Comparing Nations and States: Human Rights and Democracy in India

Neil James Mitchell, C. Beer

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    36 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Democracy and the protection of human rights generally go together, but not in India. India is an outlier in the cross-national research that aims to explain human rights performance. Using state-level subnational data and drawing on the approaches pioneered at the cross-national level, the authors examine the reasons for the outlier status. Their findings suggest that the aggregate whole-nation human rights and democracy scores misrepresent the political experience of much of India. The authors find that participation, political parties, and the level and nature of opposition threat help us understand the incidence of human fights violations within India.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)996-1018
    Number of pages22
    JournalComparative Political Studies
    Volume39
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2006

    Keywords

    • India
    • human rights
    • subnational politics
    • elections
    • REPRESSION
    • KASHMIR
    • WAR
    • INSURGENCY
    • GOVERNMENT

    Cite this

    Comparing Nations and States: Human Rights and Democracy in India. / Mitchell, Neil James; Beer, C.

    In: Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 39, No. 8, 10.2006, p. 996-1018.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Mitchell, Neil James ; Beer, C. / Comparing Nations and States: Human Rights and Democracy in India. In: Comparative Political Studies. 2006 ; Vol. 39, No. 8. pp. 996-1018.
    @article{db089881f1ef4b699e8df63199b9ade2,
    title = "Comparing Nations and States: Human Rights and Democracy in India",
    abstract = "Democracy and the protection of human rights generally go together, but not in India. India is an outlier in the cross-national research that aims to explain human rights performance. Using state-level subnational data and drawing on the approaches pioneered at the cross-national level, the authors examine the reasons for the outlier status. Their findings suggest that the aggregate whole-nation human rights and democracy scores misrepresent the political experience of much of India. The authors find that participation, political parties, and the level and nature of opposition threat help us understand the incidence of human fights violations within India.",
    keywords = "India, human rights, subnational politics, elections, REPRESSION, KASHMIR, WAR, INSURGENCY, GOVERNMENT",
    author = "Mitchell, {Neil James} and C. Beer",
    year = "2006",
    month = "10",
    doi = "10.1177/0010414005282392",
    language = "English",
    volume = "39",
    pages = "996--1018",
    journal = "Comparative Political Studies",
    issn = "0010-4140",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
    number = "8",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Comparing Nations and States: Human Rights and Democracy in India

    AU - Mitchell, Neil James

    AU - Beer, C.

    PY - 2006/10

    Y1 - 2006/10

    N2 - Democracy and the protection of human rights generally go together, but not in India. India is an outlier in the cross-national research that aims to explain human rights performance. Using state-level subnational data and drawing on the approaches pioneered at the cross-national level, the authors examine the reasons for the outlier status. Their findings suggest that the aggregate whole-nation human rights and democracy scores misrepresent the political experience of much of India. The authors find that participation, political parties, and the level and nature of opposition threat help us understand the incidence of human fights violations within India.

    AB - Democracy and the protection of human rights generally go together, but not in India. India is an outlier in the cross-national research that aims to explain human rights performance. Using state-level subnational data and drawing on the approaches pioneered at the cross-national level, the authors examine the reasons for the outlier status. Their findings suggest that the aggregate whole-nation human rights and democracy scores misrepresent the political experience of much of India. The authors find that participation, political parties, and the level and nature of opposition threat help us understand the incidence of human fights violations within India.

    KW - India

    KW - human rights

    KW - subnational politics

    KW - elections

    KW - REPRESSION

    KW - KASHMIR

    KW - WAR

    KW - INSURGENCY

    KW - GOVERNMENT

    U2 - 10.1177/0010414005282392

    DO - 10.1177/0010414005282392

    M3 - Article

    VL - 39

    SP - 996

    EP - 1018

    JO - Comparative Political Studies

    JF - Comparative Political Studies

    SN - 0010-4140

    IS - 8

    ER -