After geopolitics?

From the geopolitical social to geoeconomics

Deborah Cowen, Neil Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

169 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper makes two central arguments. First, the popular language of geopolitics needs to be understood as historically emerging from and helping create a “geopolitical social”, which both crosses and crafts traditional borders of internal and external to the national state. Second, we suggest that geoeconomic social forms are gradually supplanting this geopolitical social. After establishing the geopolitical social associated with traditional geopolitics, from Ratzel to Bismarck, we examine the erosion of geopolitical calculation and the rise of the geoeconomic. We trace emerging geoeconomic social forms in three domains: the reframing of territorial security to accommodate supranational flows; the recasting of social forms of security through the market; and the reframing of the state as geoeconomic agent. Neither an exercise in “critical geopolitics” nor an endorsement of Luttwakian style geoeconomics, this paper assumes no straightforward historical succession from geopolitical to geoeconomic logics, but argues that geoeconomics is nonetheless crucial to the spatial reconfiguration of contemporary political geography.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-48
Number of pages27
JournalAntipode
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2009

Fingerprint

geopolitics
political geography
national state
erosion
geography
market
language

Keywords

  • geopolitics
  • geoeconomics
  • security
  • the social
  • Ratzel
  • the state

Cite this

After geopolitics? From the geopolitical social to geoeconomics. / Cowen, Deborah; Smith, Neil.

In: Antipode, Vol. 41, No. 1, 01.2009, p. 22-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cowen, Deborah ; Smith, Neil. / After geopolitics? From the geopolitical social to geoeconomics. In: Antipode. 2009 ; Vol. 41, No. 1. pp. 22-48.
@article{bc8287d20fe5442598e8d60b49c983bc,
title = "After geopolitics?: From the geopolitical social to geoeconomics",
abstract = "This paper makes two central arguments. First, the popular language of geopolitics needs to be understood as historically emerging from and helping create a “geopolitical social”, which both crosses and crafts traditional borders of internal and external to the national state. Second, we suggest that geoeconomic social forms are gradually supplanting this geopolitical social. After establishing the geopolitical social associated with traditional geopolitics, from Ratzel to Bismarck, we examine the erosion of geopolitical calculation and the rise of the geoeconomic. We trace emerging geoeconomic social forms in three domains: the reframing of territorial security to accommodate supranational flows; the recasting of social forms of security through the market; and the reframing of the state as geoeconomic agent. Neither an exercise in “critical geopolitics” nor an endorsement of Luttwakian style geoeconomics, this paper assumes no straightforward historical succession from geopolitical to geoeconomic logics, but argues that geoeconomics is nonetheless crucial to the spatial reconfiguration of contemporary political geography.",
keywords = "geopolitics, geoeconomics, security, the social , Ratzel, the state",
author = "Deborah Cowen and Neil Smith",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00654.x",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "22--48",
journal = "Antipode",
issn = "0066-4812",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - After geopolitics?

T2 - From the geopolitical social to geoeconomics

AU - Cowen, Deborah

AU - Smith, Neil

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - This paper makes two central arguments. First, the popular language of geopolitics needs to be understood as historically emerging from and helping create a “geopolitical social”, which both crosses and crafts traditional borders of internal and external to the national state. Second, we suggest that geoeconomic social forms are gradually supplanting this geopolitical social. After establishing the geopolitical social associated with traditional geopolitics, from Ratzel to Bismarck, we examine the erosion of geopolitical calculation and the rise of the geoeconomic. We trace emerging geoeconomic social forms in three domains: the reframing of territorial security to accommodate supranational flows; the recasting of social forms of security through the market; and the reframing of the state as geoeconomic agent. Neither an exercise in “critical geopolitics” nor an endorsement of Luttwakian style geoeconomics, this paper assumes no straightforward historical succession from geopolitical to geoeconomic logics, but argues that geoeconomics is nonetheless crucial to the spatial reconfiguration of contemporary political geography.

AB - This paper makes two central arguments. First, the popular language of geopolitics needs to be understood as historically emerging from and helping create a “geopolitical social”, which both crosses and crafts traditional borders of internal and external to the national state. Second, we suggest that geoeconomic social forms are gradually supplanting this geopolitical social. After establishing the geopolitical social associated with traditional geopolitics, from Ratzel to Bismarck, we examine the erosion of geopolitical calculation and the rise of the geoeconomic. We trace emerging geoeconomic social forms in three domains: the reframing of territorial security to accommodate supranational flows; the recasting of social forms of security through the market; and the reframing of the state as geoeconomic agent. Neither an exercise in “critical geopolitics” nor an endorsement of Luttwakian style geoeconomics, this paper assumes no straightforward historical succession from geopolitical to geoeconomic logics, but argues that geoeconomics is nonetheless crucial to the spatial reconfiguration of contemporary political geography.

KW - geopolitics

KW - geoeconomics

KW - security

KW - the social

KW - Ratzel

KW - the state

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00654.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00654.x

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 22

EP - 48

JO - Antipode

JF - Antipode

SN - 0066-4812

IS - 1

ER -