Fugacity modelling to predict the distribution of organic contaminants in the soil: oil matrix of constructed biopiles

Simon J. T. Pollard, Rupert L. Hough, Kye-Hoon Kim, Jessica Bellarby, Graeme Paton, Kirk T. Semple, Frederic Coulon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Level I and II fugacity approaches were used to model the environmental distribution of benzene, anthracene, phenanthrene, 1-methylphenanthrene and benzo[a]pyrene in a four phase biopile system, accounting for air, water, mineral soil and non-aqueous phase liquid (oil) phase. The non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) and soil phases were the dominant partition media for the contaminants in each biopile and the contaminants differed markedly in their individual fugacities. Comparison of three soils with different percentage of organic carbon (% org C) showed that the % org C influenced contaminant partitioning behaviour. While benzene showed an aqueous concentration worthy of note for leachate control during biopiling, other organic chemicals showed that insignificant amount of chemicals leached into the water, greatly reducing the potential extent of groundwater contamination. Level II fugacity model showed that degradation was the dominant removal process except for benzene. In all three biopile systems, the rate of degradation of benzo(a)pyrene was low, requiring more than 12 years for soil concentrations from a spill of about 25 kg (100 mol) to be reduced to a concentration of 0.001 mu g g(-1). The removal time of 1-methylphenanthrene and either anthracene or phenanthrene was about 1 and 3 years, respectively. In contrast, benzene showed the highest degradation rate and was removed after 136 days in all biopile systems. Overall, this study confirms the association of risk critical contaminants with the residual saturation in treated soils and reinforces the importance of accounting for the partitioning behaviour of both NAPL and soil phases during the risk assessment of oil-contaminated sites. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1432-1439
Number of pages8
JournalChemosphere
Volume71
Issue number8
Early online date11 Feb 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2008

Bibliographical note

A paid open access option is available for this journal.
Voluntary deposit by author of pre-print allowed on Institutions open scholarly website and pre-print servers
Voluntary deposit by author of authors post-print allowed on institutions open scholarly website including Institutional Repository
Deposit due to Funding Body, Institutional and Governmental mandate only allowed where separate agreement between repository and publisher exists
Set statement to accompany deposit
Published source must be acknowledged
Must link to journal home page or articles' DOI
Publisher's version/PDF cannot be used
Articles in some journals can be made Open Access on payment of additional charge
NIH Authors articles will be submitted to PMC after 12 months
Authors who are required to deposit in subject repositories may also use Sponsorship Option
Pre-print can not be deposited for The Lancet

Keywords

  • biopiling
  • bioremediation
  • fugacity
  • modelling
  • organic contaminants
  • oil
  • polycyclic aromatic-hydrocarbons
  • performance assessment
  • component classes
  • aged soils
  • petroleum
  • wastes
  • sites
  • bioavailability
  • biodegradation
  • risk

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fugacity modelling to predict the distribution of organic contaminants in the soil: oil matrix of constructed biopiles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this