Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of agricultural land in Great Britain

N. Fitton, C. P. Ejerenwa, A. Bhogal, P. Edgington, H. Black, A. Lilly, D. Barraclough, F. Worrall, J. Hillier, Pete Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation potential of croplands and grasslands in Great Britain under different management practices. We consider the feasible land management options for grass and cropland using county level land-use data with estimates of per-area mitigation potential for individual and total GHGs, to identify the land management options with the greatest cost-effective mitigation potential. We show that for grasslands, uncertainties still remain on the mitigation potential because of their climatic sensitivity and also their less intensive management. For croplands in Great Britain, the technical mean GHG mitigation potentials for all cropland management practices range from 17 Mt CO2-eq. per 20 yr to 39 Mt CO2-eq. per 20 yr. There are significant regional variation in all cases, with the greatest potentials in England, negligible potential in Wales and intermediate potential in Scotland, with country differences largely driven by the areas of cropland and grassland in each country. Practices such as agronomic improvement and nutrient management are the most promising options because of their impact on N2O emissions and also their larger potential at low cost. In terms of annual emissions from agriculture, calculated mitigation potentials are small, where the technical mitigation potential of agronomy and nutrient management strategies are ca. 4.5 and 3.8%, respectively (agricultural emissions account for ca. 9% or 47.7 Mt CO2-eq., of total Great Britain GHG emissions, Department of Energy and Climate Change, UK). However when compared with the land use, land-use change and forestry sector (LULUCF) emissions, nutrient management would reduce further emission reductions by approximately half of the 2005 LULUCF sink (i.e.) 1.6 Mt CO2-eq. per year).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)491-501
Number of pages11
JournalSoil Use & Management
Volume27
Issue number4
Early online date18 Aug 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

Keywords

  • Management practices
  • agricultural land
  • Great Britain
  • greenhouse gases
  • mitigation potential
  • climate-change commitments
  • organic-carbon storage
  • soil carbon
  • grassland management
  • global context
  • crop-rotation
  • sequestration
  • emissions
  • nitrogen
  • impacts

Cite this

Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of agricultural land in Great Britain. / Fitton, N.; Ejerenwa, C. P.; Bhogal, A.; Edgington, P.; Black, H.; Lilly, A.; Barraclough, D.; Worrall, F.; Hillier, J.; Smith, Pete.

In: Soil Use & Management, Vol. 27, No. 4, 12.2011, p. 491-501.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fitton, N, Ejerenwa, CP, Bhogal, A, Edgington, P, Black, H, Lilly, A, Barraclough, D, Worrall, F, Hillier, J & Smith, P 2011, 'Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of agricultural land in Great Britain', Soil Use & Management, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 491-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00365.x
Fitton, N. ; Ejerenwa, C. P. ; Bhogal, A. ; Edgington, P. ; Black, H. ; Lilly, A. ; Barraclough, D. ; Worrall, F. ; Hillier, J. ; Smith, Pete. / Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of agricultural land in Great Britain. In: Soil Use & Management. 2011 ; Vol. 27, No. 4. pp. 491-501.
@article{a661d27273cb411fa234c4f6992c620a,
title = "Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of agricultural land in Great Britain",
abstract = "The aim of this paper is to assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation potential of croplands and grasslands in Great Britain under different management practices. We consider the feasible land management options for grass and cropland using county level land-use data with estimates of per-area mitigation potential for individual and total GHGs, to identify the land management options with the greatest cost-effective mitigation potential. We show that for grasslands, uncertainties still remain on the mitigation potential because of their climatic sensitivity and also their less intensive management. For croplands in Great Britain, the technical mean GHG mitigation potentials for all cropland management practices range from 17 Mt CO2-eq. per 20 yr to 39 Mt CO2-eq. per 20 yr. There are significant regional variation in all cases, with the greatest potentials in England, negligible potential in Wales and intermediate potential in Scotland, with country differences largely driven by the areas of cropland and grassland in each country. Practices such as agronomic improvement and nutrient management are the most promising options because of their impact on N2O emissions and also their larger potential at low cost. In terms of annual emissions from agriculture, calculated mitigation potentials are small, where the technical mitigation potential of agronomy and nutrient management strategies are ca. 4.5 and 3.8{\%}, respectively (agricultural emissions account for ca. 9{\%} or 47.7 Mt CO2-eq., of total Great Britain GHG emissions, Department of Energy and Climate Change, UK). However when compared with the land use, land-use change and forestry sector (LULUCF) emissions, nutrient management would reduce further emission reductions by approximately half of the 2005 LULUCF sink (i.e.) 1.6 Mt CO2-eq. per year).",
keywords = "Management practices, agricultural land, Great Britain, greenhouse gases, mitigation potential, climate-change commitments, organic-carbon storage, soil carbon, grassland management, global context, crop-rotation, sequestration, emissions, nitrogen, impacts",
author = "N. Fitton and Ejerenwa, {C. P.} and A. Bhogal and P. Edgington and H. Black and A. Lilly and D. Barraclough and F. Worrall and J. Hillier and Pete Smith",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00365.x",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "491--501",
journal = "Soil Use & Management",
issn = "0266-0032",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of agricultural land in Great Britain

