Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Computational Models of Argument |
| Subtitle of host publication | Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2016) |
| Editors | Pietro Baroni, Thomas F. Gordon, Tatjana Scheffler, Manfred Stede |
| Publisher | IOS Press |
| Pages | 447-548 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781614996866 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781614996859 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
| Event | COMMA 2016 - University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany Duration: 13 Sep 2016 → 16 Sep 2016 |
Publication series
| Name | Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications |
|---|---|
| Publisher | IOS Press |
| Volume | 287 |
| ISSN (Print) | 0922-6389 |
| ISSN (Electronic) | 1879-8314 |
Conference
| Conference | COMMA 2016 |
|---|---|
| Country | Germany |
| City | Potsdam |
| Period | 13/09/16 → 16/09/16 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- fuzzy argumentation
- abstract argumentation
- semantics
Cite this
Gödel Fuzzy Argumentation Frameworks. / Wu, Jiachao; Li, Hengfei; Oren, Nir; Norman, Timothy J.
Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2016). ed. / Pietro Baroni; Thomas F. Gordon; Tatjana Scheffler; Manfred Stede. IOS Press, 2016. p. 447-548 (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 287).Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Gödel Fuzzy Argumentation Frameworks
AU - Wu, Jiachao
AU - Li, Hengfei
AU - Oren, Nir
AU - Norman, Timothy J.
N1 - Acknowledgements This work is supported by the Excellent Young Scholars Research Fund of Shandong Normal University. This research was sponsored by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory and the U.K. Ministry of Defence and was accomplished under Agreement Number W911NF-06-3-0001.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - In this paper we combine fuzzy set theory and argumentation to facilitate the use of fuzzy arguments and attacks. Unlike many existing approaches, our work does not require the use of any parameters, bringing it closer to Dung's work in spirit. We begin by introducing Fuzzy Argumentation Frameworks, and specialise them using the Gödel t-norm. We then examine this framework's properties and show that the standard Dung extensions are obtained, though the stable semantics coincide with the preferred. Finally, we examine the relationship between our framework and Dung's original system, as well as the existing fuzzy frameworks, describing where they overlap and differ.
AB - In this paper we combine fuzzy set theory and argumentation to facilitate the use of fuzzy arguments and attacks. Unlike many existing approaches, our work does not require the use of any parameters, bringing it closer to Dung's work in spirit. We begin by introducing Fuzzy Argumentation Frameworks, and specialise them using the Gödel t-norm. We then examine this framework's properties and show that the standard Dung extensions are obtained, though the stable semantics coincide with the preferred. Finally, we examine the relationship between our framework and Dung's original system, as well as the existing fuzzy frameworks, describing where they overlap and differ.
KW - fuzzy argumentation
KW - abstract argumentation
KW - semantics
U2 - 10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-447
DO - 10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-447
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 9781614996859
T3 - Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
SP - 447
EP - 548
BT - Computational Models of Argument
A2 - Baroni, Pietro
A2 - Gordon, Thomas F.
A2 - Scheffler, Tatjana
A2 - Stede, Manfred
PB - IOS Press
ER -