This article is a methodological experiment in ‘live’ theology. We reflect on the difficulty of creating theological meaning in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic. This paper stages an interaction between trauma theology, disability theology, and autoethnographic and ethnographic reflections. We explore a particular ‘double bind’ between silence and speech: the pressure to ‘theologise’ during times of crisis, and the awareness that words and theory can cause deep damage in the midst of unfolding trauma. While hurried speech can foreclose meaning and mourning, silence risks concealing existing injustices that have been intensified by covid-19. We pay particular attention here to intersections of race, class, poverty, disability, and legal status. Examining the tensions between overwork and inactivity in pandemic time, we draw on the work of Shelly Rambo and Karen Bray, and consider dislocated time as resistance to hasty solutions, the rush towards resurrection hope, and modes of redemptive productivity. We confront the desires of practical theology to be found useful in times of trauma and crisis. Instead, we suggest theological practices of remaining in dislocated time, and of fragmented speech. These are practices that resist being rehabilitated into unjust systems in times of global trauma.
|Number of pages||15|
|Early online date||19 Jan 2021|
|Publication status||Published - 2021|
- silence and speech
- crip time