Between Conflict and Peace

An Analysis of the Complex Consequences of the Good Friday Agreement

John Nagle

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the two decades since signing, the GFA continues to generate acrimonious debate over whether it has brought about sustainable peace or fomented weak and sectarian governance institutions. In this article, I review the formation and outworking of the GFA. In so doing, I go beyond either/or analyses of the GFA to identify the complex forms of political agency it has generated not necessarily envisioned by the Agreement’s architects. I draw particular attention to the ways in which the central support beams of the Agreement – consociationalism and Europeanisation – have gradually become weakened to threaten the sustainability of power–sharing institutions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)395-416
Number of pages22
JournalParliamentary Affairs
Volume71
Issue number2
Early online date3 Sep 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

peace
Europeanization
architect
sustainability
governance

Keywords

  • Good Friday Agreement
  • Northern Ireland
  • Consociationalism
  • Brexit
  • Devolution

Cite this

Between Conflict and Peace : An Analysis of the Complex Consequences of the Good Friday Agreement. / Nagle, John.

In: Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 71, No. 2, 01.04.2018, p. 395-416.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Nagle, J 2018, 'Between Conflict and Peace: An Analysis of the Complex Consequences of the Good Friday Agreement', Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 395-416. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx030
Nagle J. Between Conflict and Peace: An Analysis of the Complex Consequences of the Good Friday Agreement. Parliamentary Affairs. 2018 Apr 1;71(2):395-416. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx030
Nagle, John. / Between Conflict and Peace : An Analysis of the Complex Consequences of the Good Friday Agreement. In: Parliamentary Affairs. 2018 ; Vol. 71, No. 2. pp. 395-416.
@article{301f91f4907f4e4182b2fed5ef50e54f,
title = "Between Conflict and Peace: An Analysis of the Complex Consequences of the Good Friday Agreement",
abstract = "In the two decades since signing, the GFA continues to generate acrimonious debate over whether it has brought about sustainable peace or fomented weak and sectarian governance institutions. In this article, I review the formation and outworking of the GFA. In so doing, I go beyond either/or analyses of the GFA to identify the complex forms of political agency it has generated not necessarily envisioned by the Agreement’s architects. I draw particular attention to the ways in which the central support beams of the Agreement – consociationalism and Europeanisation – have gradually become weakened to threaten the sustainability of power–sharing institutions.",
keywords = "Good Friday Agreement, Northern Ireland, Consociationalism, Brexit, Devolution",
author = "John Nagle",
note = "The author would like to thank the generous scholarship (Ref: 2017-616) provided by the Leverhulme Trust which has supported this work.",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/pa/gsx030",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "395--416",
journal = "Parliamentary Affairs",
issn = "0031-2290",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Between Conflict and Peace

T2 - An Analysis of the Complex Consequences of the Good Friday Agreement

AU - Nagle, John

N1 - The author would like to thank the generous scholarship (Ref: 2017-616) provided by the Leverhulme Trust which has supported this work.

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - In the two decades since signing, the GFA continues to generate acrimonious debate over whether it has brought about sustainable peace or fomented weak and sectarian governance institutions. In this article, I review the formation and outworking of the GFA. In so doing, I go beyond either/or analyses of the GFA to identify the complex forms of political agency it has generated not necessarily envisioned by the Agreement’s architects. I draw particular attention to the ways in which the central support beams of the Agreement – consociationalism and Europeanisation – have gradually become weakened to threaten the sustainability of power–sharing institutions.

AB - In the two decades since signing, the GFA continues to generate acrimonious debate over whether it has brought about sustainable peace or fomented weak and sectarian governance institutions. In this article, I review the formation and outworking of the GFA. In so doing, I go beyond either/or analyses of the GFA to identify the complex forms of political agency it has generated not necessarily envisioned by the Agreement’s architects. I draw particular attention to the ways in which the central support beams of the Agreement – consociationalism and Europeanisation – have gradually become weakened to threaten the sustainability of power–sharing institutions.

KW - Good Friday Agreement

KW - Northern Ireland

KW - Consociationalism

KW - Brexit

KW - Devolution

U2 - 10.1093/pa/gsx030

DO - 10.1093/pa/gsx030

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 395

EP - 416

JO - Parliamentary Affairs

JF - Parliamentary Affairs

SN - 0031-2290

IS - 2

ER -

Access to Document

  • Accepted Manuscript

    This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Parliamentary Affairs following peer review. The version of record John Nagle; Between Conflict and Peace: An Analysis of the Complex Consequences of the Good Friday Agreement, Parliamentary Affairs, Volume 71, Issue 2, 1 April 2018, Pages 395–416, is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx030.

    Accepted author manuscript, 145 KBLicence: Unspecified