An Assessment of Students’ and Health Professional’ Abilities to Site Stomas Accurately on Human Cadavers

Andrew Arnott, Louise Cowpland, Josephine Jury, Ronald Keenan, A McKinley, Derek A Scott

Research output: Contribution to conferencePoster

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A stoma is a surgically constructed opening created to treat disease or damage in a patient. Common examples include colostomies and ileostomies. Macdonald et al. (2003) previously indicated that stoma nurses were superior to surgeons at identifying stoma sites, potentially reducing post-operative complications and preventing stoma failure. However, that study did not assess these healthcare professionals under the same conditions, potentially skewing the conclusions.We aimed to investigate the accuracy of siting stomas between specialist stoma nurses compared with trainee surgeons, students and non-clinical academics with some anatomical background. All groups would site stomas under the same conditions using human cadavers.Ethical approval was granted by UoA CLSM Ethical Review Board. Students (BSc n=39, MBChB=28), non-clinical academic staff(n=14), stoma nurses (n=3) and surgeons (n=8) were recruited. Each participant assessed stoma locations on ten anonymised cadavers.A3 Acetate sheets with 1cm2 grids indicating XY coordinates covered each cadaver’s abdomen. Participants marked the locations of their proposed ileostomy and a colostomy on these acetates. Mean coordinates obtained from different participant groups were compared against a ‘gold standard’ established by a group of experienced senior colorectal surgeons/nurses. Statistical analysis using Student’s unpaired t-test between sets of coordinates was undertaken to assess whether there were any differences between the ‘ideal stoma location’ and the mean X and Y coordinates identified by participants. Participants were also asked how they identified their sites and their confidence when doing so.There was a significant difference between the x coordinates for siting an ileostomy (<0.001) and colostomy (<0.05), but there was no significant difference for the y coordinates when comparing stoma nurses and surgeons. Stoma nurses were nearest the pre-determined ‘gold standard’ locations. Confusion regarding the height of stoma location on the abdomen dominated when non-clinical academics were assessed, but with physiology staff demonstrating superior accuracy to anatomy faculty. There was no significant difference between the X and Y coordinates for siting both an ileostomy and a colostomy when comparing science and medical students as cohorts.Participant responses indicated that confidence in siting a stoma was no indication of accuracy. Other comments indicated that those who were most likely to site a stoma accurately had considered how the person would function in real life (i.e. how they would walk, where fat masses would move when upright etc) as well as their anatomy. Those who did less well tended to only observe anatomical landmarks to make their decisions.Surgical training involving stoma nurses where anatomy, physiology and lifestyle are considered may improve stoma siting technique and post-operative outcomes for patients.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 2019
EventPhysiology 2019 - Aberdeen Exhibition & Conference Centre, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
Duration: 8 Jul 201910 Jul 2019
http://www.physoc.org/physiology2019/physiology-2019

Conference

ConferencePhysiology 2019
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityAberdeen
Period8/07/1910/07/19
Internet address

Fingerprint

Cadaver
Ileostomy
Colostomy
Nurses
Students
Health
Anatomy
Abdomen
Acetates
Ethical Review
Post and Core Technique
Medical Students
Life Style
Fats
Surgeons
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • stoma
  • physiology
  • anatomy
  • students
  • nurse
  • surgeon
  • cadaver
  • human

Cite this

Arnott, A., Cowpland, L., Jury, J., Keenan, R., McKinley, A., & Scott, D. A. (2019). An Assessment of Students’ and Health Professional’ Abilities to Site Stomas Accurately on Human Cadavers. Poster session presented at Physiology 2019, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.

An Assessment of Students’ and Health Professional’ Abilities to Site Stomas Accurately on Human Cadavers. / Arnott, Andrew; Cowpland, Louise; Jury, Josephine; Keenan, Ronald; McKinley, A; Scott, Derek A.

