Are the pathogens of out-groups really more dangerous?

Micheal De Barra, Val Curtis

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We question the plausibility of Fincher & Thornhill’s (F&T’s)argument that localised pathogen-host coevolution leads to out-groups having pathogens more damaging than those infecting one’s own family or religious group
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-86
Number of pages2
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume35
Issue number2
Early online date31 Jan 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Are the pathogens of out-groups really more dangerous?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this