Determinants of the Pension Curtailment Decisions of UK Firms

Mark Whittington, Paul Klumpes, Yong Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During the last ten years of regulatory change, manyUKcompanies have curtailed their defined benefit pension scheme.We test three competing explanations of UK corporate pension curtailments: integration, separation and risk management. We predict and find an association between the use of managerial discretion over changes in UK firms’ expected rate of return on pension assets (ERR) assumptions, and subsequent decisions to curtail future defined benefit
pension obligations. These findings are consistent with a risk management-based explanation, even after controlling for other factors identified by prior literature as significant in explaining pension benefit reductions. We also find that curtailments and the risk management of ERR assumptions are associated with subsequent corporate restructuring decisions. The findings support the view that pension curtailment decisions are driven by the failure to adapt to new economic and regulatory pressures and that they are ultimately determined by strategic corporate risk management considerations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)899-924
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of business finance & accounting
Volume36
Issue number7-8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

Pensions
Risk management
Factors
Economics
Defined benefit
Corporate risk management
Pension scheme
Regulatory change
Assets
Rate of return
Obligation
Managerial discretion
Corporate restructuring

Keywords

  • ERR assumptions
  • pension curtailment decision

Cite this

Determinants of the Pension Curtailment Decisions of UK Firms. / Whittington, Mark; Klumpes, Paul; Li, Yong.

In: Journal of business finance & accounting, Vol. 36, No. 7-8, 09.2009, p. 899-924.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a2a97b15973446fa8fcfa145d62efc80,
title = "Determinants of the Pension Curtailment Decisions of UK Firms",
abstract = "During the last ten years of regulatory change, manyUKcompanies have curtailed their defined benefit pension scheme.We test three competing explanations of UK corporate pension curtailments: integration, separation and risk management. We predict and find an association between the use of managerial discretion over changes in UK firms’ expected rate of return on pension assets (ERR) assumptions, and subsequent decisions to curtail future defined benefit pension obligations. These findings are consistent with a risk management-based explanation, even after controlling for other factors identified by prior literature as significant in explaining pension benefit reductions. We also find that curtailments and the risk management of ERR assumptions are associated with subsequent corporate restructuring decisions. The findings support the view that pension curtailment decisions are driven by the failure to adapt to new economic and regulatory pressures and that they are ultimately determined by strategic corporate risk management considerations.",
keywords = "ERR assumptions, pension curtailment decision",
author = "Mark Whittington and Paul Klumpes and Yong Li",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02160.x",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "899--924",
journal = "Journal of Business Finance and Accounting",
issn = "0306-686X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7-8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determinants of the Pension Curtailment Decisions of UK Firms

AU - Whittington, Mark

AU - Klumpes, Paul

AU - Li, Yong

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - During the last ten years of regulatory change, manyUKcompanies have curtailed their defined benefit pension scheme.We test three competing explanations of UK corporate pension curtailments: integration, separation and risk management. We predict and find an association between the use of managerial discretion over changes in UK firms’ expected rate of return on pension assets (ERR) assumptions, and subsequent decisions to curtail future defined benefit pension obligations. These findings are consistent with a risk management-based explanation, even after controlling for other factors identified by prior literature as significant in explaining pension benefit reductions. We also find that curtailments and the risk management of ERR assumptions are associated with subsequent corporate restructuring decisions. The findings support the view that pension curtailment decisions are driven by the failure to adapt to new economic and regulatory pressures and that they are ultimately determined by strategic corporate risk management considerations.

AB - During the last ten years of regulatory change, manyUKcompanies have curtailed their defined benefit pension scheme.We test three competing explanations of UK corporate pension curtailments: integration, separation and risk management. We predict and find an association between the use of managerial discretion over changes in UK firms’ expected rate of return on pension assets (ERR) assumptions, and subsequent decisions to curtail future defined benefit pension obligations. These findings are consistent with a risk management-based explanation, even after controlling for other factors identified by prior literature as significant in explaining pension benefit reductions. We also find that curtailments and the risk management of ERR assumptions are associated with subsequent corporate restructuring decisions. The findings support the view that pension curtailment decisions are driven by the failure to adapt to new economic and regulatory pressures and that they are ultimately determined by strategic corporate risk management considerations.

KW - ERR assumptions

KW - pension curtailment decision

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02160.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02160.x

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 899

EP - 924

JO - Journal of Business Finance and Accounting

JF - Journal of Business Finance and Accounting

SN - 0306-686X

IS - 7-8

ER -