2019. Poster session presented at Physiology 2019, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePoster

Arnott, A, Cowpland, L, Jury, J, Keenan, R, McKinley, A & Scott, DA 2019, 'An Assessment of Students’ and Health Professional’ Abilities to Site Stomas Accurately on Human Cadavers', Physiology 2019, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, 8/07/19 - 10/07/19.
Arnott A, Cowpland L, Jury J, Keenan R, McKinley A, Scott DA. An Assessment of Students’ and Health Professional’ Abilities to Site Stomas Accurately on Human Cadavers. 2019. Poster session presented at Physiology 2019, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Arnott, Andrew ; Cowpland, Louise ; Jury, Josephine ; Keenan, Ronald ; McKinley, A ; Scott, Derek A. / An Assessment of Students’ and Health Professional’ Abilities to Site Stomas Accurately on Human Cadavers. Poster session presented at Physiology 2019, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
@conference{4d223a0c78854b408d3f3bbbf5efdddd,
title = "An Assessment of Students’ and Health Professional’ Abilities to Site Stomas Accurately on Human Cadavers",
abstract = "A stoma is a surgically constructed opening created to treat disease or damage in a patient. Common examples include colostomies and ileostomies. Macdonald et al. (2003) previously indicated that stoma nurses were superior to surgeons at identifying stoma sites, potentially reducing post-operative complications and preventing stoma failure. However, that study did not assess these healthcare professionals under the same conditions, potentially skewing the conclusions.We aimed to investigate the accuracy of siting stomas between specialist stoma nurses compared with trainee surgeons, students and non-clinical academics with some anatomical background. All groups would site stomas under the same conditions using human cadavers.Ethical approval was granted by UoA CLSM Ethical Review Board. Students (BSc n=39, MBChB=28), non-clinical academic staff(n=14), stoma nurses (n=3) and surgeons (n=8) were recruited. Each participant assessed stoma locations on ten anonymised cadavers.A3 Acetate sheets with 1cm2 grids indicating XY coordinates covered each cadaver’s abdomen. Participants marked the locations of their proposed ileostomy and a colostomy on these acetates. Mean coordinates obtained from different participant groups were compared against a ‘gold standard’ established by a group of experienced senior colorectal surgeons/nurses. Statistical analysis using Student’s unpaired t-test between sets of coordinates was undertaken to assess whether there were any differences between the ‘ideal stoma location’ and the mean X and Y coordinates identified by participants. Participants were also asked how they identified their sites and their confidence when doing so.There was a significant difference between the x coordinates for siting an ileostomy (<0.001) and colostomy (<0.05), but there was no significant difference for the y coordinates when comparing stoma nurses and surgeons. Stoma nurses were nearest the pre-determined ‘gold standard’ locations. Confusion regarding the height of stoma location on the abdomen dominated when non-clinical academics were assessed, but with physiology staff demonstrating superior accuracy to anatomy faculty. There was no significant difference between the X and Y coordinates for siting both an ileostomy and a colostomy when comparing science and medical students as cohorts.Participant responses indicated that confidence in siting a stoma was no indication of accuracy. Other comments indicated that those who were most likely to site a stoma accurately had considered how the person would function in real life (i.e. how they would walk, where fat masses would move when upright etc) as well as their anatomy. Those who did less well tended to only observe anatomical landmarks to make their decisions.Surgical training involving stoma nurses where anatomy, physiology and lifestyle are considered may improve stoma siting technique and post-operative outcomes for patients.",
keywords = "stoma, physiology, anatomy, students, nurse, surgeon, cadaver, human",
author = "Andrew Arnott and Louise Cowpland and Josephine Jury and Ronald Keenan and A McKinley and Scott, {Derek A}",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
note = "Physiology 2019 ; Conference date: 08-07-2019 Through 10-07-2019",
url = "http://www.physoc.org/physiology2019/physiology-2019",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - An Assessment of Students’ and Health Professional’ Abilities to Site Stomas Accurately on Human Cadavers

