An Empirical Study on the Contractual Risk Allocation and Indemnity and Hold Harmless Clauses in the Oilfield Service Contracts in Malaysia

Wan M. Zulhafiz

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Oil and gas projects are risky undertakings, which may cause severe damage to property and the environment, not to mention, personal injury and death to personnel. Contractual provision such as an indemnity and mutual hold harmless clause is used as a tool in allocating the risks. Most oil companies, in their task to manage the risks, seek to depart from the traditional form of risk allocation e.g. knock-for-knock indemnity regime. In this respect, there is a tendency that the oil companies will pass a greater share of the risks on to contractors. This problem could lead to financial impairment and unfairness to the contractors. An empirical study was conducted to investigate the issues and problems with regard to risk allocation provisions and indemnity and hold harmless clauses of oilfield service contracts in Malaysia. The data for the empirical study was drawn from the intensive semi-structured interviews of ten respondents from oil companies, contractors and one legal practitioner. The finding of this empirical study indicates that contractors are concerned about the one-way adversarial style of operator-contractor relationship and also that they are being allocated more contractual risks. The methodology employed in this paper will essentially be a combination of literature review and semi-structured interview, which will be carried out in a prescriptive and analytic manner.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPaper Proceedings of 'Second International Conference on Interdisciplinary Legal Studies (ICILS) 2015' on 9th & 10th June 2015 in Toronto, Canada
PublisherSSRN
Pages103-111
Number of pages9
ISBN (Print)978-0-9939889-5-0
Publication statusPublished - 2015
EventSecond International Conference on Interdisciplinary Legal Studies (ICILS) 2015' - Toronto, Canada
Duration: 9 Jun 201510 Jun 2015

Conference

ConferenceSecond International Conference on Interdisciplinary Legal Studies (ICILS) 2015'
CountryCanada
CityToronto
Period9/06/1510/06/15

Fingerprint

Empirical study
Contractors
Risk allocation
Malaysia
Oil
Structured interview
Impairment
Gas
Methodology
Literature review
Damage
Operator
Personnel

Keywords

  • contract law
  • oil and gas
  • Malaysia

Cite this

Zulhafiz, W. M. (2015). An Empirical Study on the Contractual Risk Allocation and Indemnity and Hold Harmless Clauses in the Oilfield Service Contracts in Malaysia. In Paper Proceedings of 'Second International Conference on Interdisciplinary Legal Studies (ICILS) 2015' on 9th & 10th June 2015 in Toronto, Canada (pp. 103-111). SSRN.

An Empirical Study on the Contractual Risk Allocation and Indemnity and Hold Harmless Clauses in the Oilfield Service Contracts in Malaysia. / Zulhafiz, Wan M.

