Beliefs about back pain and pain management behaviours, and their associations in the general population

a systematic review

L Morton* (Corresponding Author), M de Bruin, M Krajewska, D Whibley, G J Macfarlane

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Previous mass media campaigns have aimed to influence how people manage back pain, with mixed success. Campaigns should target beliefs which are related to the behaviours they aim to change. This systematic review brings together research that has measured the prevalence of beliefs about back pain in the general population and factors associated with these beliefs, including future pain-related outcomes. Five databases were searched up until April 2017. Quantitative studies which reported a measure of agreement with a belief about back pain, cross-sectional associations, or associations between beliefs and future outcomes were eligible. Eligibility was assessed and data extracted independently by two authors. Results were tabulated and narratively synthesized. Nineteen studies from 10 countries were eligible (median study n [IQR] = 990.5 [524.75–2387.5]). Beliefs were measured using eight questionnaires and 57 stand-alone items. Beliefs about back pain's negative consequences were common across countries and populations, whereas most samples did not hold fear-avoidance beliefs. Beliefs about back pain's consequences were associated with pain and disability, but only one study investigated this specific relationship prospectively. No studies investigated whether beliefs are associated with future pain management behaviours. Agreement with certain beliefs (e.g. about negative consequences) was associated with sociodemographic characteristics (e.g. older age) and poorer self-rated health. Interventions may benefit from targeting beliefs about the perceived negative consequences of back pain in these populations. However, future research should explore how beliefs prospectively influence the management of back pain. Significance: This review brings together studies which have assessed the prevalence of beliefs about back pain, and factors associated with holding them. It highlights that whether or not these beliefs represent important determinants of how people manage pain remains unknown.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-30
Number of pages16
JournalEuropean Journal of Pain
Volume23
Issue number1
Early online date7 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Pain Management
Back Pain
Population
Pain
Mass Media
Fear

Keywords

  • Attitude to Health
  • Back Pain/psychology
  • Fear
  • Health Behavior
  • Humans
  • Pain Management
  • Perception
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • MEDIA CAMPAIGN
  • PSYCHOLOGICAL-FACTORS
  • RESILIENCE
  • RISK
  • EDUCATION
  • IMPACT
  • PRIMARY-CARE
  • FEAR-AVOIDANCE BELIEFS
  • QUESTIONNAIRE
  • INTERVENTION

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Beliefs about back pain and pain management behaviours, and their associations in the general population : a systematic review. / Morton, L (Corresponding Author); de Bruin, M; Krajewska, M; Whibley, D; Macfarlane, G J.

In: European Journal of Pain, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.2019, p. 15-30.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ed1079f7deaa4401bdbcf762dbb85adb,
title = "Beliefs about back pain and pain management behaviours, and their associations in the general population: a systematic review",
abstract = "Previous mass media campaigns have aimed to influence how people manage back pain, with mixed success. Campaigns should target beliefs which are related to the behaviours they aim to change. This systematic review brings together research that has measured the prevalence of beliefs about back pain in the general population and factors associated with these beliefs, including future pain-related outcomes. Five databases were searched up until April 2017. Quantitative studies which reported a measure of agreement with a belief about back pain, cross-sectional associations, or associations between beliefs and future outcomes were eligible. Eligibility was assessed and data extracted independently by two authors. Results were tabulated and narratively synthesized. Nineteen studies from 10 countries were eligible (median study n [IQR] = 990.5 [524.75–2387.5]). Beliefs were measured using eight questionnaires and 57 stand-alone items. Beliefs about back pain's negative consequences were common across countries and populations, whereas most samples did not hold fear-avoidance beliefs. Beliefs about back pain's consequences were associated with pain and disability, but only one study investigated this specific relationship prospectively. No studies investigated whether beliefs are associated with future pain management behaviours. Agreement with certain beliefs (e.g. about negative consequences) was associated with sociodemographic characteristics (e.g. older age) and poorer self-rated health. Interventions may benefit from targeting beliefs about the perceived negative consequences of back pain in these populations. However, future research should explore how beliefs prospectively influence the management of back pain. Significance: This review brings together studies which have assessed the prevalence of beliefs about back pain, and factors associated with holding them. It highlights that whether or not these beliefs represent important determinants of how people manage pain remains unknown.",
keywords = "Attitude to Health, Back Pain/psychology, Fear, Health Behavior, Humans, Pain Management, Perception, Surveys and Questionnaires, MEDIA CAMPAIGN, PSYCHOLOGICAL-FACTORS, RESILIENCE, RISK, EDUCATION, IMPACT, PRIMARY-CARE, FEAR-AVOIDANCE BELIEFS, QUESTIONNAIRE, INTERVENTION",
author = "L Morton and {de Bruin}, M and M Krajewska and D Whibley and Macfarlane, {G J}",
note = "This work was supported by the Arthritis Research UK/Medical Research Council Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work (grant number: 20665).",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ejp.1285",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "15--30",
journal = "European Journal of Pain",
issn = "1090-3801",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beliefs about back pain and pain management behaviours, and their associations in the general population