AU - Arnott, Andrew

AU - Cowpland, Louise

AU - Jury, Josephine

AU - Keenan, Ronald

AU - McKinley, A

AU - Scott, Derek A

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - A stoma is a surgically constructed opening created to treat disease or damage in a patient. Common examples include colostomies and ileostomies. Macdonald et al. (2003) previously indicated that stoma nurses were superior to surgeons at identifying stoma sites, potentially reducing post-operative complications and preventing stoma failure. However, that study did not assess these healthcare professionals under the same conditions, potentially skewing the conclusions.We aimed to investigate the accuracy of siting stomas between specialist stoma nurses compared with trainee surgeons, students and non-clinical academics with some anatomical background. All groups would site stomas under the same conditions using human cadavers.Ethical approval was granted by UoA CLSM Ethical Review Board. Students (BSc n=39, MBChB=28), non-clinical academic staff(n=14), stoma nurses (n=3) and surgeons (n=8) were recruited. Each participant assessed stoma locations on ten anonymised cadavers.A3 Acetate sheets with 1cm2 grids indicating XY coordinates covered each cadaver’s abdomen. Participants marked the locations of their proposed ileostomy and a colostomy on these acetates. Mean coordinates obtained from different participant groups were compared against a ‘gold standard’ established by a group of experienced senior colorectal surgeons/nurses. Statistical analysis using Student’s unpaired t-test between sets of coordinates was undertaken to assess whether there were any differences between the ‘ideal stoma location’ and the mean X and Y coordinates identified by participants. Participants were also asked how they identified their sites and their confidence when doing so.There was a significant difference between the x coordinates for siting an ileostomy (<0.001) and colostomy (<0.05), but there was no significant difference for the y coordinates when comparing stoma nurses and surgeons. Stoma nurses were nearest the pre-determined ‘gold standard’ locations. Confusion regarding the height of stoma location on the abdomen dominated when non-clinical academics were assessed, but with physiology staff demonstrating superior accuracy to anatomy faculty. There was no significant difference between the X and Y coordinates for siting both an ileostomy and a colostomy when comparing science and medical students as cohorts.Participant responses indicated that confidence in siting a stoma was no indication of accuracy. Other comments indicated that those who were most likely to site a stoma accurately had considered how the person would function in real life (i.e. how they would walk, where fat masses would move when upright etc) as well as their anatomy. Those who did less well tended to only observe anatomical landmarks to make their decisions.Surgical training involving stoma nurses where anatomy, physiology and lifestyle are considered may improve stoma siting technique and post-operative outcomes for patients.

AB - A stoma is a surgically constructed opening created to treat disease or damage in a patient. Common examples include colostomies and ileostomies. Macdonald et al. (2003) previously indicated that stoma nurses were superior to surgeons at identifying stoma sites, potentially reducing post-operative complications and preventing stoma failure. However, that study did not assess these healthcare professionals under the same conditions, potentially skewing the conclusions.We aimed to investigate the accuracy of siting stomas between specialist stoma nurses compared with trainee surgeons, students and non-clinical academics with some anatomical background. All groups would site stomas under the same conditions using human cadavers.Ethical approval was granted by UoA CLSM Ethical Review Board. Students (BSc n=39, MBChB=28), non-clinical academic staff(n=14), stoma nurses (n=3) and surgeons (n=8) were recruited. Each participant assessed stoma locations on ten anonymised cadavers.A3 Acetate sheets with 1cm2 grids indicating XY coordinates covered each cadaver’s abdomen. Participants marked the locations of their proposed ileostomy and a colostomy on these acetates. Mean coordinates obtained from different participant groups were compared against a ‘gold standard’ established by a group of experienced senior colorectal surgeons/nurses. Statistical analysis using Student’s unpaired t-test between sets of coordinates was undertaken to assess whether there were any differences between the ‘ideal stoma location’ and the mean X and Y coordinates identified by participants. Participants were also asked how they identified their sites and their confidence when doing so.There was a significant difference between the x coordinates for siting an ileostomy (<0.001) and colostomy (<0.05), but there was no significant difference for the y coordinates when comparing stoma nurses and surgeons. Stoma nurses were nearest the pre-determined ‘gold standard’ locations. Confusion regarding the height of stoma location on the abdomen dominated when non-clinical academics were assessed, but with physiology staff demonstrating superior accuracy to anatomy faculty. There was no significant difference between the X and Y coordinates for siting both an ileostomy and a colostomy when comparing science and medical students as cohorts.Participant responses indicated that confidence in siting a stoma was no indication of accuracy. Other comments indicated that those who were most likely to site a stoma accurately had considered how the person would function in real life (i.e. how they would walk, where fat masses would move when upright etc) as well as their anatomy. Those who did less well tended to only observe anatomical landmarks to make their decisions.Surgical training involving stoma nurses where anatomy, physiology and lifestyle are considered may improve stoma siting technique and post-operative outcomes for patients.

KW - stoma

KW - physiology

KW - anatomy

KW - students

KW - nurse

KW - surgeon

KW - cadaver

KW - human

M3 - Poster

ER -