Early treatment for Class II malocclusion and perceived improvements in facial profile

Kevin O'Brien, Tatiana MacFarlane, Jean Wright, Frances Conboy, Priscilla Appelbe, David Birnie, Stephen Chadwick, Ivan Connolly, Mark Hammond, Nigel Harradine, David Lewis, Simon Littlewood, Catherine McDade, Laura Mitchell, Alison Murray, Julian O'Neill, Jonathan Sandler, Micheal Read, Stephen Robinson, Iain ShawElizabeth Turbill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction
The aims of this study were to assess whether early Twin-block appliance treatment improves the attractiveness of Class II profiles and to determine the orofacial features of a profile that most influence the perception of attractiveness.

Methods
Silhouetted profiles of 20 treated patients and 20 untreated controls randomly selected from 174 subjects (ages, 8-10 years) of a randomized, controlled trial into the effectiveness of early Class II treatment were assessed by 30 children (ages, 10-11 years) and 24 teaching staff using a 5-point Likert scale. Independent samples t tests were used to compare attractiveness ratings between the treated and untreated groups. Linear regression was used to determine the features defining attractiveness.

Results
Early orthodontic treatment resulted in improved perceptions of facial profile attractiveness. Profiles were likely to be rated as attractive if the overjet was smaller (P = 0.001) and no teeth showed (P <0.05).

Conclusions
Profile silhouettes of children who had received early orthodontic treatment for Class II malocclusion were perceived to be more attractive by peers than those of children who did not receive treatment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)580-585
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Volume135
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2009

Fingerprint

Malocclusion
Orthodontics
Therapeutics
Linear Models
Tooth
Teaching
Randomized Controlled Trials

Keywords

  • child
  • dentition, mixed
  • esthetics, dental
  • face
  • female
  • humans
  • linear models
  • male
  • malocclusion, angle class II
  • orthodontic appliances, functional
  • orthodontics, interceptive
  • peer group
  • self concept
  • treatment outcome

Cite this

Early treatment for Class II malocclusion and perceived improvements in facial profile. / O'Brien, Kevin; MacFarlane, Tatiana; Wright, Jean; Conboy, Frances; Appelbe, Priscilla; Birnie, David; Chadwick, Stephen; Connolly, Ivan; Hammond, Mark; Harradine, Nigel; Lewis, David; Littlewood, Simon; McDade, Catherine; Mitchell, Laura; Murray, Alison; O'Neill, Julian; Sandler, Jonathan; Read, Micheal; Robinson, Stephen; Shaw, Iain; Turbill, Elizabeth.

In: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Vol. 135, No. 5, 05.2009, p. 580-585.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

O'Brien, K, MacFarlane, T, Wright, J, Conboy, F, Appelbe, P, Birnie, D, Chadwick, S, Connolly, I, Hammond, M, Harradine, N, Lewis, D, Littlewood, S, McDade, C, Mitchell, L, Murray, A, O'Neill, J, Sandler, J, Read, M, Robinson, S, Shaw, I & Turbill, E 2009, 'Early treatment for Class II malocclusion and perceived improvements in facial profile', American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 135, no. 5, pp. 580-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.020
O'Brien, Kevin ; MacFarlane, Tatiana ; Wright, Jean ; Conboy, Frances ; Appelbe, Priscilla ; Birnie, David ; Chadwick, Stephen ; Connolly, Ivan ; Hammond, Mark ; Harradine, Nigel ; Lewis, David ; Littlewood, Simon ; McDade, Catherine ; Mitchell, Laura ; Murray, Alison ; O'Neill, Julian ; Sandler, Jonathan ; Read, Micheal ; Robinson, Stephen ; Shaw, Iain ; Turbill, Elizabeth. / Early treatment for Class II malocclusion and perceived improvements in facial profile. In: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2009 ; Vol. 135, No. 5. pp. 580-585.
@article{efb5984f893049ce842244f68adfe35f,
title = "Early treatment for Class II malocclusion and perceived improvements in facial profile",
abstract = "IntroductionThe aims of this study were to assess whether early Twin-block appliance treatment improves the attractiveness of Class II profiles and to determine the orofacial features of a profile that most influence the perception of attractiveness.MethodsSilhouetted profiles of 20 treated patients and 20 untreated controls randomly selected from 174 subjects (ages, 8-10 years) of a randomized, controlled trial into the effectiveness of early Class II treatment were assessed by 30 children (ages, 10-11 years) and 24 teaching staff using a 5-point Likert scale. Independent samples t tests were used to compare attractiveness ratings between the treated and untreated groups. Linear regression was used to determine the features defining attractiveness.ResultsEarly orthodontic treatment resulted in improved perceptions of facial profile attractiveness. Profiles were likely to be rated as attractive if the overjet was smaller (P = 0.001) and no teeth showed (P <0.05).ConclusionsProfile silhouettes of children who had received early orthodontic treatment for Class II malocclusion were perceived to be more attractive by peers than those of children who did not receive treatment.",
keywords = "child, dentition, mixed, esthetics, dental, face, female, humans, linear models, male, malocclusion, angle class II, orthodontic appliances, functional, orthodontics, interceptive, peer group, self concept, treatment outcome",
author = "Kevin O'Brien and Tatiana MacFarlane and Jean Wright and Frances Conboy and Priscilla Appelbe and David Birnie and Stephen Chadwick and Ivan Connolly and Mark Hammond and Nigel Harradine and David Lewis and Simon Littlewood and Catherine McDade and Laura Mitchell and Alison Murray and Julian O'Neill and Jonathan Sandler and Micheal Read and Stephen Robinson and Iain Shaw and Elizabeth Turbill",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.020",
language = "English",
volume = "135",
pages = "580--585",
journal = "American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics",
issn = "0889-5406",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Early treatment for Class II malocclusion and perceived improvements in facial profile

