Appropriateness of antidepressant prescribing

an observational study in a Scottish primary-care setting

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Since the 1990s, Scottish community-based antidepressant prescribing has increased substantially.

Aim To assess whether GPs prescribe antidepressants appropriately.

Design of study Observational study of adults (aged >= 16 years) screened with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) attending a GP.

Setting Four practices in Grampian, Scotland.

Method Patients (n = 898) completed the HADS, and GPs independently estimated depression status. Notes were scrutinised for evidence of antidepressant use, and the appropriateness of prescribing was assessed.

Results A total of 237 (26%) participants had HADS scores indicating 'possible'(15%) or 'probable'(11%) depression. The proportion of participants rated as depressed by their GP differed significantly by HADS depression subscale scores. Odds ratio for 'possible' versus 'no' depression was 3.54 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.17 to 5.76, P<0.001); and for 'probable' versus 'possible' depression was 3.59 (95% CI = 2.06 to 6.26, P<0.001). Similarly, the proportion of participants receiving antidepressants differed significantly by HADS score. Odds ratio for 'possible' versus 'no' depression was 2.79 (95% Cl = 1.70 to 4.58, P<0.001); and for 'probable' versus 'possible' was 2.12 (95% Cl = 1.21 to 3.70, P = 0.009). In 101 participants with 'probable' depression, GPs recognised 53 (52%) participants as having a clinically significant depression. Inappropriate initiation of antidepressant treatment occurred very infrequently. Prescribing to participants who were not symptomatic was accounted for by the treatment of pain, anxiety, or relapse prevention, and for ongoing treatment of previously identified depression.

Conclusion There was little evidence of prescribing without relevant indication. Around half of patients with significant symptoms were not identified by their GP as suffering from a depressive disorder: this varied inversely with severity ratings. Rather than prescribing indiscriminately (as has been widely assumed), it is likely that GPs are initiating antidepressant treatment conservatively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)644-649
Number of pages6
JournalThe British Journal of General Practice
Volume59
Issue number566
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2009

Keywords

  • adolescent
  • adult
  • aged
  • antidepressive Agents
  • clinical competence
  • depressive disorder
  • diagnostic errors
  • family practice
  • female
  • humans
  • male
  • middle aged
  • physician's practice patterns
  • rural health
  • Scotland
  • unnecessary procedures
  • urban health
  • young adult

Cite this

Appropriateness of antidepressant prescribing : an observational study in a Scottish primary-care setting. / Cameron, I M; Lawton, K; Reid, I C.

In: The British Journal of General Practice, Vol. 59, No. 566, 01.09.2009, p. 644-649.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{328bb7295c78480fb3a4dc939d716219,
title = "Appropriateness of antidepressant prescribing: an observational study in a Scottish primary-care setting",
abstract = "Background Since the 1990s, Scottish community-based antidepressant prescribing has increased substantially.Aim To assess whether GPs prescribe antidepressants appropriately.Design of study Observational study of adults (aged >= 16 years) screened with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) attending a GP.Setting Four practices in Grampian, Scotland.Method Patients (n = 898) completed the HADS, and GPs independently estimated depression status. Notes were scrutinised for evidence of antidepressant use, and the appropriateness of prescribing was assessed.Results A total of 237 (26{\%}) participants had HADS scores indicating 'possible'(15{\%}) or 'probable'(11{\%}) depression. The proportion of participants rated as depressed by their GP differed significantly by HADS depression subscale scores. Odds ratio for 'possible' versus 'no' depression was 3.54 (95{\%} confidence interval [CI] = 2.17 to 5.76, P<0.001); and for 'probable' versus 'possible' depression was 3.59 (95{\%} CI = 2.06 to 6.26, P<0.001). Similarly, the proportion of participants receiving antidepressants differed significantly by HADS score. Odds ratio for 'possible' versus 'no' depression was 2.79 (95{\%} Cl = 1.70 to 4.58, P<0.001); and for 'probable' versus 'possible' was 2.12 (95{\%} Cl = 1.21 to 3.70, P = 0.009). In 101 participants with 'probable' depression, GPs recognised 53 (52{\%}) participants as having a clinically significant depression. Inappropriate initiation of antidepressant treatment occurred very infrequently. Prescribing to participants who were not symptomatic was accounted for by the treatment of pain, anxiety, or relapse prevention, and for ongoing treatment of previously identified depression.Conclusion There was little evidence of prescribing without relevant indication. Around half of patients with significant symptoms were not identified by their GP as suffering from a depressive disorder: this varied inversely with severity ratings. Rather than prescribing indiscriminately (as has been widely assumed), it is likely that GPs are initiating antidepressant treatment conservatively.",
keywords = "adolescent, adult, aged, antidepressive Agents, clinical competence, depressive disorder, diagnostic errors, family practice, female, humans, male, middle aged, physician's practice patterns, rural health, Scotland, unnecessary procedures, urban health, young adult",
author = "Cameron, {I M} and K Lawton and Reid, {I C}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3399/bjgp09X454061",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "644--649",
journal = "The British Journal of General Practice",
issn = "0960-1643",
publisher = "Royal College of General Practitioners",
number = "566",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Appropriateness of antidepressant prescribing

