Different impacts of resources on opposite sex ratings of physical attractiveness by males and females

Guanlin Wang, Minxuan Cao, Justina Sauciuvenaite, Ruth Bissland, Megan Hacker, Catherine Hambly, Lobke M. Vaanholt, Chaoqun Niu, Mark D. Faries, John R. Speakman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Parental investment hypotheses regarding mate selection suggest that human males should seek partners featured by youth and high fertility. However, females should be more sensitive to resources that can be invested on themselves and their offspring. Previous studies indicate that economic status is indeed important in male attractiveness. However, no previous study has quantified and compared the impact of equivalent resources on male and female attractiveness. Annual salary is a direct way to evaluate economic status. Here, we combined images of male and female body shape with information on annual salary to elucidate the influence of economic status on the attractiveness ratings by opposite sex raters in American, Chinese and European populations. We found that ratings of attractiveness were around 4 times more sensitive to salary for females rating males, compared to males rating females. These results indicate that higher economic status can offset lower physical attractiveness in men much more easily than in women. Neither raters' BMI nor age influenced this effect for females rating male attractiveness. This difference explains many features of human mating behavior and may pose a barrier for male engagement in low-consumption lifestyles.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)220-225
Number of pages6
JournalEvolution and Human Behavior
Volume39
Issue number2
Early online date29 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018

Fingerprint

gender
socioeconomic status
resource
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Economics
economics
Asian Americans
parental investment
body shape
Attractiveness
Resources
Rating
Physical
mating behavior
human behavior
anthropometric measurements
Marriage
lifestyle
Fertility
Life Style

Keywords

  • Physical attractiveness
  • Economic status
  • Parental investment theory

Cite this

Different impacts of resources on opposite sex ratings of physical attractiveness by males and females. / Wang, Guanlin; Cao, Minxuan; Sauciuvenaite, Justina; Bissland, Ruth; Hacker, Megan; Hambly, Catherine; Vaanholt, Lobke M.; Niu, Chaoqun; Faries, Mark D.; Speakman, John R.

In: Evolution and Human Behavior, Vol. 39, No. 2, 03.2018, p. 220-225.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wang, Guanlin ; Cao, Minxuan ; Sauciuvenaite, Justina ; Bissland, Ruth ; Hacker, Megan ; Hambly, Catherine ; Vaanholt, Lobke M. ; Niu, Chaoqun ; Faries, Mark D. ; Speakman, John R. / Different impacts of resources on opposite sex ratings of physical attractiveness by males and females. In: Evolution and Human Behavior. 2018 ; Vol. 39, No. 2. pp. 220-225.
@article{d16bf0c5c3274632ba86933ceb7192ed,
title = "Different impacts of resources on opposite sex ratings of physical attractiveness by males and females",
abstract = "Parental investment hypotheses regarding mate selection suggest that human males should seek partners featured by youth and high fertility. However, females should be more sensitive to resources that can be invested on themselves and their offspring. Previous studies indicate that economic status is indeed important in male attractiveness. However, no previous study has quantified and compared the impact of equivalent resources on male and female attractiveness. Annual salary is a direct way to evaluate economic status. Here, we combined images of male and female body shape with information on annual salary to elucidate the influence of economic status on the attractiveness ratings by opposite sex raters in American, Chinese and European populations. We found that ratings of attractiveness were around 4 times more sensitive to salary for females rating males, compared to males rating females. These results indicate that higher economic status can offset lower physical attractiveness in men much more easily than in women. Neither raters' BMI nor age influenced this effect for females rating male attractiveness. This difference explains many features of human mating behavior and may pose a barrier for male engagement in low-consumption lifestyles.",
keywords = "Physical attractiveness, Economic status, Parental investment theory",
author = "Guanlin Wang and Minxuan Cao and Justina Sauciuvenaite and Ruth Bissland and Megan Hacker and Catherine Hambly and Vaanholt, {Lobke M.} and Chaoqun Niu and Faries, {Mark D.} and Speakman, {John R.}",
note = "This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC grant 91431102) and International Cooperation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (GJHZ1660). John R. Speakman was supported by the 1000 talents program of the Chinese government and a Wolfson merit award from the Royal Society. Guanlin Wang was awarded by the UCAS-UoA dual degree PhD training Program.",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.12.008",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "220--225",
journal = "Evolution and Human Behavior",
issn = "1090-5138",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Different impacts of resources on opposite sex ratings of physical attractiveness by males and females

AU - Wang, Guanlin

AU - Cao, Minxuan

AU - Sauciuvenaite, Justina

AU - Bissland, Ruth

AU - Hacker, Megan

AU - Hambly, Catherine

AU - Vaanholt, Lobke M.

AU - Niu, Chaoqun

AU - Faries, Mark D.

AU - Speakman, John R.

N1 - This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC grant 91431102) and International Cooperation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (GJHZ1660). John R. Speakman was supported by the 1000 talents program of the Chinese government and a Wolfson merit award from the Royal Society. Guanlin Wang was awarded by the UCAS-UoA dual degree PhD training Program.

PY - 2018/3

Y1 - 2018/3

N2 - Parental investment hypotheses regarding mate selection suggest that human males should seek partners featured by youth and high fertility. However, females should be more sensitive to resources that can be invested on themselves and their offspring. Previous studies indicate that economic status is indeed important in male attractiveness. However, no previous study has quantified and compared the impact of equivalent resources on male and female attractiveness. Annual salary is a direct way to evaluate economic status. Here, we combined images of male and female body shape with information on annual salary to elucidate the influence of economic status on the attractiveness ratings by opposite sex raters in American, Chinese and European populations. We found that ratings of attractiveness were around 4 times more sensitive to salary for females rating males, compared to males rating females. These results indicate that higher economic status can offset lower physical attractiveness in men much more easily than in women. Neither raters' BMI nor age influenced this effect for females rating male attractiveness. This difference explains many features of human mating behavior and may pose a barrier for male engagement in low-consumption lifestyles.

AB - Parental investment hypotheses regarding mate selection suggest that human males should seek partners featured by youth and high fertility. However, females should be more sensitive to resources that can be invested on themselves and their offspring. Previous studies indicate that economic status is indeed important in male attractiveness. However, no previous study has quantified and compared the impact of equivalent resources on male and female attractiveness. Annual salary is a direct way to evaluate economic status. Here, we combined images of male and female body shape with information on annual salary to elucidate the influence of economic status on the attractiveness ratings by opposite sex raters in American, Chinese and European populations. We found that ratings of attractiveness were around 4 times more sensitive to salary for females rating males, compared to males rating females. These results indicate that higher economic status can offset lower physical attractiveness in men much more easily than in women. Neither raters' BMI nor age influenced this effect for females rating male attractiveness. This difference explains many features of human mating behavior and may pose a barrier for male engagement in low-consumption lifestyles.

KW - Physical attractiveness

KW - Economic status

KW - Parental investment theory

U2 - 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.12.008

DO - 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.12.008

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 220

EP - 225

JO - Evolution and Human Behavior

JF - Evolution and Human Behavior

SN - 1090-5138

IS - 2

ER -