Are Ranking Semantics Sensitive to the Notion of Core?

Bruno Yun, Madalina Croitoru, Pierre Bisquert

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we study the impact of two notions of core on the output of ranking semantics in logical argumentation frameworks. We consider the existential rules fragment, a language widely used in Semantic Web and Ontology Based Data Access applications. Using burden semantics as example we show how some ranking semantics yield different outputs on the argumentation graph and its cores. We extend existing results in the literature regarding core equivalences on logical argumentation frameworks and propose the first formal characterisation of core-induced modification for a class of ranking semantics satisfying given postulates.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, AAMAS 2017
Place of PublicationRichland
PublisherInternational Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
Pages943-951
Number of pages9
Publication statusPublished - May 2017
Event16th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2017 - Sao Paulo, Brazil
Duration: 8 May 201712 May 2017

Conference

Conference16th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2017
CountryBrazil
CitySao Paulo
Period8/05/1712/05/17

    Fingerprint

Cite this

Yun, B., Croitoru, M., & Bisquert, P. (2017). Are Ranking Semantics Sensitive to the Notion of Core? In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, AAMAS 2017 (pp. 943-951). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3091260