AU - Fitton, N.

AU - Ejerenwa, C. P.

AU - Bhogal, A.

AU - Edgington, P.

AU - Black, H.

AU - Lilly, A.

AU - Barraclough, D.

AU - Worrall, F.

AU - Hillier, J.

AU - Smith, Pete

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - The aim of this paper is to assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation potential of croplands and grasslands in Great Britain under different management practices. We consider the feasible land management options for grass and cropland using county level land-use data with estimates of per-area mitigation potential for individual and total GHGs, to identify the land management options with the greatest cost-effective mitigation potential. We show that for grasslands, uncertainties still remain on the mitigation potential because of their climatic sensitivity and also their less intensive management. For croplands in Great Britain, the technical mean GHG mitigation potentials for all cropland management practices range from 17 Mt CO2-eq. per 20 yr to 39 Mt CO2-eq. per 20 yr. There are significant regional variation in all cases, with the greatest potentials in England, negligible potential in Wales and intermediate potential in Scotland, with country differences largely driven by the areas of cropland and grassland in each country. Practices such as agronomic improvement and nutrient management are the most promising options because of their impact on N2O emissions and also their larger potential at low cost. In terms of annual emissions from agriculture, calculated mitigation potentials are small, where the technical mitigation potential of agronomy and nutrient management strategies are ca. 4.5 and 3.8%, respectively (agricultural emissions account for ca. 9% or 47.7 Mt CO2-eq., of total Great Britain GHG emissions, Department of Energy and Climate Change, UK). However when compared with the land use, land-use change and forestry sector (LULUCF) emissions, nutrient management would reduce further emission reductions by approximately half of the 2005 LULUCF sink (i.e.) 1.6 Mt CO2-eq. per year).

AB - The aim of this paper is to assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation potential of croplands and grasslands in Great Britain under different management practices. We consider the feasible land management options for grass and cropland using county level land-use data with estimates of per-area mitigation potential for individual and total GHGs, to identify the land management options with the greatest cost-effective mitigation potential. We show that for grasslands, uncertainties still remain on the mitigation potential because of their climatic sensitivity and also their less intensive management. For croplands in Great Britain, the technical mean GHG mitigation potentials for all cropland management practices range from 17 Mt CO2-eq. per 20 yr to 39 Mt CO2-eq. per 20 yr. There are significant regional variation in all cases, with the greatest potentials in England, negligible potential in Wales and intermediate potential in Scotland, with country differences largely driven by the areas of cropland and grassland in each country. Practices such as agronomic improvement and nutrient management are the most promising options because of their impact on N2O emissions and also their larger potential at low cost. In terms of annual emissions from agriculture, calculated mitigation potentials are small, where the technical mitigation potential of agronomy and nutrient management strategies are ca. 4.5 and 3.8%, respectively (agricultural emissions account for ca. 9% or 47.7 Mt CO2-eq., of total Great Britain GHG emissions, Department of Energy and Climate Change, UK). However when compared with the land use, land-use change and forestry sector (LULUCF) emissions, nutrient management would reduce further emission reductions by approximately half of the 2005 LULUCF sink (i.e.) 1.6 Mt CO2-eq. per year).

KW - Management practices

KW - agricultural land

KW - Great Britain

KW - greenhouse gases

KW - mitigation potential

KW - climate-change commitments

KW - organic-carbon storage

KW - soil carbon

KW - grassland management

KW - global context

KW - crop-rotation

KW - sequestration

KW - emissions

KW - nitrogen

KW - impacts

U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00365.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00365.x

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 491

EP - 501

JO - Soil Use & Management

JF - Soil Use & Management

SN - 0266-0032

IS - 4

ER -