Body Mass Estimates in Dogs and North American Gray Wolves Using Limb Element Dimensions

R J Losey, K. McLachlin, T. Nomokonova, K. Latham, L. Harrington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Body mass is a key biometric that is useful in interpreting many aspects of an animal's life history. For many species, including dogs and wolves, methods for estimating body mass are not well developed. This paper assesses the utility of using limb dimensions to predict body mass in dogs and North American wolves. Regression analyses are utilized here to explore the correlations between limb dimensions and body masses of modern dogs and wolves, all of known body mass at death. These analyses reveal that a number of limb end dimensions are correlated with body mass in both dogs and wolves. Regression formulae generated through the analyses appear to allow body masses to be predicted with relatively small margins of error, often less than 10%. Formulae are calculated for groups with and without juveniles. In some cases, the dimensions of the juvenile specimens plot distinctly from those of adults, indicating that regression formulae specifically for juvenile canids may be needed. The strength of the limb dimension correlations is then compared with that of regression formulae for dog and wolf cranio-mandibular dimensions. For the dogs, the cranio-mandibular dimensions appear to slightly out-perform the limb element dimensions in predicting body mass. The wolf limb dimensions, however, always appear to provide better predictions of body mass than do the skull dimensions. The newly developed regression formulae are applied to several Middle Holocene dog skeletons from Siberia for which previous body mass estimates are available, the latter based on cranial dimensions. These two sets of estimates are then compared. The overall results of our study indicate the need for further research, particularly with larger sample sizes, including more juvenile specimens. We also argue that work on body size estimation in single dog breeds may be warranted in some cases. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)180–191
Number of pages12
JournalInternational journal of osteoarchaeology
Volume27
Issue number2
Early online date2 Jun 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2017

Fingerprint

regression
Dog
Siberia
animal
death
Group

Keywords

  • archaeology
  • body mass
  • canids
  • dogs
  • domestication
  • wolves

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Body Mass Estimates in Dogs and North American Gray Wolves Using Limb Element Dimensions. / Losey, R J; McLachlin, K.; Nomokonova, T.; Latham, K.; Harrington, L.

In: International journal of osteoarchaeology, Vol. 27, No. 2, 04.2017, p. 180–191 .

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Losey, R J ; McLachlin, K. ; Nomokonova, T. ; Latham, K. ; Harrington, L. / Body Mass Estimates in Dogs and North American Gray Wolves Using Limb Element Dimensions. In: International journal of osteoarchaeology. 2017 ; Vol. 27, No. 2. pp. 180–191 .
@article{ac9035d4b5e44c54a87f54637f30ea8c,
title = "Body Mass Estimates in Dogs and North American Gray Wolves Using Limb Element Dimensions",
abstract = "Body mass is a key biometric that is useful in interpreting many aspects of an animal's life history. For many species, including dogs and wolves, methods for estimating body mass are not well developed. This paper assesses the utility of using limb dimensions to predict body mass in dogs and North American wolves. Regression analyses are utilized here to explore the correlations between limb dimensions and body masses of modern dogs and wolves, all of known body mass at death. These analyses reveal that a number of limb end dimensions are correlated with body mass in both dogs and wolves. Regression formulae generated through the analyses appear to allow body masses to be predicted with relatively small margins of error, often less than 10{\%}. Formulae are calculated for groups with and without juveniles. In some cases, the dimensions of the juvenile specimens plot distinctly from those of adults, indicating that regression formulae specifically for juvenile canids may be needed. The strength of the limb dimension correlations is then compared with that of regression formulae for dog and wolf cranio-mandibular dimensions. For the dogs, the cranio-mandibular dimensions appear to slightly out-perform the limb element dimensions in predicting body mass. The wolf limb dimensions, however, always appear to provide better predictions of body mass than do the skull dimensions. The newly developed regression formulae are applied to several Middle Holocene dog skeletons from Siberia for which previous body mass estimates are available, the latter based on cranial dimensions. These two sets of estimates are then compared. The overall results of our study indicate the need for further research, particularly with larger sample sizes, including more juvenile specimens. We also argue that work on body size estimation in single dog breeds may be warranted in some cases. Copyright {\circledC} 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
keywords = "archaeology, body mass, canids , dogs, domestication, wolves",
author = "Losey, {R J} and K. McLachlin and T. Nomokonova and K. Latham and L. Harrington",
note = "Funded by Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. Grant Number: SSHRC IG 435-2014-0075, European Research Council. Grant Number: #295458",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1002/oa.2528",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "180–191",
journal = "International journal of osteoarchaeology",
issn = "1047-482X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Body Mass Estimates in Dogs and North American Gray Wolves Using Limb Element Dimensions

