A randomized controlled trial of direct access for laparoscopic sterilization

L. McKessock, Blair Hamilton Smith, Anthony Scott, Wendy Jane Graham, Peter Terry, Alexander Allan Templeton, Ann Elizabeth Fitzmaurice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. The aim of this study was to establish and evaluate a direct access service for laparoscopic sterilization.

Methods. A pragmatic randomized controlled trial was carried out on a total of 232 women referred to Aberdeen Royal Infirmary for sterilization between 1 June 1996 and 31 March 1997, from 57 general practices around Aberdeen, Scotland, comprising 75 from general practices that had received criteria for direct access, and 157 from control practices. The main outcome measures were: patients' waiting times to appointments and operation, satisfaction, short-term regret, operative complications and costs; conjoint analysis of patient preferences; GPs' adherence to referral criteria; GP and gynaecologist satisfaction; and NHS costs.

Results. Analysis was by intention to treat. There were no inappropriate direct referrals. Waiting time was lower in the intervention group, but there were more visits post-operatively to the GP. Patient and doctor satisfaction was equally high in both groups. There was no difference in operative complication rate, nor in total cost to patients or to the NHS. GPs and gynaecologists strongly supported direct access, but women preferred to meet both a gynaecologist and a GP before sterilization (routine referral). Other attributes of care important to patients included written information, although waiting time was not important. Of all women referred for sterilization during the study period, only 31% were suitable for direct referral.

Conclusions. Patients preferred routine referral, and there were no differences in patient costs or satisfaction. There was, however, strong medical support for direct referral. Restrictive direct referral criteria may limit the uptake. These findings are important for future planning of direct referral services. Important methodological lessons were also learnt about the conduct of trials involving the primary-secondary care interface.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages7
JournalFamily Practice
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Keywords

  • conjoint analysis
  • direct access
  • direct referral
  • laparoscopic sterilization
  • randomized controlled trial
  • HEALTH-CARE

Cite this

McKessock, L., Smith, B. H., Scott, A., Graham, W. J., Terry, P., Templeton, A. A., & Fitzmaurice, A. E. (2001). A randomized controlled trial of direct access for laparoscopic sterilization. Family Practice, 18(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/18.1.1

A randomized controlled trial of direct access for laparoscopic sterilization. / McKessock, L.; Smith, Blair Hamilton; Scott, Anthony; Graham, Wendy Jane; Terry, Peter; Templeton, Alexander Allan; Fitzmaurice, Ann Elizabeth.

In: Family Practice, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2001, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McKessock, L, Smith, BH, Scott, A, Graham, WJ, Terry, P, Templeton, AA & Fitzmaurice, AE 2001, 'A randomized controlled trial of direct access for laparoscopic sterilization', Family Practice, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/18.1.1
McKessock, L. ; Smith, Blair Hamilton ; Scott, Anthony ; Graham, Wendy Jane ; Terry, Peter ; Templeton, Alexander Allan ; Fitzmaurice, Ann Elizabeth. / A randomized controlled trial of direct access for laparoscopic sterilization. In: Family Practice. 2001 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 1-8.
@article{3469f6da81914910b8093f263a1ff80d,
title = "A randomized controlled trial of direct access for laparoscopic sterilization",
abstract = "Objectives. The aim of this study was to establish and evaluate a direct access service for laparoscopic sterilization.Methods. A pragmatic randomized controlled trial was carried out on a total of 232 women referred to Aberdeen Royal Infirmary for sterilization between 1 June 1996 and 31 March 1997, from 57 general practices around Aberdeen, Scotland, comprising 75 from general practices that had received criteria for direct access, and 157 from control practices. The main outcome measures were: patients' waiting times to appointments and operation, satisfaction, short-term regret, operative complications and costs; conjoint analysis of patient preferences; GPs' adherence to referral criteria; GP and gynaecologist satisfaction; and NHS costs.Results. Analysis was by intention to treat. There were no inappropriate direct referrals. Waiting time was lower in the intervention group, but there were more visits post-operatively to the GP. Patient and doctor satisfaction was equally high in both groups. There was no difference in operative complication rate, nor in total cost to patients or to the NHS. GPs and gynaecologists strongly supported direct access, but women preferred to meet both a gynaecologist and a GP before sterilization (routine referral). Other attributes of care important to patients included written information, although waiting time was not important. Of all women referred for sterilization during the study period, only 31{\%} were suitable for direct referral.Conclusions. Patients preferred routine referral, and there were no differences in patient costs or satisfaction. There was, however, strong medical support for direct referral. Restrictive direct referral criteria may limit the uptake. These findings are important for future planning of direct referral services. Important methodological lessons were also learnt about the conduct of trials involving the primary-secondary care interface.",
keywords = "conjoint analysis, direct access, direct referral, laparoscopic sterilization, randomized controlled trial, HEALTH-CARE",
author = "L. McKessock and Smith, {Blair Hamilton} and Anthony Scott and Graham, {Wendy Jane} and Peter Terry and Templeton, {Alexander Allan} and Fitzmaurice, {Ann Elizabeth}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1093/fampra/18.1.1",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Family Practice",
issn = "0263-2136",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomized controlled trial of direct access for laparoscopic sterilization