AU - O'Brien, Kevin

AU - MacFarlane, Tatiana

AU - Wright, Jean

AU - Conboy, Frances

AU - Appelbe, Priscilla

AU - Birnie, David

AU - Chadwick, Stephen

AU - Connolly, Ivan

AU - Hammond, Mark

AU - Harradine, Nigel

AU - Lewis, David

AU - Littlewood, Simon

AU - McDade, Catherine

AU - Mitchell, Laura

AU - Murray, Alison

AU - O'Neill, Julian

AU - Sandler, Jonathan

AU - Read, Micheal

AU - Robinson, Stephen

AU - Shaw, Iain

AU - Turbill, Elizabeth

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - IntroductionThe aims of this study were to assess whether early Twin-block appliance treatment improves the attractiveness of Class II profiles and to determine the orofacial features of a profile that most influence the perception of attractiveness.MethodsSilhouetted profiles of 20 treated patients and 20 untreated controls randomly selected from 174 subjects (ages, 8-10 years) of a randomized, controlled trial into the effectiveness of early Class II treatment were assessed by 30 children (ages, 10-11 years) and 24 teaching staff using a 5-point Likert scale. Independent samples t tests were used to compare attractiveness ratings between the treated and untreated groups. Linear regression was used to determine the features defining attractiveness.ResultsEarly orthodontic treatment resulted in improved perceptions of facial profile attractiveness. Profiles were likely to be rated as attractive if the overjet was smaller (P = 0.001) and no teeth showed (P <0.05).ConclusionsProfile silhouettes of children who had received early orthodontic treatment for Class II malocclusion were perceived to be more attractive by peers than those of children who did not receive treatment.

AB - IntroductionThe aims of this study were to assess whether early Twin-block appliance treatment improves the attractiveness of Class II profiles and to determine the orofacial features of a profile that most influence the perception of attractiveness.MethodsSilhouetted profiles of 20 treated patients and 20 untreated controls randomly selected from 174 subjects (ages, 8-10 years) of a randomized, controlled trial into the effectiveness of early Class II treatment were assessed by 30 children (ages, 10-11 years) and 24 teaching staff using a 5-point Likert scale. Independent samples t tests were used to compare attractiveness ratings between the treated and untreated groups. Linear regression was used to determine the features defining attractiveness.ResultsEarly orthodontic treatment resulted in improved perceptions of facial profile attractiveness. Profiles were likely to be rated as attractive if the overjet was smaller (P = 0.001) and no teeth showed (P <0.05).ConclusionsProfile silhouettes of children who had received early orthodontic treatment for Class II malocclusion were perceived to be more attractive by peers than those of children who did not receive treatment.

KW - child

KW - dentition, mixed

KW - esthetics, dental

KW - face

KW - female

KW - humans

KW - linear models

KW - male

KW - malocclusion, angle class II

KW - orthodontic appliances, functional

KW - orthodontics, interceptive

KW - peer group

KW - self concept

KW - treatment outcome

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.020

DO - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.020

M3 - Article

C2 - 19409340

VL - 135

SP - 580

EP - 585

JO - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

JF - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

SN - 0889-5406

IS - 5

ER -