Anomalies at the borderline of awareness: An ERP study

Anthony J. Sanford, Hartmut Leuthold, Jason Bohan, Alison J.S. Sanford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

75 Citations (Scopus)


Behaviorally, some semantic anomalies, such as those used to demonstrate N400 effects in ERPs, are easy to detect. However, some, such as "after an air crash, where should the survivors be buried?" are difficult. The difference has to do with the extent to which the anomalous word fits the general context. We asked whether anomalies that are missed elicit an ERP that could be taken as indicating unconscious recognition, and whether both types elicit an N400 effect when they are detected. We found that difficult anomalies having a good fit to general context did not produce an N400 effect, whereas control "easy-to-detect" anomalies did. For difficult anomalies, there was no evidence for unconscious detection occurring. The results support a qualitative distinction in the way the two types of anomalies are processed, and the idea that semantic information is simply not utilized (shallow processing) when difficult anomalies are missed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)514-523
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011


Dive into the research topics of 'Anomalies at the borderline of awareness: An ERP study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this