Between Conflict and Peace: An Analysis of the Complex Consequences of the Good Friday Agreement

John Nagle

doi:10.1093/pa/gsx030

Between Conflict and Peace: An Analysis of the Complex Consequences of the Good Friday Agreement

John Nagle

Sociology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In the two decades since signing, the GFA continues to generate acrimonious debate over whether it has brought about sustainable peace or fomented weak and sectarian governance institutions. In this article, I review the formation and outworking of the GFA. In so doing, I go beyond either/or analyses of the GFA to identify the complex forms of political agency it has generated not necessarily envisioned by the Agreement’s architects. I draw particular attention to the ways in which the central support beams of the Agreement – consociationalism and Europeanisation – have gradually become weakened to threaten the sustainability of power–sharing institutions.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	395-416
Number of pages	22
Journal	Parliamentary Affairs
Volume	71
Issue number	2
Early online date	3 Sep 2017
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx030
Publication status	Published - 1 Apr 2018

Keywords

Good Friday Agreement
Northern Ireland
Consociationalism
Brexit
Devolution

Access to Document

10.1093/pa/gsx030Licence: Unspecified

Accepted Manuscript
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Parliamentary Affairs following peer review. The version of record John Nagle; Between Conflict and Peace: An Analysis of the Complex Consequences of the Good Friday Agreement, Parliamentary Affairs, Volume 71, Issue 2, 1 April 2018, Pages 395–416, is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx030.
Accepted author manuscript, 146 KBLicence: Unspecified

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Between Conflict and Peace: An Analysis of the Complex Consequences of the Good Friday Agreement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{301f91f4907f4e4182b2fed5ef50e54f,

title = "Between Conflict and Peace: An Analysis of the Complex Consequences of the Good Friday Agreement",

abstract = "In the two decades since signing, the GFA continues to generate acrimonious debate over whether it has brought about sustainable peace or fomented weak and sectarian governance institutions. In this article, I review the formation and outworking of the GFA. In so doing, I go beyond either/or analyses of the GFA to identify the complex forms of political agency it has generated not necessarily envisioned by the Agreement{\textquoteright}s architects. I draw particular attention to the ways in which the central support beams of the Agreement – consociationalism and Europeanisation – have gradually become weakened to threaten the sustainability of power–sharing institutions.",

keywords = "Good Friday Agreement, Northern Ireland, Consociationalism, Brexit, Devolution",

author = "John Nagle",

note = "The author would like to thank the generous scholarship (Ref: 2017-616) provided by the Leverhulme Trust which has supported this work. ",

year = "2018",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1093/pa/gsx030",

language = "English",

volume = "71",

pages = "395--416",

journal = "Parliamentary Affairs",

issn = "0031-2290",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Between Conflict and Peace

T2 - An Analysis of the Complex Consequences of the Good Friday Agreement

AU - Nagle, John

N1 - The author would like to thank the generous scholarship (Ref: 2017-616) provided by the Leverhulme Trust which has supported this work.

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - In the two decades since signing, the GFA continues to generate acrimonious debate over whether it has brought about sustainable peace or fomented weak and sectarian governance institutions. In this article, I review the formation and outworking of the GFA. In so doing, I go beyond either/or analyses of the GFA to identify the complex forms of political agency it has generated not necessarily envisioned by the Agreement’s architects. I draw particular attention to the ways in which the central support beams of the Agreement – consociationalism and Europeanisation – have gradually become weakened to threaten the sustainability of power–sharing institutions.

AB - In the two decades since signing, the GFA continues to generate acrimonious debate over whether it has brought about sustainable peace or fomented weak and sectarian governance institutions. In this article, I review the formation and outworking of the GFA. In so doing, I go beyond either/or analyses of the GFA to identify the complex forms of political agency it has generated not necessarily envisioned by the Agreement’s architects. I draw particular attention to the ways in which the central support beams of the Agreement – consociationalism and Europeanisation – have gradually become weakened to threaten the sustainability of power–sharing institutions.

KW - Good Friday Agreement

KW - Northern Ireland

KW - Consociationalism

KW - Brexit

KW - Devolution

U2 - 10.1093/pa/gsx030

DO - 10.1093/pa/gsx030

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 395

EP - 416

JO - Parliamentary Affairs

JF - Parliamentary Affairs

SN - 0031-2290

IS - 2

ER -