AU - Losey, R J

AU - McLachlin, K.

AU - Nomokonova, T.

AU - Latham, K.

AU - Harrington, L.

N1 - Funded by Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. Grant Number: SSHRC IG 435-2014-0075, European Research Council. Grant Number: #295458

PY - 2017/4

Y1 - 2017/4

N2 - Body mass is a key biometric that is useful in interpreting many aspects of an animal's life history. For many species, including dogs and wolves, methods for estimating body mass are not well developed. This paper assesses the utility of using limb dimensions to predict body mass in dogs and North American wolves. Regression analyses are utilized here to explore the correlations between limb dimensions and body masses of modern dogs and wolves, all of known body mass at death. These analyses reveal that a number of limb end dimensions are correlated with body mass in both dogs and wolves. Regression formulae generated through the analyses appear to allow body masses to be predicted with relatively small margins of error, often less than 10%. Formulae are calculated for groups with and without juveniles. In some cases, the dimensions of the juvenile specimens plot distinctly from those of adults, indicating that regression formulae specifically for juvenile canids may be needed. The strength of the limb dimension correlations is then compared with that of regression formulae for dog and wolf cranio-mandibular dimensions. For the dogs, the cranio-mandibular dimensions appear to slightly out-perform the limb element dimensions in predicting body mass. The wolf limb dimensions, however, always appear to provide better predictions of body mass than do the skull dimensions. The newly developed regression formulae are applied to several Middle Holocene dog skeletons from Siberia for which previous body mass estimates are available, the latter based on cranial dimensions. These two sets of estimates are then compared. The overall results of our study indicate the need for further research, particularly with larger sample sizes, including more juvenile specimens. We also argue that work on body size estimation in single dog breeds may be warranted in some cases. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AB - Body mass is a key biometric that is useful in interpreting many aspects of an animal's life history. For many species, including dogs and wolves, methods for estimating body mass are not well developed. This paper assesses the utility of using limb dimensions to predict body mass in dogs and North American wolves. Regression analyses are utilized here to explore the correlations between limb dimensions and body masses of modern dogs and wolves, all of known body mass at death. These analyses reveal that a number of limb end dimensions are correlated with body mass in both dogs and wolves. Regression formulae generated through the analyses appear to allow body masses to be predicted with relatively small margins of error, often less than 10%. Formulae are calculated for groups with and without juveniles. In some cases, the dimensions of the juvenile specimens plot distinctly from those of adults, indicating that regression formulae specifically for juvenile canids may be needed. The strength of the limb dimension correlations is then compared with that of regression formulae for dog and wolf cranio-mandibular dimensions. For the dogs, the cranio-mandibular dimensions appear to slightly out-perform the limb element dimensions in predicting body mass. The wolf limb dimensions, however, always appear to provide better predictions of body mass than do the skull dimensions. The newly developed regression formulae are applied to several Middle Holocene dog skeletons from Siberia for which previous body mass estimates are available, the latter based on cranial dimensions. These two sets of estimates are then compared. The overall results of our study indicate the need for further research, particularly with larger sample sizes, including more juvenile specimens. We also argue that work on body size estimation in single dog breeds may be warranted in some cases. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

KW - archaeology

KW - body mass

KW - canids

KW - dogs

KW - domestication

KW - wolves

U2 - 10.1002/oa.2528

DO - 10.1002/oa.2528

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 180

EP - 191

JO - International journal of osteoarchaeology

JF - International journal of osteoarchaeology

SN - 1047-482X

IS - 2

ER -