Good and bad religion: resisting essentialist discourse

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

We argue that there is a well-intentioned - yet mistaken - definitional turn within contemporary cultural discourse in which ‘true’ religion, being essentially loving and peaceful, is distinguished from ‘false’ religion. Concerned with the possibility that this discourse might be prevalent in school Religious Education (RE), we surveyed practicing RE teachers within the United Kingdom (UK) on their beliefs about religion. We wanted to see how far they subscribe to a strand of contemporary cultural discourse which, we argue, has ‘bad’ religion as false religion. Responses from 465 teachers to our online survey indicate that many RE teachers understand religion(s) as essentially benign or pro-social and present it/them as such in the classroom. We argue that RE can only foster religious literacy if religions are presented as multifarious, complex, social phenomena. This cannot be predicated upon an essentialist conceptualization of harmful religion as ‘false’ religion, which is inimical to understanding religion in the world today - as in times past. We conclude that this conceptualization is a barrier to UK RE meeting both its extrinsic purpose to educate, and one of its intrinsic purposes to foster tolerance and pro-social attitudes.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 7 Mar 2018
EventEuropean Academy of Religion - First Annual Conference 2018 - Bologna - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Duration: 5 Mar 20188 Mar 2018
Conference number: 1
https://www.europeanacademyofreligion.org/first-annual-conference

Conference

ConferenceEuropean Academy of Religion - First Annual Conference 2018 - Bologna
CountryItaly
CityBologna
Period5/03/188/03/18
Internet address

Fingerprint

Essentialist
Discourse
Religion
Religious Education
Conceptualization
Literacy
Extrinsic
Intrinsic
Social Attitudes
Tolerance
Social Phenomena

Keywords

  • Religion
  • Religious Education
  • Essentialism
  • Teacher Beliefs
  • Religion and Schools
  • UK Schools

Cite this

Nixon, G., Smith, D. R., & Pearce, J. (2018). Good and bad religion: resisting essentialist discourse. Paper presented at European Academy of Religion - First Annual Conference 2018 - Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Good and bad religion: resisting essentialist discourse. / Nixon, Graeme; Smith, David Raymond; Pearce, Jo.

2018. Paper presented at European Academy of Religion - First Annual Conference 2018 - Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Nixon, G, Smith, DR & Pearce, J 2018, 'Good and bad religion: resisting essentialist discourse' Paper presented at European Academy of Religion - First Annual Conference 2018 - Bologna, Bologna, Italy, 5/03/18 - 8/03/18, .
Nixon G, Smith DR, Pearce J. Good and bad religion: resisting essentialist discourse. 2018. Paper presented at European Academy of Religion - First Annual Conference 2018 - Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Nixon, Graeme ; Smith, David Raymond ; Pearce, Jo. / Good and bad religion: resisting essentialist discourse. Paper presented at European Academy of Religion - First Annual Conference 2018 - Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
@conference{0a5adad9b8dc4dfc8b94637c0393dfed,
title = "Good and bad religion: resisting essentialist discourse",
abstract = "We argue that there is a well-intentioned - yet mistaken - definitional turn within contemporary cultural discourse in which ‘true’ religion, being essentially loving and peaceful, is distinguished from ‘false’ religion. Concerned with the possibility that this discourse might be prevalent in school Religious Education (RE), we surveyed practicing RE teachers within the United Kingdom (UK) on their beliefs about religion. We wanted to see how far they subscribe to a strand of contemporary cultural discourse which, we argue, has ‘bad’ religion as false religion. Responses from 465 teachers to our online survey indicate that many RE teachers understand religion(s) as essentially benign or pro-social and present it/them as such in the classroom. We argue that RE can only foster religious literacy if religions are presented as multifarious, complex, social phenomena. This cannot be predicated upon an essentialist conceptualization of harmful religion as ‘false’ religion, which is inimical to understanding religion in the world today - as in times past. We conclude that this conceptualization is a barrier to UK RE meeting both its extrinsic purpose to educate, and one of its intrinsic purposes to foster tolerance and pro-social attitudes.",
keywords = "Religion, Religious Education, Essentialism, Teacher Beliefs, Religion and Schools, UK Schools",
author = "Graeme Nixon and Smith, {David Raymond} and Jo Pearce",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "7",
language = "English",
note = "European Academy of Religion - First Annual Conference 2018 - Bologna ; Conference date: 05-03-2018 Through 08-03-2018",
url = "https://www.europeanacademyofreligion.org/first-annual-conference",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Good and bad religion: resisting essentialist discourse

AU - Nixon, Graeme

AU - Smith, David Raymond

AU - Pearce, Jo

PY - 2018/3/7

Y1 - 2018/3/7

N2 - We argue that there is a well-intentioned - yet mistaken - definitional turn within contemporary cultural discourse in which ‘true’ religion, being essentially loving and peaceful, is distinguished from ‘false’ religion. Concerned with the possibility that this discourse might be prevalent in school Religious Education (RE), we surveyed practicing RE teachers within the United Kingdom (UK) on their beliefs about religion. We wanted to see how far they subscribe to a strand of contemporary cultural discourse which, we argue, has ‘bad’ religion as false religion. Responses from 465 teachers to our online survey indicate that many RE teachers understand religion(s) as essentially benign or pro-social and present it/them as such in the classroom. We argue that RE can only foster religious literacy if religions are presented as multifarious, complex, social phenomena. This cannot be predicated upon an essentialist conceptualization of harmful religion as ‘false’ religion, which is inimical to understanding religion in the world today - as in times past. We conclude that this conceptualization is a barrier to UK RE meeting both its extrinsic purpose to educate, and one of its intrinsic purposes to foster tolerance and pro-social attitudes.

AB - We argue that there is a well-intentioned - yet mistaken - definitional turn within contemporary cultural discourse in which ‘true’ religion, being essentially loving and peaceful, is distinguished from ‘false’ religion. Concerned with the possibility that this discourse might be prevalent in school Religious Education (RE), we surveyed practicing RE teachers within the United Kingdom (UK) on their beliefs about religion. We wanted to see how far they subscribe to a strand of contemporary cultural discourse which, we argue, has ‘bad’ religion as false religion. Responses from 465 teachers to our online survey indicate that many RE teachers understand religion(s) as essentially benign or pro-social and present it/them as such in the classroom. We argue that RE can only foster religious literacy if religions are presented as multifarious, complex, social phenomena. This cannot be predicated upon an essentialist conceptualization of harmful religion as ‘false’ religion, which is inimical to understanding religion in the world today - as in times past. We conclude that this conceptualization is a barrier to UK RE meeting both its extrinsic purpose to educate, and one of its intrinsic purposes to foster tolerance and pro-social attitudes.

KW - Religion

KW - Religious Education

KW - Essentialism

KW - Teacher Beliefs

KW - Religion and Schools

KW - UK Schools

M3 - Paper

ER -