Discussion: “Were the Ediacaran siliciclastics of South Australia coastal or deep marine?” by Retallack et al., Sedimentology, 59, 1208–1236

Richard H. T. Callow, Martin D. Brasier, Duncan McIlroy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)624-627
Number of pages4
JournalSedimentology
Volume60
Issue number2
Early online date1 Oct 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2013

Cite this

Discussion: “Were the Ediacaran siliciclastics of South Australia coastal or deep marine?” by Retallack et al., Sedimentology, 59, 1208–1236. / Callow, Richard H. T. ; Brasier, Martin D. ; McIlroy, Duncan.

In: Sedimentology, Vol. 60, No. 2, 02.2013, p. 624-627.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Callow, Richard H. T. ; Brasier, Martin D. ; McIlroy, Duncan. / Discussion: “Were the Ediacaran siliciclastics of South Australia coastal or deep marine?” by Retallack et al., Sedimentology, 59, 1208–1236. In: Sedimentology. 2013 ; Vol. 60, No. 2. pp. 624-627.
@article{91a49c2ed24f41598dacfdb56a7d0aeb,
title = "Discussion: “Were the Ediacaran siliciclastics of South Australia coastal or deep marine?” by Retallack et al., Sedimentology, 59, 1208–1236",
author = "Callow, {Richard H. T.} and Brasier, {Martin D.} and Duncan McIlroy",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-3091.2012.01363.x",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "624--627",
journal = "Sedimentology",
issn = "0037-0746",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discussion: “Were the Ediacaran siliciclastics of South Australia coastal or deep marine?” by Retallack et al., Sedimentology, 59, 1208–1236

AU - Callow, Richard H. T.

AU - Brasier, Martin D.

AU - McIlroy, Duncan

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2012.01363.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2012.01363.x

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 624

EP - 627

JO - Sedimentology

JF - Sedimentology

SN - 0037-0746

IS - 2

ER -