Development of a behavioural marker system for scrub practitioners' non-technical skills (SPLINTS system)

Lucy Mitchell (Corresponding Author), Rhona Flin, Steven Yule, Janet Mitchell, Kathy Coutts, George Youngson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale, aims and objectives Adverse events still occur despite ongoing efforts to reduce harm to patients. Contributory factors to adverse events are often due to limitations in clinicians’ non-technical skills (e.g. communication, situation awareness), rather than deficiencies in technical competence. We developed a behavioural rating system to provide a structured means for teaching and assessing scrub practitioners’ (i.e. nurse, technician, operating department practitioner) non-technical skills.

Method Psychologists facilitated focus groups (n = 4) with experienced scrub practitioners (n = 16; 4 in each group) to develop a preliminary taxonomy. Focus groups reviewed lists of non-technical-skill-related behaviours that were extracted from an interview study. The focus groups labelled skill categories and elements and also provided examples of good and poor behaviours for those skills. An expert panel (n = 2 psychologists; n = 1 expert nurse) then used an iterative process to individually and collaboratively review and refine those data to produce a prototype skills taxonomy.

Results A preliminary taxonomy containing eight non-technical skill categories with 28 underlying elements was produced. The expert panel reduced this to three categories (situation awareness, communication and teamwork, task management), each with three underlying elements. The system was called the Scrub Practitioners’ List of Intraoperative Non-Technical Skills system. A scoring system and a user handbook were also developed.

Conclusion A prototype behavioural rating system for scrub practitioners’ non-technical skills was developed, to aid in teaching and providing formative assessment. This important aspect of performance is not currently explicitly addressed in any educational route to qualify as a scrub practitioner.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-323
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Volume19
Issue number2
Early online date15 Apr 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Focus Groups
Teaching
Communication
Psychology
Patient Harm
Nurse Practitioners
Mental Competency
Nurses
Interviews

Keywords

  • marker system
  • non-technical skill
  • nurse
  • scrub practitioner
  • SPLINTS

Cite this

Development of a behavioural marker system for scrub practitioners' non-technical skills (SPLINTS system). / Mitchell, Lucy (Corresponding Author); Flin, Rhona; Yule, Steven; Mitchell, Janet; Coutts, Kathy; Youngson, George.

In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 19, No. 2, 04.2013, p. 317-323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9486318ac77946689dd185db32280b28,
title = "Development of a behavioural marker system for scrub practitioners' non-technical skills (SPLINTS system)",
abstract = "Rationale, aims and objectives Adverse events still occur despite ongoing efforts to reduce harm to patients. Contributory factors to adverse events are often due to limitations in clinicians’ non-technical skills (e.g. communication, situation awareness), rather than deficiencies in technical competence. We developed a behavioural rating system to provide a structured means for teaching and assessing scrub practitioners’ (i.e. nurse, technician, operating department practitioner) non-technical skills. Method Psychologists facilitated focus groups (n = 4) with experienced scrub practitioners (n = 16; 4 in each group) to develop a preliminary taxonomy. Focus groups reviewed lists of non-technical-skill-related behaviours that were extracted from an interview study. The focus groups labelled skill categories and elements and also provided examples of good and poor behaviours for those skills. An expert panel (n = 2 psychologists; n = 1 expert nurse) then used an iterative process to individually and collaboratively review and refine those data to produce a prototype skills taxonomy. Results A preliminary taxonomy containing eight non-technical skill categories with 28 underlying elements was produced. The expert panel reduced this to three categories (situation awareness, communication and teamwork, task management), each with three underlying elements. The system was called the Scrub Practitioners’ List of Intraoperative Non-Technical Skills system. A scoring system and a user handbook were also developed. Conclusion A prototype behavioural rating system for scrub practitioners’ non-technical skills was developed, to aid in teaching and providing formative assessment. This important aspect of performance is not currently explicitly addressed in any educational route to qualify as a scrub practitioner.",
keywords = "marker system, non-technical skill, nurse, scrub practitioner, SPLINTS",
author = "Lucy Mitchell and Rhona Flin and Steven Yule and Janet Mitchell and Kathy Coutts and George Youngson",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01825.x",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "317--323",
journal = "Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice",
issn = "1356-1294",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of a behavioural marker system for scrub practitioners' non-technical skills (SPLINTS system)

AU - Mitchell, Lucy

AU - Flin, Rhona

AU - Yule, Steven

AU - Mitchell, Janet

AU - Coutts, Kathy

AU - Youngson, George

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Rationale, aims and objectives Adverse events still occur despite ongoing efforts to reduce harm to patients. Contributory factors to adverse events are often due to limitations in clinicians’ non-technical skills (e.g. communication, situation awareness), rather than deficiencies in technical competence. We developed a behavioural rating system to provide a structured means for teaching and assessing scrub practitioners’ (i.e. nurse, technician, operating department practitioner) non-technical skills. Method Psychologists facilitated focus groups (n = 4) with experienced scrub practitioners (n = 16; 4 in each group) to develop a preliminary taxonomy. Focus groups reviewed lists of non-technical-skill-related behaviours that were extracted from an interview study. The focus groups labelled skill categories and elements and also provided examples of good and poor behaviours for those skills. An expert panel (n = 2 psychologists; n = 1 expert nurse) then used an iterative process to individually and collaboratively review and refine those data to produce a prototype skills taxonomy. Results A preliminary taxonomy containing eight non-technical skill categories with 28 underlying elements was produced. The expert panel reduced this to three categories (situation awareness, communication and teamwork, task management), each with three underlying elements. The system was called the Scrub Practitioners’ List of Intraoperative Non-Technical Skills system. A scoring system and a user handbook were also developed. Conclusion A prototype behavioural rating system for scrub practitioners’ non-technical skills was developed, to aid in teaching and providing formative assessment. This important aspect of performance is not currently explicitly addressed in any educational route to qualify as a scrub practitioner.

AB - Rationale, aims and objectives Adverse events still occur despite ongoing efforts to reduce harm to patients. Contributory factors to adverse events are often due to limitations in clinicians’ non-technical skills (e.g. communication, situation awareness), rather than deficiencies in technical competence. We developed a behavioural rating system to provide a structured means for teaching and assessing scrub practitioners’ (i.e. nurse, technician, operating department practitioner) non-technical skills. Method Psychologists facilitated focus groups (n = 4) with experienced scrub practitioners (n = 16; 4 in each group) to develop a preliminary taxonomy. Focus groups reviewed lists of non-technical-skill-related behaviours that were extracted from an interview study. The focus groups labelled skill categories and elements and also provided examples of good and poor behaviours for those skills. An expert panel (n = 2 psychologists; n = 1 expert nurse) then used an iterative process to individually and collaboratively review and refine those data to produce a prototype skills taxonomy. Results A preliminary taxonomy containing eight non-technical skill categories with 28 underlying elements was produced. The expert panel reduced this to three categories (situation awareness, communication and teamwork, task management), each with three underlying elements. The system was called the Scrub Practitioners’ List of Intraoperative Non-Technical Skills system. A scoring system and a user handbook were also developed. Conclusion A prototype behavioural rating system for scrub practitioners’ non-technical skills was developed, to aid in teaching and providing formative assessment. This important aspect of performance is not currently explicitly addressed in any educational route to qualify as a scrub practitioner.

KW - marker system

KW - non-technical skill

KW - nurse

KW - scrub practitioner

KW - SPLINTS

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01825.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01825.x

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 317

EP - 323

JO - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

JF - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

SN - 1356-1294

IS - 2

ER -