AU - McKessock, L.

AU - Smith, Blair Hamilton

AU - Scott, Anthony

AU - Graham, Wendy Jane

AU - Terry, Peter

AU - Templeton, Alexander Allan

AU - Fitzmaurice, Ann Elizabeth

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Objectives. The aim of this study was to establish and evaluate a direct access service for laparoscopic sterilization.Methods. A pragmatic randomized controlled trial was carried out on a total of 232 women referred to Aberdeen Royal Infirmary for sterilization between 1 June 1996 and 31 March 1997, from 57 general practices around Aberdeen, Scotland, comprising 75 from general practices that had received criteria for direct access, and 157 from control practices. The main outcome measures were: patients' waiting times to appointments and operation, satisfaction, short-term regret, operative complications and costs; conjoint analysis of patient preferences; GPs' adherence to referral criteria; GP and gynaecologist satisfaction; and NHS costs.Results. Analysis was by intention to treat. There were no inappropriate direct referrals. Waiting time was lower in the intervention group, but there were more visits post-operatively to the GP. Patient and doctor satisfaction was equally high in both groups. There was no difference in operative complication rate, nor in total cost to patients or to the NHS. GPs and gynaecologists strongly supported direct access, but women preferred to meet both a gynaecologist and a GP before sterilization (routine referral). Other attributes of care important to patients included written information, although waiting time was not important. Of all women referred for sterilization during the study period, only 31% were suitable for direct referral.Conclusions. Patients preferred routine referral, and there were no differences in patient costs or satisfaction. There was, however, strong medical support for direct referral. Restrictive direct referral criteria may limit the uptake. These findings are important for future planning of direct referral services. Important methodological lessons were also learnt about the conduct of trials involving the primary-secondary care interface.

AB - Objectives. The aim of this study was to establish and evaluate a direct access service for laparoscopic sterilization.Methods. A pragmatic randomized controlled trial was carried out on a total of 232 women referred to Aberdeen Royal Infirmary for sterilization between 1 June 1996 and 31 March 1997, from 57 general practices around Aberdeen, Scotland, comprising 75 from general practices that had received criteria for direct access, and 157 from control practices. The main outcome measures were: patients' waiting times to appointments and operation, satisfaction, short-term regret, operative complications and costs; conjoint analysis of patient preferences; GPs' adherence to referral criteria; GP and gynaecologist satisfaction; and NHS costs.Results. Analysis was by intention to treat. There were no inappropriate direct referrals. Waiting time was lower in the intervention group, but there were more visits post-operatively to the GP. Patient and doctor satisfaction was equally high in both groups. There was no difference in operative complication rate, nor in total cost to patients or to the NHS. GPs and gynaecologists strongly supported direct access, but women preferred to meet both a gynaecologist and a GP before sterilization (routine referral). Other attributes of care important to patients included written information, although waiting time was not important. Of all women referred for sterilization during the study period, only 31% were suitable for direct referral.Conclusions. Patients preferred routine referral, and there were no differences in patient costs or satisfaction. There was, however, strong medical support for direct referral. Restrictive direct referral criteria may limit the uptake. These findings are important for future planning of direct referral services. Important methodological lessons were also learnt about the conduct of trials involving the primary-secondary care interface.

KW - conjoint analysis

KW - direct access

KW - direct referral

KW - laparoscopic sterilization

KW - randomized controlled trial

KW - HEALTH-CARE

U2 - 10.1093/fampra/18.1.1

DO - 10.1093/fampra/18.1.1

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Family Practice

JF - Family Practice

SN - 0263-2136

IS - 1

ER -