Against ephemerality: performing for the camera in Central and Eastern Europe

Amy Bryzgel (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The relationship between performance art and the camera – be it the photographic or video camera – in Central and Eastern Europe is a special one. Because of the manner in which performance art developed in the region, remaining mainly an alternative form of art, artists preserved their work visually for a range of reasons: as evidence of it having occurred, as a witness to the event, for a future audience that could someday appreciate it, or to be sent abroad as mail art – one of the few ways artists could participate in international exhibitions and networks if they were unable to travel abroad, which they often were. Unlike in Western Europe and North America, where performance attempted to eschew the grasp of commodification, in Central and Eastern Europe, artists did not want their performative work to remain ephemeral. This article will demonstrate how documentation played a very important role in insuring its longevity, and argue that rather than creating performances to avoid commodification, artists deliberately used the camera to preserve these ephemeral acts, either for distribution at the time, or as a record of the event. It will also show how artists developed innovative ways to integrate this essential tool, the camera, into their actions.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe
Early online date15 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Central Europe
Eastern Europe
artist
art
performance
event
Western Europe
witness
documentation
video
travel
Artist
Ephemerality
Art
evidence
Commodification
Ephemeral
Performance Art

Keywords

  • performance art
  • Eastern Europe
  • Central and Eastern Europe
  • audience
  • ephemerality

Cite this

@article{a5a992bd3592477b912cab62595927a6,
title = "Against ephemerality: performing for the camera in Central and Eastern Europe",
abstract = "The relationship between performance art and the camera – be it the photographic or video camera – in Central and Eastern Europe is a special one. Because of the manner in which performance art developed in the region, remaining mainly an alternative form of art, artists preserved their work visually for a range of reasons: as evidence of it having occurred, as a witness to the event, for a future audience that could someday appreciate it, or to be sent abroad as mail art – one of the few ways artists could participate in international exhibitions and networks if they were unable to travel abroad, which they often were. Unlike in Western Europe and North America, where performance attempted to eschew the grasp of commodification, in Central and Eastern Europe, artists did not want their performative work to remain ephemeral. This article will demonstrate how documentation played a very important role in insuring its longevity, and argue that rather than creating performances to avoid commodification, artists deliberately used the camera to preserve these ephemeral acts, either for distribution at the time, or as a record of the event. It will also show how artists developed innovative ways to integrate this essential tool, the camera, into their actions.",
keywords = "performance art, Eastern Europe, Central and Eastern Europe, audience, ephemerality",
author = "Amy Bryzgel",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1080/25739638.2019.1643056",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe",
issn = "2573-9638",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Against ephemerality

T2 - performing for the camera in Central and Eastern Europe

AU - Bryzgel, Amy

PY - 2019/7/15

Y1 - 2019/7/15

N2 - The relationship between performance art and the camera – be it the photographic or video camera – in Central and Eastern Europe is a special one. Because of the manner in which performance art developed in the region, remaining mainly an alternative form of art, artists preserved their work visually for a range of reasons: as evidence of it having occurred, as a witness to the event, for a future audience that could someday appreciate it, or to be sent abroad as mail art – one of the few ways artists could participate in international exhibitions and networks if they were unable to travel abroad, which they often were. Unlike in Western Europe and North America, where performance attempted to eschew the grasp of commodification, in Central and Eastern Europe, artists did not want their performative work to remain ephemeral. This article will demonstrate how documentation played a very important role in insuring its longevity, and argue that rather than creating performances to avoid commodification, artists deliberately used the camera to preserve these ephemeral acts, either for distribution at the time, or as a record of the event. It will also show how artists developed innovative ways to integrate this essential tool, the camera, into their actions.

AB - The relationship between performance art and the camera – be it the photographic or video camera – in Central and Eastern Europe is a special one. Because of the manner in which performance art developed in the region, remaining mainly an alternative form of art, artists preserved their work visually for a range of reasons: as evidence of it having occurred, as a witness to the event, for a future audience that could someday appreciate it, or to be sent abroad as mail art – one of the few ways artists could participate in international exhibitions and networks if they were unable to travel abroad, which they often were. Unlike in Western Europe and North America, where performance attempted to eschew the grasp of commodification, in Central and Eastern Europe, artists did not want their performative work to remain ephemeral. This article will demonstrate how documentation played a very important role in insuring its longevity, and argue that rather than creating performances to avoid commodification, artists deliberately used the camera to preserve these ephemeral acts, either for distribution at the time, or as a record of the event. It will also show how artists developed innovative ways to integrate this essential tool, the camera, into their actions.

KW - performance art

KW - Eastern Europe

KW - Central and Eastern Europe

KW - audience

KW - ephemerality

UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25739638.2019.1643056

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/against-ephemerality-performing-camera-central-eastern-europe

U2 - 10.1080/25739638.2019.1643056

DO - 10.1080/25739638.2019.1643056

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe

JF - Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe

SN - 2573-9638

ER -