Feminist research management in higher education in Britain

possibilities and practices

Natasha S Mauthner, Rosalind Edwards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article aims to explore the possibilities and ambivalent practices of feminist management in the context of research management in higher education in Britain. Drawing on a reflexive and critical analysis of our experiences of contract research and research management over the past 15 years, we discuss the challenges of putting feminist management principles into practice in team-based and collaborative research projects. By rendering academic cultures increasingly competitive, individualist and managerial, we argue, new managerialist reforms in higher education over the past two decades have intensified those very aspects of academic life that feminists have long struggled with. In particular, in creating the new subject position of research manager, with concomitant institutional expectations and obligations, new managerialism has exacerbated tensions between our identities as feminists, scholars and managers and between collective, individual and institutional needs and aspirations. We illustrate these tensions through a discussion of four related aspects of team research which, we suggest, undermine attempts at implementing the feminist ideals of intellectual equity and political equality: divisions of labour in research teams; divisions of intellectual status and the differential valuation of researchers and research labour; divisions of formal power and the management structure of research teams; and exertions of informal power and the micropolitics of research teams. We suggest that feminist research management and feminist management, more generally, need to recognize and accept differences and inequalities among feminists and work with these issues in reflexive, ethical and caring ways.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)481-502
Number of pages22
JournalGender, Work and Organization
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

management
education
contract research
manager
Research management
micro-politics
division of labor
equality
obligation
equity
research project
labor
reform
experience
Managers

Keywords

  • feminist management
  • research management
  • divisions of labour
  • research teams
  • power

Cite this

Feminist research management in higher education in Britain : possibilities and practices. / Mauthner, Natasha S; Edwards, Rosalind.

In: Gender, Work and Organization, Vol. 17, No. 5, 09.2010, p. 481-502.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mauthner, Natasha S ; Edwards, Rosalind. / Feminist research management in higher education in Britain : possibilities and practices. In: Gender, Work and Organization. 2010 ; Vol. 17, No. 5. pp. 481-502.
@article{a6e1b81511ed4b139351229dc5036ac6,
title = "Feminist research management in higher education in Britain: possibilities and practices",
abstract = "This article aims to explore the possibilities and ambivalent practices of feminist management in the context of research management in higher education in Britain. Drawing on a reflexive and critical analysis of our experiences of contract research and research management over the past 15 years, we discuss the challenges of putting feminist management principles into practice in team-based and collaborative research projects. By rendering academic cultures increasingly competitive, individualist and managerial, we argue, new managerialist reforms in higher education over the past two decades have intensified those very aspects of academic life that feminists have long struggled with. In particular, in creating the new subject position of research manager, with concomitant institutional expectations and obligations, new managerialism has exacerbated tensions between our identities as feminists, scholars and managers and between collective, individual and institutional needs and aspirations. We illustrate these tensions through a discussion of four related aspects of team research which, we suggest, undermine attempts at implementing the feminist ideals of intellectual equity and political equality: divisions of labour in research teams; divisions of intellectual status and the differential valuation of researchers and research labour; divisions of formal power and the management structure of research teams; and exertions of informal power and the micropolitics of research teams. We suggest that feminist research management and feminist management, more generally, need to recognize and accept differences and inequalities among feminists and work with these issues in reflexive, ethical and caring ways.",
keywords = "feminist management, research management, divisions of labour, research teams, power",
author = "Mauthner, {Natasha S} and Rosalind Edwards",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00522.x",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "481--502",
journal = "Gender, Work and Organization",
issn = "0968-6673",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feminist research management in higher education in Britain

T2 - possibilities and practices

AU - Mauthner, Natasha S

AU - Edwards, Rosalind

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - This article aims to explore the possibilities and ambivalent practices of feminist management in the context of research management in higher education in Britain. Drawing on a reflexive and critical analysis of our experiences of contract research and research management over the past 15 years, we discuss the challenges of putting feminist management principles into practice in team-based and collaborative research projects. By rendering academic cultures increasingly competitive, individualist and managerial, we argue, new managerialist reforms in higher education over the past two decades have intensified those very aspects of academic life that feminists have long struggled with. In particular, in creating the new subject position of research manager, with concomitant institutional expectations and obligations, new managerialism has exacerbated tensions between our identities as feminists, scholars and managers and between collective, individual and institutional needs and aspirations. We illustrate these tensions through a discussion of four related aspects of team research which, we suggest, undermine attempts at implementing the feminist ideals of intellectual equity and political equality: divisions of labour in research teams; divisions of intellectual status and the differential valuation of researchers and research labour; divisions of formal power and the management structure of research teams; and exertions of informal power and the micropolitics of research teams. We suggest that feminist research management and feminist management, more generally, need to recognize and accept differences and inequalities among feminists and work with these issues in reflexive, ethical and caring ways.

AB - This article aims to explore the possibilities and ambivalent practices of feminist management in the context of research management in higher education in Britain. Drawing on a reflexive and critical analysis of our experiences of contract research and research management over the past 15 years, we discuss the challenges of putting feminist management principles into practice in team-based and collaborative research projects. By rendering academic cultures increasingly competitive, individualist and managerial, we argue, new managerialist reforms in higher education over the past two decades have intensified those very aspects of academic life that feminists have long struggled with. In particular, in creating the new subject position of research manager, with concomitant institutional expectations and obligations, new managerialism has exacerbated tensions between our identities as feminists, scholars and managers and between collective, individual and institutional needs and aspirations. We illustrate these tensions through a discussion of four related aspects of team research which, we suggest, undermine attempts at implementing the feminist ideals of intellectual equity and political equality: divisions of labour in research teams; divisions of intellectual status and the differential valuation of researchers and research labour; divisions of formal power and the management structure of research teams; and exertions of informal power and the micropolitics of research teams. We suggest that feminist research management and feminist management, more generally, need to recognize and accept differences and inequalities among feminists and work with these issues in reflexive, ethical and caring ways.

KW - feminist management

KW - research management

KW - divisions of labour

KW - research teams

KW - power

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00522.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00522.x

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 481

EP - 502

JO - Gender, Work and Organization

JF - Gender, Work and Organization

SN - 0968-6673

IS - 5

ER -