Assessing Walking Limitations in Stroke Survivors

Are Self-Reports and Proxy-Reports Interchangeable?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine the extent to which proxy-report measures adequately assess walking limitations and are interchangeable with self-report measures in stroke survivors. Design and Participants: Self-report, proxy-report, and observed performance measures of walking limitations were compared cross-sectionally on 3 occasions following the discharge from hospital of 101 stroke survivors. Correlations between measures, differences between mean scores, and agreement of self- and proxy reports were analyzed. Results and Conclusions: Self- and proxy-report measures correlated significantly with each other and with observed performance measures; differences between mean scores were not found. Agreement between individual self- and proxy-report pairs was poor, however, indicating that freely substituting proxy-report data for self-report data when self-report data are unavailable is inappropriate.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-183
Number of pages7
JournalRehabilitation Psychology
Volume52
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2007

Fingerprint

Proxy
Self Report
Walking
Stroke

Keywords

  • walking limitations
  • activity limitations
  • measurement
  • self-report
  • proxy-report
  • quality-of-life
  • disability
  • ratings
  • populations
  • reliability
  • recovery
  • accuracy
  • lessons
  • profile

Cite this

Assessing Walking Limitations in Stroke Survivors : Are Self-Reports and Proxy-Reports Interchangeable? / Powell, Rachael; Johnston, Marie; Johnston, Derek.

In: Rehabilitation Psychology, Vol. 52, No. 2, 05.2007, p. 177-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fa2a5d814bc94e70a351c35771923c8c,
title = "Assessing Walking Limitations in Stroke Survivors: Are Self-Reports and Proxy-Reports Interchangeable?",
abstract = "Objective: To examine the extent to which proxy-report measures adequately assess walking limitations and are interchangeable with self-report measures in stroke survivors. Design and Participants: Self-report, proxy-report, and observed performance measures of walking limitations were compared cross-sectionally on 3 occasions following the discharge from hospital of 101 stroke survivors. Correlations between measures, differences between mean scores, and agreement of self- and proxy reports were analyzed. Results and Conclusions: Self- and proxy-report measures correlated significantly with each other and with observed performance measures; differences between mean scores were not found. Agreement between individual self- and proxy-report pairs was poor, however, indicating that freely substituting proxy-report data for self-report data when self-report data are unavailable is inappropriate.",
keywords = "walking limitations, activity limitations, measurement, self-report, proxy-report, quality-of-life, disability, ratings, populations, reliability, recovery, accuracy, lessons, profile",
author = "Rachael Powell and Marie Johnston and Derek Johnston",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1037/0090-5550.52.2.177",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "177--183",
journal = "Rehabilitation Psychology",
issn = "0090-5550",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing Walking Limitations in Stroke Survivors

T2 - Are Self-Reports and Proxy-Reports Interchangeable?

AU - Powell, Rachael

AU - Johnston, Marie

AU - Johnston, Derek

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - Objective: To examine the extent to which proxy-report measures adequately assess walking limitations and are interchangeable with self-report measures in stroke survivors. Design and Participants: Self-report, proxy-report, and observed performance measures of walking limitations were compared cross-sectionally on 3 occasions following the discharge from hospital of 101 stroke survivors. Correlations between measures, differences between mean scores, and agreement of self- and proxy reports were analyzed. Results and Conclusions: Self- and proxy-report measures correlated significantly with each other and with observed performance measures; differences between mean scores were not found. Agreement between individual self- and proxy-report pairs was poor, however, indicating that freely substituting proxy-report data for self-report data when self-report data are unavailable is inappropriate.

AB - Objective: To examine the extent to which proxy-report measures adequately assess walking limitations and are interchangeable with self-report measures in stroke survivors. Design and Participants: Self-report, proxy-report, and observed performance measures of walking limitations were compared cross-sectionally on 3 occasions following the discharge from hospital of 101 stroke survivors. Correlations between measures, differences between mean scores, and agreement of self- and proxy reports were analyzed. Results and Conclusions: Self- and proxy-report measures correlated significantly with each other and with observed performance measures; differences between mean scores were not found. Agreement between individual self- and proxy-report pairs was poor, however, indicating that freely substituting proxy-report data for self-report data when self-report data are unavailable is inappropriate.

KW - walking limitations

KW - activity limitations

KW - measurement

KW - self-report

KW - proxy-report

KW - quality-of-life

KW - disability

KW - ratings

KW - populations

KW - reliability

KW - recovery

KW - accuracy

KW - lessons

KW - profile

U2 - 10.1037/0090-5550.52.2.177

DO - 10.1037/0090-5550.52.2.177

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 177

EP - 183

JO - Rehabilitation Psychology

JF - Rehabilitation Psychology

SN - 0090-5550

IS - 2

ER -