Paper Proceedings of 'Second International Conference on Interdisciplinary Legal Studies (ICILS) 2015' on 9th & 10th June 2015 in Toronto, Canada. SSRN, 2015. p. 103-111.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Zulhafiz, WM 2015, An Empirical Study on the Contractual Risk Allocation and Indemnity and Hold Harmless Clauses in the Oilfield Service Contracts in Malaysia. in Paper Proceedings of 'Second International Conference on Interdisciplinary Legal Studies (ICILS) 2015' on 9th & 10th June 2015 in Toronto, Canada. SSRN, pp. 103-111, Second International Conference on Interdisciplinary Legal Studies (ICILS) 2015', Toronto, Canada, 9/06/15.
Zulhafiz WM. An Empirical Study on the Contractual Risk Allocation and Indemnity and Hold Harmless Clauses in the Oilfield Service Contracts in Malaysia. In Paper Proceedings of 'Second International Conference on Interdisciplinary Legal Studies (ICILS) 2015' on 9th & 10th June 2015 in Toronto, Canada. SSRN. 2015. p. 103-111
Zulhafiz, Wan M. / An Empirical Study on the Contractual Risk Allocation and Indemnity and Hold Harmless Clauses in the Oilfield Service Contracts in Malaysia. Paper Proceedings of 'Second International Conference on Interdisciplinary Legal Studies (ICILS) 2015' on 9th & 10th June 2015 in Toronto, Canada. SSRN, 2015. pp. 103-111
@inproceedings{aebe358ef1c7436194c34931929de5d5,
title = "An Empirical Study on the Contractual Risk Allocation and Indemnity and Hold Harmless Clauses in the Oilfield Service Contracts in Malaysia",
abstract = "Oil and gas projects are risky undertakings, which may cause severe damage to property and the environment, not to mention, personal injury and death to personnel. Contractual provision such as an indemnity and mutual hold harmless clause is used as a tool in allocating the risks. Most oil companies, in their task to manage the risks, seek to depart from the traditional form of risk allocation e.g. knock-for-knock indemnity regime. In this respect, there is a tendency that the oil companies will pass a greater share of the risks on to contractors. This problem could lead to financial impairment and unfairness to the contractors. An empirical study was conducted to investigate the issues and problems with regard to risk allocation provisions and indemnity and hold harmless clauses of oilfield service contracts in Malaysia. The data for the empirical study was drawn from the intensive semi-structured interviews of ten respondents from oil companies, contractors and one legal practitioner. The finding of this empirical study indicates that contractors are concerned about the one-way adversarial style of operator-contractor relationship and also that they are being allocated more contractual risks. The methodology employed in this paper will essentially be a combination of literature review and semi-structured interview, which will be carried out in a prescriptive and analytic manner.",
keywords = "contract law, oil and gas, Malaysia",
author = "Zulhafiz, {Wan M.}",
note = "M1 - Conference Proceedings",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-0-9939889-5-0",
pages = "103--111",
booktitle = "Paper Proceedings of 'Second International Conference on Interdisciplinary Legal Studies (ICILS) 2015' on 9th & 10th June 2015 in Toronto, Canada",
publisher = "SSRN",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - An Empirical Study on the Contractual Risk Allocation and Indemnity and Hold Harmless Clauses in the Oilfield Service Contracts in Malaysia

AU - Zulhafiz, Wan M.

N1 - M1 - Conference Proceedings

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Oil and gas projects are risky undertakings, which may cause severe damage to property and the environment, not to mention, personal injury and death to personnel. Contractual provision such as an indemnity and mutual hold harmless clause is used as a tool in allocating the risks. Most oil companies, in their task to manage the risks, seek to depart from the traditional form of risk allocation e.g. knock-for-knock indemnity regime. In this respect, there is a tendency that the oil companies will pass a greater share of the risks on to contractors. This problem could lead to financial impairment and unfairness to the contractors. An empirical study was conducted to investigate the issues and problems with regard to risk allocation provisions and indemnity and hold harmless clauses of oilfield service contracts in Malaysia. The data for the empirical study was drawn from the intensive semi-structured interviews of ten respondents from oil companies, contractors and one legal practitioner. The finding of this empirical study indicates that contractors are concerned about the one-way adversarial style of operator-contractor relationship and also that they are being allocated more contractual risks. The methodology employed in this paper will essentially be a combination of literature review and semi-structured interview, which will be carried out in a prescriptive and analytic manner.

AB - Oil and gas projects are risky undertakings, which may cause severe damage to property and the environment, not to mention, personal injury and death to personnel. Contractual provision such as an indemnity and mutual hold harmless clause is used as a tool in allocating the risks. Most oil companies, in their task to manage the risks, seek to depart from the traditional form of risk allocation e.g. knock-for-knock indemnity regime. In this respect, there is a tendency that the oil companies will pass a greater share of the risks on to contractors. This problem could lead to financial impairment and unfairness to the contractors. An empirical study was conducted to investigate the issues and problems with regard to risk allocation provisions and indemnity and hold harmless clauses of oilfield service contracts in Malaysia. The data for the empirical study was drawn from the intensive semi-structured interviews of ten respondents from oil companies, contractors and one legal practitioner. The finding of this empirical study indicates that contractors are concerned about the one-way adversarial style of operator-contractor relationship and also that they are being allocated more contractual risks. The methodology employed in this paper will essentially be a combination of literature review and semi-structured interview, which will be carried out in a prescriptive and analytic manner.

KW - contract law

KW - oil and gas

KW - Malaysia

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-0-9939889-5-0

SP - 103

EP - 111

BT - Paper Proceedings of 'Second International Conference on Interdisciplinary Legal Studies (ICILS) 2015' on 9th & 10th June 2015 in Toronto, Canada

PB - SSRN

ER -