Discussion: “Were the Ediacaran siliciclastics of South Australia coastal or deep marine?” by Retallack et al., Sedimentology, 59, 1208–1236

Richard H. T.  Callow; Martin D.  Brasier; Duncan McIlroy

doi:10.1111/j.1365-3091.2012.01363.x

Discussion: “Were the Ediacaran siliciclastics of South Australia coastal or deep marine?” by Retallack et al., Sedimentology, 59, 1208–1236

Richard H. T. Callow, Martin D. Brasier, Duncan McIlroy

Geology and Geophysics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	624-627
Number of pages	4
Journal	Sedimentology
Volume	60
Issue number	2
Early online date	1 Oct 2012
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2012.01363.x
Publication status	Published - Feb 2013

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1365-3091.2012.01363.xLicence: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{91a49c2ed24f41598dacfdb56a7d0aeb,

title = "Discussion: “Were the Ediacaran siliciclastics of South Australia coastal or deep marine?” by Retallack et al., Sedimentology, 59, 1208–1236",

author = "Callow, {Richard H. T.} and Brasier, {Martin D.} and Duncan McIlroy",

year = "2013",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1111/j.1365-3091.2012.01363.x",

language = "English",

volume = "60",

pages = "624--627",

journal = "Sedimentology",

issn = "0037-0746",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discussion: “Were the Ediacaran siliciclastics of South Australia coastal or deep marine?” by Retallack et al., Sedimentology, 59, 1208–1236

AU - Callow, Richard H. T.

AU - Brasier, Martin D.

AU - McIlroy, Duncan

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2012.01363.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2012.01363.x

M3 - Article

SN - 0037-0746

VL - 60

SP - 624

EP - 627

JO - Sedimentology

JF - Sedimentology

IS - 2

ER -