Comparison of anaesthetists' activity patterns in the operating room and during simulation

Tanja Manser, P. Dieckmann, T. Wehner, M. Rall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated the behavioural aspects of ecological validity of anaesthesia simulation environments using a task analysis approach. Six anaesthesists were observed during two cases performed in the operating room (OR), one routine and two critical incident simulation scenarios. A two-way MANOVA for repeated measures was performed with the independent variables Case (OR/SIM-R/SIM-CI) and Phase Induction/ Maintenance (Emergence), the latter being a repeated measure. Dependent variables were the proportion of each phase spent on each of the observation categories. Statistically significant main effects for Phase concerning communication, monitoring, manual tasks and documentation, for Case concerning communication and documentation, and a significant interaction effect for Phase x Case concerning manual tasks and other were found. Increased action density (i.e. amount of co-occurring activities) was observed during Induction, Emergence and the Management of simulated critical events. The similarities and differences in anaesthetists' activity patterns identified in this study will help to further improve the ecological validity of simulation environments as research settings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)246-260
Number of pages15
JournalErgonomics
Volume50
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Operating rooms
Operating Rooms
Documentation
Manual Communication
induction
simulation
documentation
Communication
Anesthesia
communication
Maintenance
Observation
Monitoring
incident
Research
monitoring
scenario
event
interaction
management

Keywords

  • anesthesiology
  • computer simulation
  • humans
  • operating rooms
  • reproducibility of results
  • task performance and analysis
  • high-fidelity simulator
  • virtual-reality
  • neonatal resuscitation
  • laparascopic surgery
  • prospecticve memory
  • patient safety
  • health-care
  • anesthesia
  • performance
  • workload

Cite this

Comparison of anaesthetists' activity patterns in the operating room and during simulation. / Manser, Tanja; Dieckmann, P.; Wehner, T.; Rall, M.

In: Ergonomics, Vol. 50, No. 2, 2007, p. 246-260.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Manser, Tanja ; Dieckmann, P. ; Wehner, T. ; Rall, M. / Comparison of anaesthetists' activity patterns in the operating room and during simulation. In: Ergonomics. 2007 ; Vol. 50, No. 2. pp. 246-260.
@article{5cfcc6693c224ecab655317933afec3f,
title = "Comparison of anaesthetists' activity patterns in the operating room and during simulation",
abstract = "This study investigated the behavioural aspects of ecological validity of anaesthesia simulation environments using a task analysis approach. Six anaesthesists were observed during two cases performed in the operating room (OR), one routine and two critical incident simulation scenarios. A two-way MANOVA for repeated measures was performed with the independent variables Case (OR/SIM-R/SIM-CI) and Phase Induction/ Maintenance (Emergence), the latter being a repeated measure. Dependent variables were the proportion of each phase spent on each of the observation categories. Statistically significant main effects for Phase concerning communication, monitoring, manual tasks and documentation, for Case concerning communication and documentation, and a significant interaction effect for Phase x Case concerning manual tasks and other were found. Increased action density (i.e. amount of co-occurring activities) was observed during Induction, Emergence and the Management of simulated critical events. The similarities and differences in anaesthetists' activity patterns identified in this study will help to further improve the ecological validity of simulation environments as research settings.",
keywords = "anesthesiology, computer simulation , humans, operating rooms, reproducibility of results, task performance and analysis, high-fidelity simulator, virtual-reality, neonatal resuscitation, laparascopic surgery, prospecticve memory, patient safety, health-care, anesthesia, performance , workload",
author = "Tanja Manser and P. Dieckmann and T. Wehner and M. Rall",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1080/00140130601032655",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "246--260",
journal = "Ergonomics",
issn = "0014-0139",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of anaesthetists' activity patterns in the operating room and during simulation

AU - Manser, Tanja

AU - Dieckmann, P.

AU - Wehner, T.

AU - Rall, M.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This study investigated the behavioural aspects of ecological validity of anaesthesia simulation environments using a task analysis approach. Six anaesthesists were observed during two cases performed in the operating room (OR), one routine and two critical incident simulation scenarios. A two-way MANOVA for repeated measures was performed with the independent variables Case (OR/SIM-R/SIM-CI) and Phase Induction/ Maintenance (Emergence), the latter being a repeated measure. Dependent variables were the proportion of each phase spent on each of the observation categories. Statistically significant main effects for Phase concerning communication, monitoring, manual tasks and documentation, for Case concerning communication and documentation, and a significant interaction effect for Phase x Case concerning manual tasks and other were found. Increased action density (i.e. amount of co-occurring activities) was observed during Induction, Emergence and the Management of simulated critical events. The similarities and differences in anaesthetists' activity patterns identified in this study will help to further improve the ecological validity of simulation environments as research settings.

AB - This study investigated the behavioural aspects of ecological validity of anaesthesia simulation environments using a task analysis approach. Six anaesthesists were observed during two cases performed in the operating room (OR), one routine and two critical incident simulation scenarios. A two-way MANOVA for repeated measures was performed with the independent variables Case (OR/SIM-R/SIM-CI) and Phase Induction/ Maintenance (Emergence), the latter being a repeated measure. Dependent variables were the proportion of each phase spent on each of the observation categories. Statistically significant main effects for Phase concerning communication, monitoring, manual tasks and documentation, for Case concerning communication and documentation, and a significant interaction effect for Phase x Case concerning manual tasks and other were found. Increased action density (i.e. amount of co-occurring activities) was observed during Induction, Emergence and the Management of simulated critical events. The similarities and differences in anaesthetists' activity patterns identified in this study will help to further improve the ecological validity of simulation environments as research settings.

KW - anesthesiology

KW - computer simulation

KW - humans

KW - operating rooms

KW - reproducibility of results

KW - task performance and analysis

KW - high-fidelity simulator

KW - virtual-reality

KW - neonatal resuscitation

KW - laparascopic surgery

KW - prospecticve memory

KW - patient safety

KW - health-care

KW - anesthesia

KW - performance

KW - workload

U2 - 10.1080/00140130601032655

DO - 10.1080/00140130601032655

M3 - Article

C2 - 17419157

VL - 50

SP - 246

EP - 260

JO - Ergonomics

JF - Ergonomics

SN - 0014-0139

IS - 2

ER -