T2 - an observational study in a Scottish primary-care setting

AU - Cameron, I M

AU - Lawton, K

AU - Reid, I C

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - Background Since the 1990s, Scottish community-based antidepressant prescribing has increased substantially.Aim To assess whether GPs prescribe antidepressants appropriately.Design of study Observational study of adults (aged >= 16 years) screened with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) attending a GP.Setting Four practices in Grampian, Scotland.Method Patients (n = 898) completed the HADS, and GPs independently estimated depression status. Notes were scrutinised for evidence of antidepressant use, and the appropriateness of prescribing was assessed.Results A total of 237 (26%) participants had HADS scores indicating 'possible'(15%) or 'probable'(11%) depression. The proportion of participants rated as depressed by their GP differed significantly by HADS depression subscale scores. Odds ratio for 'possible' versus 'no' depression was 3.54 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.17 to 5.76, P<0.001); and for 'probable' versus 'possible' depression was 3.59 (95% CI = 2.06 to 6.26, P<0.001). Similarly, the proportion of participants receiving antidepressants differed significantly by HADS score. Odds ratio for 'possible' versus 'no' depression was 2.79 (95% Cl = 1.70 to 4.58, P<0.001); and for 'probable' versus 'possible' was 2.12 (95% Cl = 1.21 to 3.70, P = 0.009). In 101 participants with 'probable' depression, GPs recognised 53 (52%) participants as having a clinically significant depression. Inappropriate initiation of antidepressant treatment occurred very infrequently. Prescribing to participants who were not symptomatic was accounted for by the treatment of pain, anxiety, or relapse prevention, and for ongoing treatment of previously identified depression.Conclusion There was little evidence of prescribing without relevant indication. Around half of patients with significant symptoms were not identified by their GP as suffering from a depressive disorder: this varied inversely with severity ratings. Rather than prescribing indiscriminately (as has been widely assumed), it is likely that GPs are initiating antidepressant treatment conservatively.

AB - Background Since the 1990s, Scottish community-based antidepressant prescribing has increased substantially.Aim To assess whether GPs prescribe antidepressants appropriately.Design of study Observational study of adults (aged >= 16 years) screened with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) attending a GP.Setting Four practices in Grampian, Scotland.Method Patients (n = 898) completed the HADS, and GPs independently estimated depression status. Notes were scrutinised for evidence of antidepressant use, and the appropriateness of prescribing was assessed.Results A total of 237 (26%) participants had HADS scores indicating 'possible'(15%) or 'probable'(11%) depression. The proportion of participants rated as depressed by their GP differed significantly by HADS depression subscale scores. Odds ratio for 'possible' versus 'no' depression was 3.54 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.17 to 5.76, P<0.001); and for 'probable' versus 'possible' depression was 3.59 (95% CI = 2.06 to 6.26, P<0.001). Similarly, the proportion of participants receiving antidepressants differed significantly by HADS score. Odds ratio for 'possible' versus 'no' depression was 2.79 (95% Cl = 1.70 to 4.58, P<0.001); and for 'probable' versus 'possible' was 2.12 (95% Cl = 1.21 to 3.70, P = 0.009). In 101 participants with 'probable' depression, GPs recognised 53 (52%) participants as having a clinically significant depression. Inappropriate initiation of antidepressant treatment occurred very infrequently. Prescribing to participants who were not symptomatic was accounted for by the treatment of pain, anxiety, or relapse prevention, and for ongoing treatment of previously identified depression.Conclusion There was little evidence of prescribing without relevant indication. Around half of patients with significant symptoms were not identified by their GP as suffering from a depressive disorder: this varied inversely with severity ratings. Rather than prescribing indiscriminately (as has been widely assumed), it is likely that GPs are initiating antidepressant treatment conservatively.

KW - adolescent

KW - adult

KW - aged

KW - antidepressive Agents

KW - clinical competence

KW - depressive disorder

KW - diagnostic errors

KW - family practice

KW - female

KW - humans

KW - male

KW - middle aged

KW - physician's practice patterns

KW - rural health

KW - Scotland

KW - unnecessary procedures

KW - urban health

KW - young adult

U2 - 10.3399/bjgp09X454061

DO - 10.3399/bjgp09X454061

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 644

EP - 649

JO - The British Journal of General Practice

JF - The British Journal of General Practice

SN - 0960-1643

IS - 566

ER -