Different worlds of non-motoring

households without a car between compulsory immobility and lifestyle choice

Giulio Mattioli

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstract

Abstract

Households without a car are at the intersection of two contradicting concerns: first, car-free living has to be promoted in order to reduce the environmental impact of mobility. This is more likely to happen in urban areas, where transport alternatives are available. However, carless living is often the consequence of poverty and/or the cause of difficulties in accessing services, and is thus problematic from a social equity perspective. This association between the car and social inclusion is most frequent in suburban/rural areas, where car dependence is higher. Accordingly, the size and the nature of the group of households without a car is highly variable according to the spatial characteristics of the local area: in urban contexts, the group is large and complex, including also households for whom car-free living is a lifestyle choice. By contrast, where car dependence is high, households without a car are concentrated mostly among the poor and the elderly. Therefore, the internal structure of this social group can be considered as an indicator for the level of car dependence of the area. The paper explores this topic by means of a secondary analysis of the German national travel survey (MiD 2008). Using the tools of latent class analysis, it puts forward a typology of households, based on their stated reasons for not owning a car. The results show how the lack of a household car may correspond to very different situations, depending on the levels of overall mobility
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 2012
EventDortmund Conference 2012 on Spatial Planning Research 2012: “Mobilities and Immobilities" - School of Spatial Planning, University of Technology Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
Duration: 9 Feb 201210 Feb 2012

Conference

ConferenceDortmund Conference 2012 on Spatial Planning Research 2012: “Mobilities and Immobilities"
CountryGermany
CityDortmund
Period9/02/1210/02/12

Fingerprint

Railroad cars
secondary analysis
environmental impact
typology
urban area
rural area
equity
Group
travel
inclusion
poverty
cause
lack
Environmental impact

Keywords

  • sustainable transport
  • transport and social exclusion
  • social exclusion
  • car
  • car ownership
  • travel behaviour
  • mobility
  • segmentation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transportation

Cite this

Mattioli, G. (2012). Different worlds of non-motoring: households without a car between compulsory immobility and lifestyle choice. Abstract from Dortmund Conference 2012 on Spatial Planning Research 2012: “Mobilities and Immobilities", Dortmund, Germany.

Different worlds of non-motoring : households without a car between compulsory immobility and lifestyle choice. / Mattioli, Giulio.

2012. Abstract from Dortmund Conference 2012 on Spatial Planning Research 2012: “Mobilities and Immobilities", Dortmund, Germany.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstract

Mattioli, G 2012, 'Different worlds of non-motoring: households without a car between compulsory immobility and lifestyle choice' Dortmund Conference 2012 on Spatial Planning Research 2012: “Mobilities and Immobilities", Dortmund, Germany, 9/02/12 - 10/02/12, .
Mattioli G. Different worlds of non-motoring: households without a car between compulsory immobility and lifestyle choice. 2012. Abstract from Dortmund Conference 2012 on Spatial Planning Research 2012: “Mobilities and Immobilities", Dortmund, Germany.
Mattioli, Giulio. / Different worlds of non-motoring : households without a car between compulsory immobility and lifestyle choice. Abstract from Dortmund Conference 2012 on Spatial Planning Research 2012: “Mobilities and Immobilities", Dortmund, Germany.
@conference{65603630c64044c0b391c46d0933e3e0,
title = "Different worlds of non-motoring: households without a car between compulsory immobility and lifestyle choice",
abstract = "Households without a car are at the intersection of two contradicting concerns: first, car-free living has to be promoted in order to reduce the environmental impact of mobility. This is more likely to happen in urban areas, where transport alternatives are available. However, carless living is often the consequence of poverty and/or the cause of difficulties in accessing services, and is thus problematic from a social equity perspective. This association between the car and social inclusion is most frequent in suburban/rural areas, where car dependence is higher. Accordingly, the size and the nature of the group of households without a car is highly variable according to the spatial characteristics of the local area: in urban contexts, the group is large and complex, including also households for whom car-free living is a lifestyle choice. By contrast, where car dependence is high, households without a car are concentrated mostly among the poor and the elderly. Therefore, the internal structure of this social group can be considered as an indicator for the level of car dependence of the area. The paper explores this topic by means of a secondary analysis of the German national travel survey (MiD 2008). Using the tools of latent class analysis, it puts forward a typology of households, based on their stated reasons for not owning a car. The results show how the lack of a household car may correspond to very different situations, depending on the levels of overall mobility",
keywords = "sustainable transport , transport and social exclusion, social exclusion, car , car ownership, travel behaviour, mobility, segmentation",
author = "Giulio Mattioli",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
note = "Dortmund Conference 2012 on Spatial Planning Research 2012: “Mobilities and Immobilities{"} ; Conference date: 09-02-2012 Through 10-02-2012",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Different worlds of non-motoring

T2 - households without a car between compulsory immobility and lifestyle choice

AU - Mattioli, Giulio

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Households without a car are at the intersection of two contradicting concerns: first, car-free living has to be promoted in order to reduce the environmental impact of mobility. This is more likely to happen in urban areas, where transport alternatives are available. However, carless living is often the consequence of poverty and/or the cause of difficulties in accessing services, and is thus problematic from a social equity perspective. This association between the car and social inclusion is most frequent in suburban/rural areas, where car dependence is higher. Accordingly, the size and the nature of the group of households without a car is highly variable according to the spatial characteristics of the local area: in urban contexts, the group is large and complex, including also households for whom car-free living is a lifestyle choice. By contrast, where car dependence is high, households without a car are concentrated mostly among the poor and the elderly. Therefore, the internal structure of this social group can be considered as an indicator for the level of car dependence of the area. The paper explores this topic by means of a secondary analysis of the German national travel survey (MiD 2008). Using the tools of latent class analysis, it puts forward a typology of households, based on their stated reasons for not owning a car. The results show how the lack of a household car may correspond to very different situations, depending on the levels of overall mobility

AB - Households without a car are at the intersection of two contradicting concerns: first, car-free living has to be promoted in order to reduce the environmental impact of mobility. This is more likely to happen in urban areas, where transport alternatives are available. However, carless living is often the consequence of poverty and/or the cause of difficulties in accessing services, and is thus problematic from a social equity perspective. This association between the car and social inclusion is most frequent in suburban/rural areas, where car dependence is higher. Accordingly, the size and the nature of the group of households without a car is highly variable according to the spatial characteristics of the local area: in urban contexts, the group is large and complex, including also households for whom car-free living is a lifestyle choice. By contrast, where car dependence is high, households without a car are concentrated mostly among the poor and the elderly. Therefore, the internal structure of this social group can be considered as an indicator for the level of car dependence of the area. The paper explores this topic by means of a secondary analysis of the German national travel survey (MiD 2008). Using the tools of latent class analysis, it puts forward a typology of households, based on their stated reasons for not owning a car. The results show how the lack of a household car may correspond to very different situations, depending on the levels of overall mobility

KW - sustainable transport

KW - transport and social exclusion

KW - social exclusion

KW - car

KW - car ownership

KW - travel behaviour

KW - mobility

KW - segmentation

M3 - Abstract

ER -