Can we predict bleeding?

Henry G. Watson, Mike Greaves

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The prior identification. of subjects who are likely to bleed excessively when subjected to operative surgery and other invasive procedures is desirable. Frequently, reliance is placed on laboratory-based screening tests of blood coagulation for this purpose. However, published evidence does not support this approach as the tests are not fit for purpose, and their sensitivity and specificity are low. Some more global assays may have use in the diagnostic workup in subjects with hemorrhage, but none has been established to date as an efficient method for prediction of bleeding in unselected populations. There is renewed interest in the use of the clinical history for the prediction of bleeding. Recent reports suggest that when a structured questionnaire is employed to derive a bleeding score, the positive predictive value of the approach for the detection of bleeding disorders is high.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-103
Number of pages7
JournalSeminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Keywords

  • bleeding
  • preoperative screening
  • coagulation tests
  • global coagulation assays
  • platelet-function analyzer
  • Von-Willebrand-Disease
  • partial thromboplastin time
  • (PFA)-100(R) closure time
  • aspirin nonresponsiveness
  • postoperative hemorrhage
  • coagulation disorders
  • thrombin generation
  • cardiac-surgery
  • function assay

Cite this

Can we predict bleeding? / Watson, Henry G.; Greaves, Mike.

In: Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2008, p. 97-103.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Watson, Henry G. ; Greaves, Mike. / Can we predict bleeding?. In: Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis. 2008 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 97-103.
@article{a913a1aeacce4769aedb428ce34dc117,
title = "Can we predict bleeding?",
abstract = "The prior identification. of subjects who are likely to bleed excessively when subjected to operative surgery and other invasive procedures is desirable. Frequently, reliance is placed on laboratory-based screening tests of blood coagulation for this purpose. However, published evidence does not support this approach as the tests are not fit for purpose, and their sensitivity and specificity are low. Some more global assays may have use in the diagnostic workup in subjects with hemorrhage, but none has been established to date as an efficient method for prediction of bleeding in unselected populations. There is renewed interest in the use of the clinical history for the prediction of bleeding. Recent reports suggest that when a structured questionnaire is employed to derive a bleeding score, the positive predictive value of the approach for the detection of bleeding disorders is high.",
keywords = "bleeding, preoperative screening, coagulation tests, global coagulation assays, platelet-function analyzer, Von-Willebrand-Disease, partial thromboplastin time, (PFA)-100(R) closure time, aspirin nonresponsiveness, postoperative hemorrhage, coagulation disorders, thrombin generation, cardiac-surgery, function assay",
author = "Watson, {Henry G.} and Mike Greaves",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1055/s-2008-1066028",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "97--103",
journal = "Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis",
issn = "0094-6176",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can we predict bleeding?

AU - Watson, Henry G.

AU - Greaves, Mike

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The prior identification. of subjects who are likely to bleed excessively when subjected to operative surgery and other invasive procedures is desirable. Frequently, reliance is placed on laboratory-based screening tests of blood coagulation for this purpose. However, published evidence does not support this approach as the tests are not fit for purpose, and their sensitivity and specificity are low. Some more global assays may have use in the diagnostic workup in subjects with hemorrhage, but none has been established to date as an efficient method for prediction of bleeding in unselected populations. There is renewed interest in the use of the clinical history for the prediction of bleeding. Recent reports suggest that when a structured questionnaire is employed to derive a bleeding score, the positive predictive value of the approach for the detection of bleeding disorders is high.

AB - The prior identification. of subjects who are likely to bleed excessively when subjected to operative surgery and other invasive procedures is desirable. Frequently, reliance is placed on laboratory-based screening tests of blood coagulation for this purpose. However, published evidence does not support this approach as the tests are not fit for purpose, and their sensitivity and specificity are low. Some more global assays may have use in the diagnostic workup in subjects with hemorrhage, but none has been established to date as an efficient method for prediction of bleeding in unselected populations. There is renewed interest in the use of the clinical history for the prediction of bleeding. Recent reports suggest that when a structured questionnaire is employed to derive a bleeding score, the positive predictive value of the approach for the detection of bleeding disorders is high.

KW - bleeding

KW - preoperative screening

KW - coagulation tests

KW - global coagulation assays

KW - platelet-function analyzer

KW - Von-Willebrand-Disease

KW - partial thromboplastin time

KW - (PFA)-100(R) closure time

KW - aspirin nonresponsiveness

KW - postoperative hemorrhage

KW - coagulation disorders

KW - thrombin generation

KW - cardiac-surgery

KW - function assay

U2 - 10.1055/s-2008-1066028

DO - 10.1055/s-2008-1066028

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 97

EP - 103

JO - Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis

JF - Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis

SN - 0094-6176

IS - 1

ER -