Does retrograde balloon dilation compromise outcome of secondary open pyeloplasty: 17 Years' experience at a single center

K. S. Janjua, G. Nabi*, J. N'Dow, J. K. Hussey, S. McClinton

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. To determine whether the outcome of secondary open pyeloplasty is compromised by previous retrograde balloon dilation. Methods. Patients undergoing secondary open pyeloplasty after retrograde balloon dilation (n = 25) were compared with a similar group undergoing primary open pyeloplasty (n = 25) at the same institution. Patients were assessed by renography before and after surgery, and postoperative success was determined by the complete absence of pain. Results. In the primary pyeloplasty group, the success rate was 96%, with a mean follow-up of 33 months (range 17 to 53). In the secondary pyeloplasty group, the success rate was 88%, with a mean follow-up of 20 months (range 9 to 32). No statistically significant difference was found in the success rates between the two groups (P = 0.6). Conclusions. Treatment failures after retrograde balloon dilation can be salvaged by secondary pyeloplasty with no detriment to the chance of long-term success compared with primary pyeloplasty.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1172-1175
Number of pages4
JournalUrology
Volume66
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Does retrograde balloon dilation compromise outcome of secondary open pyeloplasty: 17 Years' experience at a single center'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this