Abstract
Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature.
Objectives: To assess the effects of biomaterial-based combination (BMC) strategies for the treatment of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), the effects of individual biomaterials in the context of BMC strategies, and the factors influencing their efficacy. To assess the effects of different preclinical testing paradigms in BMC strategies.
Methods: We performed a systematic literature search of Embase, Web of Science and PubMed. All controlled preclinical studies describing an in vivo or in vitro model of SCI that tested a biomaterial in combination with at least one other regenerative strategy (cells, drugs, or both) were included. Two review authors conducted the study selection independently, extracted study characteristics independently and assessed study quality using a modified CAMARADES checklist. Effect size measures were combined using random-effects models and heterogeneity was explored using meta-regression with tau2, I2 and R2 statistics. We tested for small-study effects using funnel plot–based methods.
Results: 134 publications were included, testing over 100 different BMC strategies. Overall, treatment with BMC therapies improved locomotor recovery by 25.3% (95% CI, 20.3-30.3; n=102) and in vivo axonal regeneration by 1.6SD (95% CI 1.2-2SD; n=117) in comparison with injury only controls.
Conclusion: BMC strategies improve locomotor outcomes after experimental SCI. Our comprehensive study highlights gaps in current knowledge and provides a foundation for the design of future experiments.
Objectives: To assess the effects of biomaterial-based combination (BMC) strategies for the treatment of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), the effects of individual biomaterials in the context of BMC strategies, and the factors influencing their efficacy. To assess the effects of different preclinical testing paradigms in BMC strategies.
Methods: We performed a systematic literature search of Embase, Web of Science and PubMed. All controlled preclinical studies describing an in vivo or in vitro model of SCI that tested a biomaterial in combination with at least one other regenerative strategy (cells, drugs, or both) were included. Two review authors conducted the study selection independently, extracted study characteristics independently and assessed study quality using a modified CAMARADES checklist. Effect size measures were combined using random-effects models and heterogeneity was explored using meta-regression with tau2, I2 and R2 statistics. We tested for small-study effects using funnel plot–based methods.
Results: 134 publications were included, testing over 100 different BMC strategies. Overall, treatment with BMC therapies improved locomotor recovery by 25.3% (95% CI, 20.3-30.3; n=102) and in vivo axonal regeneration by 1.6SD (95% CI 1.2-2SD; n=117) in comparison with injury only controls.
Conclusion: BMC strategies improve locomotor outcomes after experimental SCI. Our comprehensive study highlights gaps in current knowledge and provides a foundation for the design of future experiments.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Spinal Cord |
Early online date | 23 May 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 23 May 2022 |
Keywords
- FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY
- GENE-THERAPY
- INJURY
- REGENERATION
- DELIVERY
- DESIGN
- CELLS
- MODEL
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of biomaterial-based combination strategies for spinal cord repair – a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Data from: Effectiveness of biomaterial-based combination strategies for spinal cord repair – a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature
Guijarro Belmar, A. (Creator), Tanriver-Ayder, E. (Creator), Sena, E. (Creator), Macleod, M. R. (Creator), Currie, G. (Creator), McCann, S. K. (Creator) & Bhattacharya, S. (Other), University of Aberdeen, 19 Feb 2022
Dataset