Dimensions of publicness and organizational performance

A review of the evidence

Rhys Andrews* (Corresponding Author), George A. Boyne, Richard M. Walker

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    73 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Debates about the merits of publicness have dominated the public administration landscape since the foundation of the modern state. The extent of organizational publicness (ownership, funding, and control) has waxed and waned in developed countries: it rose following the postwar settlement and fell under the policies of New Right government and the popularity of the notions of New Public Management. We argue that publicness effects are likely to diminish in the face of organizational and contextual characteristics and that what matters for performance is management and organization. To this end, we examine the evidence base by undertaking a review of academic studies of publicness and organizational performance. The results suggest that publicness makes a difference to efficiency and equity, but the magnitude and direction of this effect varies with the characteristics of the empirical studies. Our findings clearly point toward the need for research that includes all dimensions of publicness, a variety of performance measures, and the moderating effects of management, organization, and external constraints.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)i301-i319
    Number of pages19
    JournalJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory
    Volume21
    Issue numberSuppl. 3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2011

    Fingerprint

    performance
    evidence
    organization
    studies (academic)
    New Public Management
    management
    public administration
    popularity
    equity
    funding
    efficiency
    Organizational performance
    Moderating effect
    Ownership
    Empirical study
    Performance measures
    Government
    Developed countries
    Equity
    New public management

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Public Administration
    • Marketing

    Cite this

    Dimensions of publicness and organizational performance : A review of the evidence. / Andrews, Rhys (Corresponding Author); Boyne, George A.; Walker, Richard M.

    In: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 21, No. Suppl. 3, 07.2011, p. i301-i319.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{f6077673cbc846a4b48d6220a6c0f39b,
    title = "Dimensions of publicness and organizational performance: A review of the evidence",
    abstract = "Debates about the merits of publicness have dominated the public administration landscape since the foundation of the modern state. The extent of organizational publicness (ownership, funding, and control) has waxed and waned in developed countries: it rose following the postwar settlement and fell under the policies of New Right government and the popularity of the notions of New Public Management. We argue that publicness effects are likely to diminish in the face of organizational and contextual characteristics and that what matters for performance is management and organization. To this end, we examine the evidence base by undertaking a review of academic studies of publicness and organizational performance. The results suggest that publicness makes a difference to efficiency and equity, but the magnitude and direction of this effect varies with the characteristics of the empirical studies. Our findings clearly point toward the need for research that includes all dimensions of publicness, a variety of performance measures, and the moderating effects of management, organization, and external constraints.",
    author = "Rhys Andrews and Boyne, {George A.} and Walker, {Richard M.}",
    note = "ESRC grant “How Public Management Matters” (RES 062-23-0039).",
    year = "2011",
    month = "7",
    doi = "10.1093/jopart/mur026",
    language = "English",
    volume = "21",
    pages = "i301--i319",
    journal = "Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory",
    issn = "1053-1858",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "Suppl. 3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Dimensions of publicness and organizational performance

    T2 - A review of the evidence

    AU - Andrews, Rhys

    AU - Boyne, George A.

    AU - Walker, Richard M.

    N1 - ESRC grant “How Public Management Matters” (RES 062-23-0039).

    PY - 2011/7

    Y1 - 2011/7

    N2 - Debates about the merits of publicness have dominated the public administration landscape since the foundation of the modern state. The extent of organizational publicness (ownership, funding, and control) has waxed and waned in developed countries: it rose following the postwar settlement and fell under the policies of New Right government and the popularity of the notions of New Public Management. We argue that publicness effects are likely to diminish in the face of organizational and contextual characteristics and that what matters for performance is management and organization. To this end, we examine the evidence base by undertaking a review of academic studies of publicness and organizational performance. The results suggest that publicness makes a difference to efficiency and equity, but the magnitude and direction of this effect varies with the characteristics of the empirical studies. Our findings clearly point toward the need for research that includes all dimensions of publicness, a variety of performance measures, and the moderating effects of management, organization, and external constraints.

    AB - Debates about the merits of publicness have dominated the public administration landscape since the foundation of the modern state. The extent of organizational publicness (ownership, funding, and control) has waxed and waned in developed countries: it rose following the postwar settlement and fell under the policies of New Right government and the popularity of the notions of New Public Management. We argue that publicness effects are likely to diminish in the face of organizational and contextual characteristics and that what matters for performance is management and organization. To this end, we examine the evidence base by undertaking a review of academic studies of publicness and organizational performance. The results suggest that publicness makes a difference to efficiency and equity, but the magnitude and direction of this effect varies with the characteristics of the empirical studies. Our findings clearly point toward the need for research that includes all dimensions of publicness, a variety of performance measures, and the moderating effects of management, organization, and external constraints.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960127678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1093/jopart/mur026

    DO - 10.1093/jopart/mur026

    M3 - Article

    VL - 21

    SP - i301-i319

    JO - Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

    JF - Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

    SN - 1053-1858

    IS - Suppl. 3

    ER -