Freedom of thought in the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo attacks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The terrorist atrocities perpetrated against the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo on 7 January 2015 led to a national and international outpouring of anger and solidarity with the victims. This solidarity came to be expressed most clearly via the social media hashtag #JeSuisCharlie which spread across networks such as Facebook and Twitter in the hours and days after the shootings. In the first part of this article, I explore how the ‘Je suis Charlie’ slogan was not universally accepted, and how it was problematic for individuals to express themselves if they condemned the terrorist attacks but did not want to proclaim ‘Je suis Charlie’. The second and main part of the article will focus in particular on the freedom of thought of certain intellectuals, whose voices have arguably been sidelined and discredited in the wake of the attacks because their analysis of events did not correspond to the logic of the ‘Je suis Charlie’ response.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)233-244
Number of pages12
JournalFrench Cultural Studies
Volume27
Issue number3
Early online date14 Jul 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2016

Fingerprint

solidarity
twitter
facebook
social media
anger
intellectual
magazine
event
Terrorist
Freedom of Thought
Attack
Solidarity
Facebook
Anger
Logic
Slogan
Social Media
Atrocities
Satirical Magazine

Keywords

  • freedom of thought
  • freedom of speech
  • Charlie Hebdo
  • Emmnauel Todd
  • equality

Cite this

Freedom of thought in the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo attacks. / Kiwan, Nadia.

In: French Cultural Studies, Vol. 27, No. 3, 01.08.2016, p. 233-244.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6c031d62974a49f0a7ed1a58acf02657,
title = "Freedom of thought in the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo attacks",
abstract = "The terrorist atrocities perpetrated against the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo on 7 January 2015 led to a national and international outpouring of anger and solidarity with the victims. This solidarity came to be expressed most clearly via the social media hashtag #JeSuisCharlie which spread across networks such as Facebook and Twitter in the hours and days after the shootings. In the first part of this article, I explore how the ‘Je suis Charlie’ slogan was not universally accepted, and how it was problematic for individuals to express themselves if they condemned the terrorist attacks but did not want to proclaim ‘Je suis Charlie’. The second and main part of the article will focus in particular on the freedom of thought of certain intellectuals, whose voices have arguably been sidelined and discredited in the wake of the attacks because their analysis of events did not correspond to the logic of the ‘Je suis Charlie’ response.",
keywords = "freedom of thought, freedom of speech, Charlie Hebdo, Emmnauel Todd, equality",
author = "Nadia Kiwan",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0957155816648103",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "233--244",
journal = "French Cultural Studies",
issn = "0957-1558",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Freedom of thought in the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo attacks

AU - Kiwan, Nadia

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - The terrorist atrocities perpetrated against the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo on 7 January 2015 led to a national and international outpouring of anger and solidarity with the victims. This solidarity came to be expressed most clearly via the social media hashtag #JeSuisCharlie which spread across networks such as Facebook and Twitter in the hours and days after the shootings. In the first part of this article, I explore how the ‘Je suis Charlie’ slogan was not universally accepted, and how it was problematic for individuals to express themselves if they condemned the terrorist attacks but did not want to proclaim ‘Je suis Charlie’. The second and main part of the article will focus in particular on the freedom of thought of certain intellectuals, whose voices have arguably been sidelined and discredited in the wake of the attacks because their analysis of events did not correspond to the logic of the ‘Je suis Charlie’ response.

AB - The terrorist atrocities perpetrated against the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo on 7 January 2015 led to a national and international outpouring of anger and solidarity with the victims. This solidarity came to be expressed most clearly via the social media hashtag #JeSuisCharlie which spread across networks such as Facebook and Twitter in the hours and days after the shootings. In the first part of this article, I explore how the ‘Je suis Charlie’ slogan was not universally accepted, and how it was problematic for individuals to express themselves if they condemned the terrorist attacks but did not want to proclaim ‘Je suis Charlie’. The second and main part of the article will focus in particular on the freedom of thought of certain intellectuals, whose voices have arguably been sidelined and discredited in the wake of the attacks because their analysis of events did not correspond to the logic of the ‘Je suis Charlie’ response.

KW - freedom of thought

KW - freedom of speech

KW - Charlie Hebdo

KW - Emmnauel Todd

KW - equality

U2 - 10.1177/0957155816648103

DO - 10.1177/0957155816648103

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 233

EP - 244

JO - French Cultural Studies

JF - French Cultural Studies

SN - 0957-1558

IS - 3

ER -