EU renewable energy support policy: faith or facts?

Staffan Jacobsson (Corresponding Author), Anna Bergek, Dominique Finon, Volkmar Lauber, Catherine Mitchell, David Toke, Aviel Verbruggen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

132 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The recent EU Commission proposal for promoting the supply of power from renewable energy sources was originally based on a pan-European, harmonised tradable green certificate (TGC) scheme. We suggest, on the basis of a multi-disciplinary analysis, that a pan-EU TGC system is not the way forward for Europe. It is vital that the Commission (and the majority of Member States) avoids implementation of such policy designs put forward by a coalition of vested interests. They should instead look at, and act upon, the available evidence from those countries that have experimented with TGCs (e.g. Flanders, UK and Sweden) and design policies that stand a better chance of meeting the criteria of effectiveness, efficiency and equity. In particular, the policies must enable EU to meet the immense innovation/industrialisation challenge by inducing the development of a capital goods industry that can, eventually, diffuse a broad range of technologies that use renewable energy sources. Only then we can acquire an ability to implement an industrial revolution in the energy system in a way that broadly meets the criteria of effectiveness and dynamic efficiency.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2143-2146
Number of pages4
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume37
Issue number6
Early online date31 Mar 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

energy
Innovation
industrialization
equity
innovation
Industry
industry
policy
renewable energy source
goods
Europe
analysis

Keywords

  • EU Policy
  • Tradable green certificates
  • evidence

Cite this

Jacobsson, S., Bergek, A., Finon, D., Lauber, V., Mitchell, C., Toke, D., & Verbruggen, A. (2009). EU renewable energy support policy: faith or facts? Energy Policy, 37(6), 2143-2146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.043

EU renewable energy support policy : faith or facts? / Jacobsson, Staffan (Corresponding Author); Bergek, Anna ; Finon, Dominique; Lauber, Volkmar; Mitchell, Catherine ; Toke, David; Verbruggen, Aviel.

In: Energy Policy, Vol. 37, No. 6, 06.2009, p. 2143-2146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jacobsson, S, Bergek, A, Finon, D, Lauber, V, Mitchell, C, Toke, D & Verbruggen, A 2009, 'EU renewable energy support policy: faith or facts?', Energy Policy, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 2143-2146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.043
Jacobsson S, Bergek A, Finon D, Lauber V, Mitchell C, Toke D et al. EU renewable energy support policy: faith or facts? Energy Policy. 2009 Jun;37(6):2143-2146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.043
Jacobsson, Staffan ; Bergek, Anna ; Finon, Dominique ; Lauber, Volkmar ; Mitchell, Catherine ; Toke, David ; Verbruggen, Aviel. / EU renewable energy support policy : faith or facts?. In: Energy Policy. 2009 ; Vol. 37, No. 6. pp. 2143-2146.
@article{c18da250c9844477921c489dc4c2d0b1,
title = "EU renewable energy support policy: faith or facts?",
abstract = "The recent EU Commission proposal for promoting the supply of power from renewable energy sources was originally based on a pan-European, harmonised tradable green certificate (TGC) scheme. We suggest, on the basis of a multi-disciplinary analysis, that a pan-EU TGC system is not the way forward for Europe. It is vital that the Commission (and the majority of Member States) avoids implementation of such policy designs put forward by a coalition of vested interests. They should instead look at, and act upon, the available evidence from those countries that have experimented with TGCs (e.g. Flanders, UK and Sweden) and design policies that stand a better chance of meeting the criteria of effectiveness, efficiency and equity. In particular, the policies must enable EU to meet the immense innovation/industrialisation challenge by inducing the development of a capital goods industry that can, eventually, diffuse a broad range of technologies that use renewable energy sources. Only then we can acquire an ability to implement an industrial revolution in the energy system in a way that broadly meets the criteria of effectiveness and dynamic efficiency.",
keywords = "EU Policy, Tradable green certificates, evidence",
author = "Staffan Jacobsson and Anna Bergek and Dominique Finon and Volkmar Lauber and Catherine Mitchell and David Toke and Aviel Verbruggen",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.043",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "2143--2146",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - EU renewable energy support policy

T2 - faith or facts?

AU - Jacobsson, Staffan

AU - Bergek, Anna

AU - Finon, Dominique

AU - Lauber, Volkmar

AU - Mitchell, Catherine

AU - Toke, David

AU - Verbruggen, Aviel

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - The recent EU Commission proposal for promoting the supply of power from renewable energy sources was originally based on a pan-European, harmonised tradable green certificate (TGC) scheme. We suggest, on the basis of a multi-disciplinary analysis, that a pan-EU TGC system is not the way forward for Europe. It is vital that the Commission (and the majority of Member States) avoids implementation of such policy designs put forward by a coalition of vested interests. They should instead look at, and act upon, the available evidence from those countries that have experimented with TGCs (e.g. Flanders, UK and Sweden) and design policies that stand a better chance of meeting the criteria of effectiveness, efficiency and equity. In particular, the policies must enable EU to meet the immense innovation/industrialisation challenge by inducing the development of a capital goods industry that can, eventually, diffuse a broad range of technologies that use renewable energy sources. Only then we can acquire an ability to implement an industrial revolution in the energy system in a way that broadly meets the criteria of effectiveness and dynamic efficiency.

AB - The recent EU Commission proposal for promoting the supply of power from renewable energy sources was originally based on a pan-European, harmonised tradable green certificate (TGC) scheme. We suggest, on the basis of a multi-disciplinary analysis, that a pan-EU TGC system is not the way forward for Europe. It is vital that the Commission (and the majority of Member States) avoids implementation of such policy designs put forward by a coalition of vested interests. They should instead look at, and act upon, the available evidence from those countries that have experimented with TGCs (e.g. Flanders, UK and Sweden) and design policies that stand a better chance of meeting the criteria of effectiveness, efficiency and equity. In particular, the policies must enable EU to meet the immense innovation/industrialisation challenge by inducing the development of a capital goods industry that can, eventually, diffuse a broad range of technologies that use renewable energy sources. Only then we can acquire an ability to implement an industrial revolution in the energy system in a way that broadly meets the criteria of effectiveness and dynamic efficiency.

KW - EU Policy

KW - Tradable green certificates

KW - evidence

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.043

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.043

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 2143

EP - 2146

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

IS - 6

ER -