Empire and Risk

Edwardian Financiers, Australia,and Canada, c. 1899-1914

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although British investors are viewed as showing no marked imperial piety,investments in the dominions (the British Empire‘s self-governing colonies) occupied an exceptional place in the capital market, enjoying low interest rates.
I trace Edwardian London financiers and investors‘ expectations concerning the effects of imperial connections on Canadian and Australian investment risk. Reconstructing the assumptions linking investment and empire clarifies dominion¿exceptionalism. The Empire reassured investors in two ways.
First, institutional factors (legal integration through the Privy Council‘s Judicial Committee and British defensive guarantees) reassured some investors, although these operations depended on colonial consent. Second, the Empire promoted information flows, social networking, and shared cultural assumptions that made the dominions safer havens for British capital. Colonial borrowers played on these factors in dealing with the capital market. Thus, membership in the Empire did not replace the use of more familiar economic and political tools in calculating
risks, but it did inform judgment of those risks.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalBusiness and Economic History Online
Volume7
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Canada
Investors
Capital markets
Social networking
Guarantee
Factors
Economics
Consent
Investment risk
Information flow
Interest rates
Institutional factors
Safe haven

Cite this

Empire and Risk : Edwardian Financiers, Australia,and Canada, c. 1899-1914. / Dilley, Andrew.

In: Business and Economic History Online, Vol. 7, 2009, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{84e406a8e97242118ff3e1291cab273c,
title = "Empire and Risk: Edwardian Financiers, Australia,and Canada, c. 1899-1914",
abstract = "Although British investors are viewed as showing no marked imperial piety,investments in the dominions (the British Empire‘s self-governing colonies) occupied an exceptional place in the capital market, enjoying low interest rates. I trace Edwardian London financiers and investors‘ expectations concerning the effects of imperial connections on Canadian and Australian investment risk. Reconstructing the assumptions linking investment and empire clarifies dominion¿exceptionalism. The Empire reassured investors in two ways. First, institutional factors (legal integration through the Privy Council‘s Judicial Committee and British defensive guarantees) reassured some investors, although these operations depended on colonial consent. Second, the Empire promoted information flows, social networking, and shared cultural assumptions that made the dominions safer havens for British capital. Colonial borrowers played on these factors in dealing with the capital market. Thus, membership in the Empire did not replace the use of more familiar economic and political tools in calculating risks, but it did inform judgment of those risks.",
author = "Andrew Dilley",
note = "Online conference proceedings published as a journal",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Business and Economic History Online",
issn = "1941-7349",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empire and Risk

T2 - Edwardian Financiers, Australia,and Canada, c. 1899-1914

AU - Dilley, Andrew

N1 - Online conference proceedings published as a journal

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Although British investors are viewed as showing no marked imperial piety,investments in the dominions (the British Empire‘s self-governing colonies) occupied an exceptional place in the capital market, enjoying low interest rates. I trace Edwardian London financiers and investors‘ expectations concerning the effects of imperial connections on Canadian and Australian investment risk. Reconstructing the assumptions linking investment and empire clarifies dominion¿exceptionalism. The Empire reassured investors in two ways. First, institutional factors (legal integration through the Privy Council‘s Judicial Committee and British defensive guarantees) reassured some investors, although these operations depended on colonial consent. Second, the Empire promoted information flows, social networking, and shared cultural assumptions that made the dominions safer havens for British capital. Colonial borrowers played on these factors in dealing with the capital market. Thus, membership in the Empire did not replace the use of more familiar economic and political tools in calculating risks, but it did inform judgment of those risks.

AB - Although British investors are viewed as showing no marked imperial piety,investments in the dominions (the British Empire‘s self-governing colonies) occupied an exceptional place in the capital market, enjoying low interest rates. I trace Edwardian London financiers and investors‘ expectations concerning the effects of imperial connections on Canadian and Australian investment risk. Reconstructing the assumptions linking investment and empire clarifies dominion¿exceptionalism. The Empire reassured investors in two ways. First, institutional factors (legal integration through the Privy Council‘s Judicial Committee and British defensive guarantees) reassured some investors, although these operations depended on colonial consent. Second, the Empire promoted information flows, social networking, and shared cultural assumptions that made the dominions safer havens for British capital. Colonial borrowers played on these factors in dealing with the capital market. Thus, membership in the Empire did not replace the use of more familiar economic and political tools in calculating risks, but it did inform judgment of those risks.

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Business and Economic History Online

JF - Business and Economic History Online

SN - 1941-7349

ER -