Abstract
People can identify their own fixations compared to those of someone else but only slightly above
chance (Foulsham and Kingstone, 2013). This conclusion is based on fixations recorded during a
scene memory task, so people may remember fixated objects as opposed to eye movements. In
oculomotor capture (Theeuwes et al 1998), in contrast, it has been claimed that people are
unaware of their own erroneous saccades towards distractors. This claim is based on general
statements of remembered accuracy made after the experiment. Here we asked whether people
could accurately report on their own eye movements using three different approaches: first, we
asked participants after a visual search experiment to discriminate their own eye movements from
those of someone else searching the same image. Second, we asked participants in an oculomotor
capture experiment to report after each trial whether they looked directly at the target. Third, we
replayed an animation of saccades after each trial in a double-step saccade experiment and asked
participants if they were viewing their own or someone else’s behaviour. The results across all
three studies suggest that observers are sensitive to what they looked at, but have little knowledge
about their own eyemovements per se.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 3T2A004 |
Pages (from-to) | 272 |
Number of pages | 1 |
Journal | Perception |
Volume | 44 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2015 |
Event | 38th European Conference on Visual Perception (ECVP) 2015 Liverpool - Liverpool, United Kingdom Duration: 23 Aug 2015 → … |
Keywords
- Eye Movements
- awareness
- visual search
- double step
- oculomotor capture
- memory task