Do doctors have a duty to take part in pragmatic randomised trials?

Marion K. Campbell, Charles Weijer, Cory E. Goldstein, Sarah J. L. Edwards

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

6 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

For society to benefit from new clinical knowledge the expectation should be to participate in research, writes Marion K Campbell; Charles Weijer and colleagues agree but argue that the fundamental need for consent makes this an imperfect duty.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberj2817
Pages (from-to)1-3
Number of pages3
JournalBMJ
Volume357
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

Pragmatic Clinical Trials
Research

Cite this

Campbell, M. K., Weijer, C., Goldstein, C. E., & Edwards, S. J. L. (2017). Do doctors have a duty to take part in pragmatic randomised trials? BMJ, 357, 1-3. [j2817]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j2817

Do doctors have a duty to take part in pragmatic randomised trials? / Campbell, Marion K.; Weijer, Charles; Goldstein, Cory E.; Edwards, Sarah J. L.

In: BMJ, Vol. 357, j2817, 14.06.2017, p. 1-3.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Campbell, MK, Weijer, C, Goldstein, CE & Edwards, SJL 2017, 'Do doctors have a duty to take part in pragmatic randomised trials?' BMJ, vol. 357, j2817, pp. 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j2817
Campbell, Marion K. ; Weijer, Charles ; Goldstein, Cory E. ; Edwards, Sarah J. L. / Do doctors have a duty to take part in pragmatic randomised trials?. In: BMJ. 2017 ; Vol. 357. pp. 1-3.
@article{28619f68d27f4076985835310af6eadd,
title = "Do doctors have a duty to take part in pragmatic randomised trials?",
abstract = "For society to benefit from new clinical knowledge the expectation should be to participate in research, writes Marion K Campbell; Charles Weijer and colleagues agree but argue that the fundamental need for consent makes this an imperfect duty.",
author = "Campbell, {Marion K.} and Charles Weijer and Goldstein, {Cory E.} and Edwards, {Sarah J. L.}",
note = "Competing interests: All authors have read and understood BMJ policy on declaration of interests and declare the following: MKC designs and conducts randomised controlled trials; she has received grant funding for publicly funded trials; and has written on the design, methods, and reporting of trials. Provenance and peer review: Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1136/bmj.j2817",
language = "English",
volume = "357",
pages = "1--3",
journal = "BMJ",
issn = "0959-8146",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do doctors have a duty to take part in pragmatic randomised trials?

AU - Campbell, Marion K.

AU - Weijer, Charles

AU - Goldstein, Cory E.

AU - Edwards, Sarah J. L.

N1 - Competing interests: All authors have read and understood BMJ policy on declaration of interests and declare the following: MKC designs and conducts randomised controlled trials; she has received grant funding for publicly funded trials; and has written on the design, methods, and reporting of trials. Provenance and peer review: Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

PY - 2017/6/14

Y1 - 2017/6/14

N2 - For society to benefit from new clinical knowledge the expectation should be to participate in research, writes Marion K Campbell; Charles Weijer and colleagues agree but argue that the fundamental need for consent makes this an imperfect duty.

AB - For society to benefit from new clinical knowledge the expectation should be to participate in research, writes Marion K Campbell; Charles Weijer and colleagues agree but argue that the fundamental need for consent makes this an imperfect duty.

U2 - 10.1136/bmj.j2817

DO - 10.1136/bmj.j2817

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 357

SP - 1

EP - 3

JO - BMJ

JF - BMJ

SN - 0959-8146

M1 - j2817

ER -