Group therapy for metastatic cancer patients: report of an intervention

S P Llewelyn, A Murray, Marie Johnston, Derek Johnston, P E Preest, J A Dewar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper describes results of group-based therapy for metastatic cancer patients, based on Leventhal et al.'s (1984) Model of Coping. The study investigated, first, the suitability of group treatment designed both to enhance emotional expression, and to elicit and solve problems, amongst a predominately rural population in north east Scotland; and second, the outcome and process of such a group. Psychometric and process measures were taken before, during and after group treatment. Referral rate was lower than anticipated and attrition rate was high. Most psychometric test results did not show improvement in mental health scores, although reported satisfaction was high. Content analysis of a sample of utterances, coded reliably into Spiegel and Spira's (1991) category system, showed that the majority of utterances (29%) concerned family and social network issues while a minority of utterances concerned death and dying (2%), although several women died during the study. It is argued that the group was helpful to some women, but that overall, its effect on mental health was limited. The study did not therefore provide a strong endorsement of the use of group support within this cultural context, although process analysis showed its relevance to individual women's concerns.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-240
Number of pages12
JournalPsychology, Health & Medicine
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Group Psychotherapy
Psychometrics
Mental Health
Neoplasms
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Scotland
Rural Population
Social Support
Referral and Consultation
Therapeutics

Cite this

Group therapy for metastatic cancer patients : report of an intervention. / Llewelyn, S P; Murray, A; Johnston, Marie; Johnston, Derek; Preest, P E; Dewar, J A.

In: Psychology, Health & Medicine, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1999, p. 229-240.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Llewelyn, S P ; Murray, A ; Johnston, Marie ; Johnston, Derek ; Preest, P E ; Dewar, J A. / Group therapy for metastatic cancer patients : report of an intervention. In: Psychology, Health & Medicine. 1999 ; Vol. 4, No. 3. pp. 229-240.
@article{45b56b9b6c6b46fd98fbaae509197e37,
title = "Group therapy for metastatic cancer patients: report of an intervention",
abstract = "This paper describes results of group-based therapy for metastatic cancer patients, based on Leventhal et al.'s (1984) Model of Coping. The study investigated, first, the suitability of group treatment designed both to enhance emotional expression, and to elicit and solve problems, amongst a predominately rural population in north east Scotland; and second, the outcome and process of such a group. Psychometric and process measures were taken before, during and after group treatment. Referral rate was lower than anticipated and attrition rate was high. Most psychometric test results did not show improvement in mental health scores, although reported satisfaction was high. Content analysis of a sample of utterances, coded reliably into Spiegel and Spira's (1991) category system, showed that the majority of utterances (29{\%}) concerned family and social network issues while a minority of utterances concerned death and dying (2{\%}), although several women died during the study. It is argued that the group was helpful to some women, but that overall, its effect on mental health was limited. The study did not therefore provide a strong endorsement of the use of group support within this cultural context, although process analysis showed its relevance to individual women's concerns.",
author = "Llewelyn, {S P} and A Murray and Marie Johnston and Derek Johnston and Preest, {P E} and Dewar, {J A}",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1080/135485099106171",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "229--240",
journal = "Psychology, Health & Medicine",
issn = "1354-8506",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Group therapy for metastatic cancer patients

T2 - report of an intervention

AU - Llewelyn, S P

AU - Murray, A

AU - Johnston, Marie

AU - Johnston, Derek

AU - Preest, P E

AU - Dewar, J A

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - This paper describes results of group-based therapy for metastatic cancer patients, based on Leventhal et al.'s (1984) Model of Coping. The study investigated, first, the suitability of group treatment designed both to enhance emotional expression, and to elicit and solve problems, amongst a predominately rural population in north east Scotland; and second, the outcome and process of such a group. Psychometric and process measures were taken before, during and after group treatment. Referral rate was lower than anticipated and attrition rate was high. Most psychometric test results did not show improvement in mental health scores, although reported satisfaction was high. Content analysis of a sample of utterances, coded reliably into Spiegel and Spira's (1991) category system, showed that the majority of utterances (29%) concerned family and social network issues while a minority of utterances concerned death and dying (2%), although several women died during the study. It is argued that the group was helpful to some women, but that overall, its effect on mental health was limited. The study did not therefore provide a strong endorsement of the use of group support within this cultural context, although process analysis showed its relevance to individual women's concerns.

AB - This paper describes results of group-based therapy for metastatic cancer patients, based on Leventhal et al.'s (1984) Model of Coping. The study investigated, first, the suitability of group treatment designed both to enhance emotional expression, and to elicit and solve problems, amongst a predominately rural population in north east Scotland; and second, the outcome and process of such a group. Psychometric and process measures were taken before, during and after group treatment. Referral rate was lower than anticipated and attrition rate was high. Most psychometric test results did not show improvement in mental health scores, although reported satisfaction was high. Content analysis of a sample of utterances, coded reliably into Spiegel and Spira's (1991) category system, showed that the majority of utterances (29%) concerned family and social network issues while a minority of utterances concerned death and dying (2%), although several women died during the study. It is argued that the group was helpful to some women, but that overall, its effect on mental health was limited. The study did not therefore provide a strong endorsement of the use of group support within this cultural context, although process analysis showed its relevance to individual women's concerns.

U2 - 10.1080/135485099106171

DO - 10.1080/135485099106171

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 229

EP - 240

JO - Psychology, Health & Medicine

JF - Psychology, Health & Medicine

SN - 1354-8506

IS - 3

ER -