T2 - a systematic review

AU - Morton, L

AU - de Bruin, M

AU - Krajewska, M

AU - Whibley, D

AU - Macfarlane, G J

N1 - This work was supported by the Arthritis Research UK/Medical Research Council Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work (grant number: 20665).

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - Previous mass media campaigns have aimed to influence how people manage back pain, with mixed success. Campaigns should target beliefs which are related to the behaviours they aim to change. This systematic review brings together research that has measured the prevalence of beliefs about back pain in the general population and factors associated with these beliefs, including future pain-related outcomes. Five databases were searched up until April 2017. Quantitative studies which reported a measure of agreement with a belief about back pain, cross-sectional associations, or associations between beliefs and future outcomes were eligible. Eligibility was assessed and data extracted independently by two authors. Results were tabulated and narratively synthesized. Nineteen studies from 10 countries were eligible (median study n [IQR] = 990.5 [524.75–2387.5]). Beliefs were measured using eight questionnaires and 57 stand-alone items. Beliefs about back pain's negative consequences were common across countries and populations, whereas most samples did not hold fear-avoidance beliefs. Beliefs about back pain's consequences were associated with pain and disability, but only one study investigated this specific relationship prospectively. No studies investigated whether beliefs are associated with future pain management behaviours. Agreement with certain beliefs (e.g. about negative consequences) was associated with sociodemographic characteristics (e.g. older age) and poorer self-rated health. Interventions may benefit from targeting beliefs about the perceived negative consequences of back pain in these populations. However, future research should explore how beliefs prospectively influence the management of back pain. Significance: This review brings together studies which have assessed the prevalence of beliefs about back pain, and factors associated with holding them. It highlights that whether or not these beliefs represent important determinants of how people manage pain remains unknown.

AB - Previous mass media campaigns have aimed to influence how people manage back pain, with mixed success. Campaigns should target beliefs which are related to the behaviours they aim to change. This systematic review brings together research that has measured the prevalence of beliefs about back pain in the general population and factors associated with these beliefs, including future pain-related outcomes. Five databases were searched up until April 2017. Quantitative studies which reported a measure of agreement with a belief about back pain, cross-sectional associations, or associations between beliefs and future outcomes were eligible. Eligibility was assessed and data extracted independently by two authors. Results were tabulated and narratively synthesized. Nineteen studies from 10 countries were eligible (median study n [IQR] = 990.5 [524.75–2387.5]). Beliefs were measured using eight questionnaires and 57 stand-alone items. Beliefs about back pain's negative consequences were common across countries and populations, whereas most samples did not hold fear-avoidance beliefs. Beliefs about back pain's consequences were associated with pain and disability, but only one study investigated this specific relationship prospectively. No studies investigated whether beliefs are associated with future pain management behaviours. Agreement with certain beliefs (e.g. about negative consequences) was associated with sociodemographic characteristics (e.g. older age) and poorer self-rated health. Interventions may benefit from targeting beliefs about the perceived negative consequences of back pain in these populations. However, future research should explore how beliefs prospectively influence the management of back pain. Significance: This review brings together studies which have assessed the prevalence of beliefs about back pain, and factors associated with holding them. It highlights that whether or not these beliefs represent important determinants of how people manage pain remains unknown.

KW - Attitude to Health

KW - Back Pain/psychology

KW - Fear

KW - Health Behavior

KW - Humans

KW - Pain Management

KW - Perception

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

KW - MEDIA CAMPAIGN

KW - PSYCHOLOGICAL-FACTORS

KW - RESILIENCE

KW - RISK

KW - EDUCATION

KW - IMPACT

KW - PRIMARY-CARE

KW - FEAR-AVOIDANCE BELIEFS

KW - QUESTIONNAIRE

KW - INTERVENTION

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052448969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/beliefs-about-back-pain-pain-management-behaviours-associations-general-population-systematic-review

U2 - 10.1002/ejp.1285

DO - 10.1002/ejp.1285

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 15

EP - 30

JO - European Journal of Pain

JF - European Journal of Pain

SN - 1090-3801

IS - 1

ER -