Ambiguity and ambivalence: organizational change in government departments

Julian Adrian Randall, Stephen Procter

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

Abstract

The way in which workers and managers interpret change at work has been an important focus of interest for researchers. This interpretation may find them assimilating change as they listen to accounts from other workers experienced in the outcomes of such events. On the other hand, there may be a divergence among workers concerning the value and meaning to be ascribed to the change events. If this is the case, a culture of ambiguity may be said to exist, where the nature, degree and value of the cultural change are highly contested and remarkably unclear (McLoughlin et al;., 2005). Following Piderit (2000), this paper suggests this may explain the disparity between an individual’s expectancy of change and their response to it, and also that, individuals’ ambivalence may influence whether they accept change, adapt to it, or reject it out-of-hand, . We show how different dimensions of ambivalence in different individuals can lead not only to different responses to imposed change at work, but can also account for individuals coming to terms with the demands of change.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherUniversity of Aberdeen
Number of pages20
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Publication series

NameUniversity of Aberdeen Business School Working Paper Series

Fingerprint

Organizational change
Ambivalence
Government
Workers
Nature
Expectancy
Divergence
Managers
Cultural change

Cite this

Randall, J. A., & Procter, S. (2007). Ambiguity and ambivalence: organizational change in government departments. (University of Aberdeen Business School Working Paper Series). University of Aberdeen.

Ambiguity and ambivalence : organizational change in government departments. / Randall, Julian Adrian; Procter, Stephen .

University of Aberdeen, 2007. (University of Aberdeen Business School Working Paper Series).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

Randall, JA & Procter, S 2007 'Ambiguity and ambivalence: organizational change in government departments' University of Aberdeen Business School Working Paper Series, University of Aberdeen.
Randall JA, Procter S. Ambiguity and ambivalence: organizational change in government departments. University of Aberdeen. 2007. (University of Aberdeen Business School Working Paper Series).
Randall, Julian Adrian ; Procter, Stephen . / Ambiguity and ambivalence : organizational change in government departments. University of Aberdeen, 2007. (University of Aberdeen Business School Working Paper Series).
@techreport{522689ed61794127a90d15a9f1d062ac,
title = "Ambiguity and ambivalence: organizational change in government departments",
abstract = "The way in which workers and managers interpret change at work has been an important focus of interest for researchers. This interpretation may find them assimilating change as they listen to accounts from other workers experienced in the outcomes of such events. On the other hand, there may be a divergence among workers concerning the value and meaning to be ascribed to the change events. If this is the case, a culture of ambiguity may be said to exist, where the nature, degree and value of the cultural change are highly contested and remarkably unclear (McLoughlin et al;., 2005). Following Piderit (2000), this paper suggests this may explain the disparity between an individual’s expectancy of change and their response to it, and also that, individuals’ ambivalence may influence whether they accept change, adapt to it, or reject it out-of-hand, . We show how different dimensions of ambivalence in different individuals can lead not only to different responses to imposed change at work, but can also account for individuals coming to terms with the demands of change.",
author = "Randall, {Julian Adrian} and Stephen Procter",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
series = "University of Aberdeen Business School Working Paper Series",
publisher = "University of Aberdeen",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "University of Aberdeen",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - Ambiguity and ambivalence

T2 - organizational change in government departments

AU - Randall, Julian Adrian

AU - Procter, Stephen

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - The way in which workers and managers interpret change at work has been an important focus of interest for researchers. This interpretation may find them assimilating change as they listen to accounts from other workers experienced in the outcomes of such events. On the other hand, there may be a divergence among workers concerning the value and meaning to be ascribed to the change events. If this is the case, a culture of ambiguity may be said to exist, where the nature, degree and value of the cultural change are highly contested and remarkably unclear (McLoughlin et al;., 2005). Following Piderit (2000), this paper suggests this may explain the disparity between an individual’s expectancy of change and their response to it, and also that, individuals’ ambivalence may influence whether they accept change, adapt to it, or reject it out-of-hand, . We show how different dimensions of ambivalence in different individuals can lead not only to different responses to imposed change at work, but can also account for individuals coming to terms with the demands of change.

AB - The way in which workers and managers interpret change at work has been an important focus of interest for researchers. This interpretation may find them assimilating change as they listen to accounts from other workers experienced in the outcomes of such events. On the other hand, there may be a divergence among workers concerning the value and meaning to be ascribed to the change events. If this is the case, a culture of ambiguity may be said to exist, where the nature, degree and value of the cultural change are highly contested and remarkably unclear (McLoughlin et al;., 2005). Following Piderit (2000), this paper suggests this may explain the disparity between an individual’s expectancy of change and their response to it, and also that, individuals’ ambivalence may influence whether they accept change, adapt to it, or reject it out-of-hand, . We show how different dimensions of ambivalence in different individuals can lead not only to different responses to imposed change at work, but can also account for individuals coming to terms with the demands of change.

M3 - Discussion paper

T3 - University of Aberdeen Business School Working Paper Series

BT - Ambiguity and ambivalence

PB - University of Aberdeen

ER -