AB v HM Advocate: Rationalising Restrictions on the Use of the "Reasonable Belief" Defence

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Downloads (Pure)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-185
Number of pages7
JournalJuridical Review
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017

Keywords

  • child sex offences
  • defences
  • reasonable belief
  • right to respect for private and family life
  • Scotland
  • criminal law

Cite this

AB v HM Advocate: Rationalising Restrictions on the Use of the "Reasonable Belief" Defence. / Callander, Isla.

In: Juridical Review, No. 3, 10.2017, p. 179-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{0adaf51f45ab46eb85bfe1c67e5e72a7,
title = "AB v HM Advocate: Rationalising Restrictions on the Use of the {"}Reasonable Belief{"} Defence",
keywords = "child sex offences, defences, reasonable belief, right to respect for private and family life, Scotland, criminal law",
author = "Isla Callander",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
language = "English",
pages = "179--185",
journal = "Juridical Review",
issn = "0022-6785",
publisher = "W. Green & sons",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - AB v HM Advocate: Rationalising Restrictions on the Use of the "Reasonable Belief" Defence

AU - Callander, Isla

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

KW - child sex offences

KW - defences

KW - reasonable belief

KW - right to respect for private and family life

KW - Scotland

KW - criminal law

M3 - Review article

SP - 179

EP - 185

JO - Juridical Review

JF - Juridical Review

SN - 0022-6785

IS - 3

ER -