TY - JOUR
T1 - Cutting through and going along
T2 - A comment on knowing by singing
AU - Ingold, Tim
N1 - Funding Information:
The research on which this article is based was funded, in part, by an Advanced Grant from the European Research Council (Knowing from the Inside: Anthropology, Art, Architecture and Design, 323577-KFI, 2013–2018). I am grateful to the council for its support.
PY - 2022/12/12
Y1 - 2022/12/12
N2 - Seeing and reading are often thought to pull in contrary directions: as text is nonvisual, vision is nontextual. This assumes both seeing and reading are cognitive operations that cut through the surface of inscription to recover meaning from behind. Yet reading handwriting involves an attention that enters into surface texture and goes along with its lines, rather than cutting through. Here, seeing and reading afford equivalent ways of watching-listening. To listen, as to watch, is to follow an unfolding movement. Both are modalities of observation. But where observation submits to movement, objectification stops it up. Attempts to combine observation and objectification founder on their contradiction, as attested in encounters both between deaf communities and mainstream institutions, and between Indigenous peoples and the forces of colonization. Yet the charges leveled against the latter, of ocularcentrism and scriptism, signify not the prioritization of eyesight and writing but a cognitive style that withdraws the eye from the world even as it withdraws words from script. The same style divides song into components of verbal text and embodied practice. A body that is animate, however, sings its way productively into the world. Knowing by singing offers a way to enter into this productive process.
AB - Seeing and reading are often thought to pull in contrary directions: as text is nonvisual, vision is nontextual. This assumes both seeing and reading are cognitive operations that cut through the surface of inscription to recover meaning from behind. Yet reading handwriting involves an attention that enters into surface texture and goes along with its lines, rather than cutting through. Here, seeing and reading afford equivalent ways of watching-listening. To listen, as to watch, is to follow an unfolding movement. Both are modalities of observation. But where observation submits to movement, objectification stops it up. Attempts to combine observation and objectification founder on their contradiction, as attested in encounters both between deaf communities and mainstream institutions, and between Indigenous peoples and the forces of colonization. Yet the charges leveled against the latter, of ocularcentrism and scriptism, signify not the prioritization of eyesight and writing but a cognitive style that withdraws the eye from the world even as it withdraws words from script. The same style divides song into components of verbal text and embodied practice. A body that is animate, however, sings its way productively into the world. Knowing by singing offers a way to enter into this productive process.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140226324&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/aman.13786
DO - 10.1111/aman.13786
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85140226324
VL - 124
SP - 885
EP - 890
JO - American Anthropologist
JF - American Anthropologist
SN - 0002-7294
IS - 4
ER -