Feedback and Incentive Effects on the Decrease of Interbeat Interval

Derek W Johnston, Jane Lethem

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Johnston and Lethem (1981) have hypothesized that when subjects attempt to decrease their interbeat interval (i.e., increase their heart rate) maximally, then interbeat interval feedback has a purely motivational role, but when they attempt to decrease their interbeat interval by a precise amount, such feedback has a primarily informational role. This was tested by comparing the performance of 16 subjects on both types of task. It was predicted that additional monetary incentives would reduce the difference between feedback and no-feedback conditions when subjects were attempting to reduce interbeat interval maximally but not when attempting to reduce it by a specific amount. This prediction was not supported. Incentive was found to aid performance on the maximal interbeat interval decrease task, but this was independent of the effects of feedback. Only feedback effects were detected on the specific interbeat interval decrease task.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)255-263
Number of pages9
JournalBiofeedback and Self-regulation
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1983

Fingerprint

Motivation
heart rate
prediction
Heart Rate

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Biofeedback, Psychology
  • Feedback
  • Female
  • Heart Rate
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Motivation

Cite this

Feedback and Incentive Effects on the Decrease of Interbeat Interval. / Johnston, Derek W; Lethem, Jane.

In: Biofeedback and Self-regulation, Vol. 8, No. 2, 06.1983, p. 255-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ec6b013a9c984e4f8213e663dc24dfa2,
title = "Feedback and Incentive Effects on the Decrease of Interbeat Interval",
abstract = "Johnston and Lethem (1981) have hypothesized that when subjects attempt to decrease their interbeat interval (i.e., increase their heart rate) maximally, then interbeat interval feedback has a purely motivational role, but when they attempt to decrease their interbeat interval by a precise amount, such feedback has a primarily informational role. This was tested by comparing the performance of 16 subjects on both types of task. It was predicted that additional monetary incentives would reduce the difference between feedback and no-feedback conditions when subjects were attempting to reduce interbeat interval maximally but not when attempting to reduce it by a specific amount. This prediction was not supported. Incentive was found to aid performance on the maximal interbeat interval decrease task, but this was independent of the effects of feedback. Only feedback effects were detected on the specific interbeat interval decrease task.",
keywords = "Adult, Biofeedback, Psychology, Feedback, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Motivation",
author = "Johnston, {Derek W} and Jane Lethem",
year = "1983",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/BF00998855",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "255--263",
journal = "Biofeedback and Self-regulation",
issn = "0363-3586",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feedback and Incentive Effects on the Decrease of Interbeat Interval

AU - Johnston, Derek W

AU - Lethem, Jane

PY - 1983/6

Y1 - 1983/6

N2 - Johnston and Lethem (1981) have hypothesized that when subjects attempt to decrease their interbeat interval (i.e., increase their heart rate) maximally, then interbeat interval feedback has a purely motivational role, but when they attempt to decrease their interbeat interval by a precise amount, such feedback has a primarily informational role. This was tested by comparing the performance of 16 subjects on both types of task. It was predicted that additional monetary incentives would reduce the difference between feedback and no-feedback conditions when subjects were attempting to reduce interbeat interval maximally but not when attempting to reduce it by a specific amount. This prediction was not supported. Incentive was found to aid performance on the maximal interbeat interval decrease task, but this was independent of the effects of feedback. Only feedback effects were detected on the specific interbeat interval decrease task.

AB - Johnston and Lethem (1981) have hypothesized that when subjects attempt to decrease their interbeat interval (i.e., increase their heart rate) maximally, then interbeat interval feedback has a purely motivational role, but when they attempt to decrease their interbeat interval by a precise amount, such feedback has a primarily informational role. This was tested by comparing the performance of 16 subjects on both types of task. It was predicted that additional monetary incentives would reduce the difference between feedback and no-feedback conditions when subjects were attempting to reduce interbeat interval maximally but not when attempting to reduce it by a specific amount. This prediction was not supported. Incentive was found to aid performance on the maximal interbeat interval decrease task, but this was independent of the effects of feedback. Only feedback effects were detected on the specific interbeat interval decrease task.

KW - Adult

KW - Biofeedback, Psychology

KW - Feedback

KW - Female

KW - Heart Rate

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Motivation

U2 - 10.1007/BF00998855

DO - 10.1007/BF00998855

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 255

EP - 263

JO - Biofeedback and Self-regulation

JF - Biofeedback and Self-regulation

SN - 0363-3586

IS - 2

ER -