How Do Gestures Influence Thinking and Speaking? The Gesture-for-Conceptualization Hypothesis.

Sotaro Kita (Corresponding Author), Martha W. Alibali, Mingyuan Chu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)
8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

People spontaneously produce gestures during speaking and thinking. The authors focus here on gestures that depict or indicate information related to the contents of concurrent speech or thought (i.e., representational gestures). Previous research indicates that such gestures have not only communicative functions, but also self-oriented cognitive functions. In this article, the authors propose a new theoretical framework, the gesture-for-conceptualization hypothesis, which explains the self-oriented functions of representational gestures. According to this framework, representational gestures affect cognitive processes in 4 main ways: gestures activate, manipulate, package, and explore spatio-motoric information for speaking and thinking. These four functions are shaped by gesture’s ability to schematize information, that is, to focus on a small subset of available information that is potentially relevant to the task at hand. The framework is based on the assumption that gestures are generated from the same system that generates practical actions, such as object manipulation; however, gestures are distinct from practical actions in that they represent information. The framework provides a novel, parsimonious, and comprehensive account of the self-oriented functions of gestures. The authors discuss how the framework accounts for gestures that depict abstract or metaphoric content, and they consider implications for the relations between self-oriented and communicative functions of gestures. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)245-266
Number of pages22
JournalPsychological Review
Volume124
Issue number3
Early online date27 Feb 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2017

Fingerprint

Gestures
Thinking
Aptitude
Cognition

Keywords

  • gesture
  • embodied cognition
  • speech production
  • spatial representation
  • problem solving

Cite this

How Do Gestures Influence Thinking and Speaking? The Gesture-for-Conceptualization Hypothesis. / Kita, Sotaro (Corresponding Author); Alibali, Martha W.; Chu, Mingyuan.

In: Psychological Review, Vol. 124, No. 3, 04.2017, p. 245-266.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{44e2d81e37f0426f93e581008eae9829,
title = "How Do Gestures Influence Thinking and Speaking? The Gesture-for-Conceptualization Hypothesis.",
abstract = "People spontaneously produce gestures during speaking and thinking. The authors focus here on gestures that depict or indicate information related to the contents of concurrent speech or thought (i.e., representational gestures). Previous research indicates that such gestures have not only communicative functions, but also self-oriented cognitive functions. In this article, the authors propose a new theoretical framework, the gesture-for-conceptualization hypothesis, which explains the self-oriented functions of representational gestures. According to this framework, representational gestures affect cognitive processes in 4 main ways: gestures activate, manipulate, package, and explore spatio-motoric information for speaking and thinking. These four functions are shaped by gesture’s ability to schematize information, that is, to focus on a small subset of available information that is potentially relevant to the task at hand. The framework is based on the assumption that gestures are generated from the same system that generates practical actions, such as object manipulation; however, gestures are distinct from practical actions in that they represent information. The framework provides a novel, parsimonious, and comprehensive account of the self-oriented functions of gestures. The authors discuss how the framework accounts for gestures that depict abstract or metaphoric content, and they consider implications for the relations between self-oriented and communicative functions of gestures. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved)",
keywords = "gesture, embodied cognition, speech production, spatial representation, problem solving",
author = "Sotaro Kita and Alibali, {Martha W.} and Mingyuan Chu",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1037/rev0000059",
language = "English",
volume = "124",
pages = "245--266",
journal = "Psychological Review",
issn = "0033-295X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Do Gestures Influence Thinking and Speaking? The Gesture-for-Conceptualization Hypothesis.

AU - Kita, Sotaro

AU - Alibali, Martha W.

AU - Chu, Mingyuan

PY - 2017/4

Y1 - 2017/4

N2 - People spontaneously produce gestures during speaking and thinking. The authors focus here on gestures that depict or indicate information related to the contents of concurrent speech or thought (i.e., representational gestures). Previous research indicates that such gestures have not only communicative functions, but also self-oriented cognitive functions. In this article, the authors propose a new theoretical framework, the gesture-for-conceptualization hypothesis, which explains the self-oriented functions of representational gestures. According to this framework, representational gestures affect cognitive processes in 4 main ways: gestures activate, manipulate, package, and explore spatio-motoric information for speaking and thinking. These four functions are shaped by gesture’s ability to schematize information, that is, to focus on a small subset of available information that is potentially relevant to the task at hand. The framework is based on the assumption that gestures are generated from the same system that generates practical actions, such as object manipulation; however, gestures are distinct from practical actions in that they represent information. The framework provides a novel, parsimonious, and comprehensive account of the self-oriented functions of gestures. The authors discuss how the framework accounts for gestures that depict abstract or metaphoric content, and they consider implications for the relations between self-oriented and communicative functions of gestures. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved)

AB - People spontaneously produce gestures during speaking and thinking. The authors focus here on gestures that depict or indicate information related to the contents of concurrent speech or thought (i.e., representational gestures). Previous research indicates that such gestures have not only communicative functions, but also self-oriented cognitive functions. In this article, the authors propose a new theoretical framework, the gesture-for-conceptualization hypothesis, which explains the self-oriented functions of representational gestures. According to this framework, representational gestures affect cognitive processes in 4 main ways: gestures activate, manipulate, package, and explore spatio-motoric information for speaking and thinking. These four functions are shaped by gesture’s ability to schematize information, that is, to focus on a small subset of available information that is potentially relevant to the task at hand. The framework is based on the assumption that gestures are generated from the same system that generates practical actions, such as object manipulation; however, gestures are distinct from practical actions in that they represent information. The framework provides a novel, parsimonious, and comprehensive account of the self-oriented functions of gestures. The authors discuss how the framework accounts for gestures that depict abstract or metaphoric content, and they consider implications for the relations between self-oriented and communicative functions of gestures. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved)

KW - gesture

KW - embodied cognition

KW - speech production

KW - spatial representation

KW - problem solving

U2 - 10.1037/rev0000059

DO - 10.1037/rev0000059

M3 - Article

VL - 124

SP - 245

EP - 266

JO - Psychological Review

JF - Psychological Review

SN - 0033-295X

IS - 3

ER -