A randomised controlled trial of Spiritual Healing in restricted neck movement. / Gerard, S. F.; Smith, Blair Hamilton; Simpson, J. A.

In: Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2003, p. 467-478.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gerard, S. F. ; Smith, Blair Hamilton ; Simpson, J. A. / A randomised controlled trial of Spiritual Healing in restricted neck movement. In: Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2003 ; Vol. 9, No. 4. pp. 467-478.
@article{888a1d5a67e94100b1d87e92295e9721,
title = "A randomised controlled trial of Spiritual Healing in restricted neck movement",
abstract = "Objective: To investigate the clinical effectiveness of visiting a spiritual healer in restricted neck movement.Design: Pragmatic randomized controlled trial.Setting/Location: Spiritual-healing clinic in Aberdeen, Scotland.Subjects: Sixty-eight (68) volunteers over the age of 18 years with restricted neck movement not currently receiving spiritual healing.Intervention: Three weekly sessions of spiritual healing treatment lasting approximately 30 minutes each. Control group received normal care (no spiritual healing).Outcome measures: Range of neck movement in three directions. Visual analog scales of pain and overall well-being, Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey general health questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Chronic Pain Grade were also measured.Results: After treatment, the change from baseline in rotation and flexion-extension was significantly greater in the treatment group compared to the control group (mean standard deviation [SD]: 26.3 degrees (21.0 degrees) versus 2.1 degrees (15.1 degrees), p < 0.001 and 20.7 degrees (23.0 degrees) versus -0.03 degrees (15.2 degrees), p <0.001, respectively). Subjects from the treatment group were also observed to have reduced their pain severity scores after 3 weeks of treatment compared to those of the control group (median change from baseline [range], -2.25 [-8, 2] versus 0 (-6, 4), p = 0.03). For SF-36, the treatment group had significantly improved their scores more than the control group for physical function and energy and vitality. There was a shift in the treatment group toward milder chronic pain grades but this was not significant. There were no significant differences between treatment and control groups in the other outcome measures.Conclusion: This study tentatively supports the effectiveness of visiting a spiritual healer in restricted neck movement. However, larger studies over longer periods, with placebo interventions, are required for corroboration and to gauge the scale of treatment effect.",
keywords = "chronic pain, complementary medicine, questionnaire, therapies, efficacy, SF-36",
author = "Gerard, {S. F.} and Smith, {Blair Hamilton} and Simpson, {J. A.}",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1089/107555303322284758",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "467--478",
journal = "Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine",
issn = "1075-5535",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomised controlled trial of Spiritual Healing in restricted neck movement

AU - Gerard, S. F.

AU - Smith, Blair Hamilton

AU - Simpson, J. A.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Objective: To investigate the clinical effectiveness of visiting a spiritual healer in restricted neck movement.Design: Pragmatic randomized controlled trial.Setting/Location: Spiritual-healing clinic in Aberdeen, Scotland.Subjects: Sixty-eight (68) volunteers over the age of 18 years with restricted neck movement not currently receiving spiritual healing.Intervention: Three weekly sessions of spiritual healing treatment lasting approximately 30 minutes each. Control group received normal care (no spiritual healing).Outcome measures: Range of neck movement in three directions. Visual analog scales of pain and overall well-being, Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey general health questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Chronic Pain Grade were also measured.Results: After treatment, the change from baseline in rotation and flexion-extension was significantly greater in the treatment group compared to the control group (mean standard deviation [SD]: 26.3 degrees (21.0 degrees) versus 2.1 degrees (15.1 degrees), p < 0.001 and 20.7 degrees (23.0 degrees) versus -0.03 degrees (15.2 degrees), p <0.001, respectively). Subjects from the treatment group were also observed to have reduced their pain severity scores after 3 weeks of treatment compared to those of the control group (median change from baseline [range], -2.25 [-8, 2] versus 0 (-6, 4), p = 0.03). For SF-36, the treatment group had significantly improved their scores more than the control group for physical function and energy and vitality. There was a shift in the treatment group toward milder chronic pain grades but this was not significant. There were no significant differences between treatment and control groups in the other outcome measures.Conclusion: This study tentatively supports the effectiveness of visiting a spiritual healer in restricted neck movement. However, larger studies over longer periods, with placebo interventions, are required for corroboration and to gauge the scale of treatment effect.

AB - Objective: To investigate the clinical effectiveness of visiting a spiritual healer in restricted neck movement.Design: Pragmatic randomized controlled trial.Setting/Location: Spiritual-healing clinic in Aberdeen, Scotland.Subjects: Sixty-eight (68) volunteers over the age of 18 years with restricted neck movement not currently receiving spiritual healing.Intervention: Three weekly sessions of spiritual healing treatment lasting approximately 30 minutes each. Control group received normal care (no spiritual healing).Outcome measures: Range of neck movement in three directions. Visual analog scales of pain and overall well-being, Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey general health questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Chronic Pain Grade were also measured.Results: After treatment, the change from baseline in rotation and flexion-extension was significantly greater in the treatment group compared to the control group (mean standard deviation [SD]: 26.3 degrees (21.0 degrees) versus 2.1 degrees (15.1 degrees), p < 0.001 and 20.7 degrees (23.0 degrees) versus -0.03 degrees (15.2 degrees), p <0.001, respectively). Subjects from the treatment group were also observed to have reduced their pain severity scores after 3 weeks of treatment compared to those of the control group (median change from baseline [range], -2.25 [-8, 2] versus 0 (-6, 4), p = 0.03). For SF-36, the treatment group had significantly improved their scores more than the control group for physical function and energy and vitality. There was a shift in the treatment group toward milder chronic pain grades but this was not significant. There were no significant differences between treatment and control groups in the other outcome measures.Conclusion: This study tentatively supports the effectiveness of visiting a spiritual healer in restricted neck movement. However, larger studies over longer periods, with placebo interventions, are required for corroboration and to gauge the scale of treatment effect.

KW - chronic pain

KW - complementary medicine

KW - questionnaire

KW - therapies

KW - efficacy

KW - SF-36

U2 - 10.1089/107555303322284758

DO - 10.1089/107555303322284758

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 467

EP - 478

JO - Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

JF - Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

SN - 1075-5535

IS - 4

ER -