Barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative evidence

Tim Stokes, Elizabeth J Shaw, Janette Camosso-Stefinovic, Mari Imamura, Lovney Kanguru, Julia Hussein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maternal mortality remains a major international health problem in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), and most could have been prevented by quality improvement interventions already demonstrated to be effective, such as clinical guideline implementation strategies. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise qualitative evidence on guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in LMIC in order to identify barriers and enablers to their successful implementation.

METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and CINAHL databases for articles reporting research findings on barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies in obstetric care practice in LMIC. We conducted a "best fit" framework synthesis of the included studies. We used an organisational "stages of change" model as our a priori framework for the synthesis.

RESULTS: Nine studies were included: all were based in Sub-Saharan Africa and in hospital health care facilities. The majority of studies (seven) evaluated one particular guideline implementation strategy: clinical audit and feedback (both criterion-based audit and maternal death reviews), and a minority (two) evaluated educational interventions. A range of barriers and enablers to successful guideline implementation was identified. A key finding of the framework synthesis was that "high" and "low" intrinsic health care professional motivation are overall enablers and barriers, respectively, of successful guideline implementation. We developed a modified "stages of change" model to take account of these findings.

CONCLUSION: We have identified a number of quality improvement processes that are amenable to change at limited or no additional cost, although some identified barriers may be difficult to address without increased resources. We note the pathways to implementation may be complex and require further research to develop our understanding of individual and organisational behaviours and motivation in LMIC settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015016062.

Original languageEnglish
Article number144
JournalImplementation Science
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Oct 2016

Fingerprint

Obstetrics
Guidelines
Quality Improvement
Clinical Audit
Delivery of Health Care
Organizational Innovation
Maternal Death
Maternal Mortality
Africa South of the Sahara
Health Facilities
Research
MEDLINE
Databases
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • systematic review
  • qualitative synthesis
  • framework synthesis
  • guideline implementation
  • obstetrics
  • low- and middle-income countries

Cite this

Barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in low- and middle-income countries : a systematic review of qualitative evidence. / Stokes, Tim; Shaw, Elizabeth J; Camosso-Stefinovic, Janette; Imamura, Mari; Kanguru, Lovney; Hussein, Julia.

In: Implementation Science, Vol. 11, 144, 22.10.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b76e2b88f0af44daa30a7608c8d7610d,
title = "Barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative evidence",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Maternal mortality remains a major international health problem in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), and most could have been prevented by quality improvement interventions already demonstrated to be effective, such as clinical guideline implementation strategies. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise qualitative evidence on guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in LMIC in order to identify barriers and enablers to their successful implementation.METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and CINAHL databases for articles reporting research findings on barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies in obstetric care practice in LMIC. We conducted a {"}best fit{"} framework synthesis of the included studies. We used an organisational {"}stages of change{"} model as our a priori framework for the synthesis.RESULTS: Nine studies were included: all were based in Sub-Saharan Africa and in hospital health care facilities. The majority of studies (seven) evaluated one particular guideline implementation strategy: clinical audit and feedback (both criterion-based audit and maternal death reviews), and a minority (two) evaluated educational interventions. A range of barriers and enablers to successful guideline implementation was identified. A key finding of the framework synthesis was that {"}high{"} and {"}low{"} intrinsic health care professional motivation are overall enablers and barriers, respectively, of successful guideline implementation. We developed a modified {"}stages of change{"} model to take account of these findings.CONCLUSION: We have identified a number of quality improvement processes that are amenable to change at limited or no additional cost, although some identified barriers may be difficult to address without increased resources. We note the pathways to implementation may be complex and require further research to develop our understanding of individual and organisational behaviours and motivation in LMIC settings.TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015016062.",
keywords = "systematic review, qualitative synthesis, framework synthesis, guideline implementation, obstetrics , low- and middle-income countries",
author = "Tim Stokes and Shaw, {Elizabeth J} and Janette Camosso-Stefinovic and Mari Imamura and Lovney Kanguru and Julia Hussein",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1186/s13012-016-0508-1",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Implementation Science",
issn = "1748-5908",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in low- and middle-income countries

T2 - a systematic review of qualitative evidence

AU - Stokes, Tim

AU - Shaw, Elizabeth J

AU - Camosso-Stefinovic, Janette

AU - Imamura, Mari

AU - Kanguru, Lovney

AU - Hussein, Julia

PY - 2016/10/22

Y1 - 2016/10/22

N2 - BACKGROUND: Maternal mortality remains a major international health problem in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), and most could have been prevented by quality improvement interventions already demonstrated to be effective, such as clinical guideline implementation strategies. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise qualitative evidence on guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in LMIC in order to identify barriers and enablers to their successful implementation.METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and CINAHL databases for articles reporting research findings on barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies in obstetric care practice in LMIC. We conducted a "best fit" framework synthesis of the included studies. We used an organisational "stages of change" model as our a priori framework for the synthesis.RESULTS: Nine studies were included: all were based in Sub-Saharan Africa and in hospital health care facilities. The majority of studies (seven) evaluated one particular guideline implementation strategy: clinical audit and feedback (both criterion-based audit and maternal death reviews), and a minority (two) evaluated educational interventions. A range of barriers and enablers to successful guideline implementation was identified. A key finding of the framework synthesis was that "high" and "low" intrinsic health care professional motivation are overall enablers and barriers, respectively, of successful guideline implementation. We developed a modified "stages of change" model to take account of these findings.CONCLUSION: We have identified a number of quality improvement processes that are amenable to change at limited or no additional cost, although some identified barriers may be difficult to address without increased resources. We note the pathways to implementation may be complex and require further research to develop our understanding of individual and organisational behaviours and motivation in LMIC settings.TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015016062.

AB - BACKGROUND: Maternal mortality remains a major international health problem in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), and most could have been prevented by quality improvement interventions already demonstrated to be effective, such as clinical guideline implementation strategies. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise qualitative evidence on guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in LMIC in order to identify barriers and enablers to their successful implementation.METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and CINAHL databases for articles reporting research findings on barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies in obstetric care practice in LMIC. We conducted a "best fit" framework synthesis of the included studies. We used an organisational "stages of change" model as our a priori framework for the synthesis.RESULTS: Nine studies were included: all were based in Sub-Saharan Africa and in hospital health care facilities. The majority of studies (seven) evaluated one particular guideline implementation strategy: clinical audit and feedback (both criterion-based audit and maternal death reviews), and a minority (two) evaluated educational interventions. A range of barriers and enablers to successful guideline implementation was identified. A key finding of the framework synthesis was that "high" and "low" intrinsic health care professional motivation are overall enablers and barriers, respectively, of successful guideline implementation. We developed a modified "stages of change" model to take account of these findings.CONCLUSION: We have identified a number of quality improvement processes that are amenable to change at limited or no additional cost, although some identified barriers may be difficult to address without increased resources. We note the pathways to implementation may be complex and require further research to develop our understanding of individual and organisational behaviours and motivation in LMIC settings.TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015016062.

KW - systematic review

KW - qualitative synthesis

KW - framework synthesis

KW - guideline implementation

KW - obstetrics

KW - low- and middle-income countries

U2 - 10.1186/s13012-016-0508-1

DO - 10.1186/s13012-016-0508-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 27770807

VL - 11

JO - Implementation Science

JF - Implementation Science

SN - 1748-5908

M1 - 144

ER -