How personal experiences feature in women's accounts of use of information for decisions about antenatal diagnostic testing for foetal abnormality

Emma F. France, Sally Wyke, Sue Ziebland, Vikki A. Entwistle, Kate Hunt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There has been a striking growth in the availability of health-related information based on personal experience in recent years and internet users are often drawn towards other people's stories about their health. Accounts of other people's experiences might convey social and emotional information that is not otherwise available but little is known about how it is used or the implications of its use in practice. This paper examines how people refer to information about other people's experiences when accounting for decisions about antenatal diagnostic testing for foetal abnormality. We conducted a secondary analysis of 37 qualitative interviews undertaken across the UK with 36 women and nine of their male partners (eight couples were interviewed together) who talked about diagnostic testing for foetal abnormality in 55 pregnancies. When describing their decisions, respondents referred to examples of knowledge gleaned from their own and other individuals' experiences as well as information based on biomedical or clinical-epidemiological research (usually about the probabilities of having a child affected by health problems or the probability of diagnostic tests causing miscarriage). Both forms of knowledge were employed in people's accounts to illustrate the legitimacy and internal coherence of decisions taken. The analysis demonstrates the personally idiosyncratic ways that people reflect on and incorporate different types of information to add meaning to abstract ideas about risk, to imagine the consequences for their own lives and to help them to make sense of the decisions they faced.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)755-762
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Science & Medicine
Volume72
Issue number5
Early online date14 Dec 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

diagnostic
Illegitimacy
Health
Spontaneous Abortion
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Internet
experience
Interviews
Pregnancy
Growth
health
Research
secondary analysis
qualitative interview
Diagnostics
Personal Experience
Testing
pregnancy
legitimacy
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • personal experience
  • prenatal diagnosis
  • decision making
  • reproductive behaviour
  • pregnancy
  • patient decision making
  • health knowledge
  • UK

Cite this

How personal experiences feature in women's accounts of use of information for decisions about antenatal diagnostic testing for foetal abnormality. / France, Emma F.; Wyke, Sally; Ziebland, Sue; Entwistle, Vikki A.; Hunt, Kate.

In: Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 72, No. 5, 03.2011, p. 755-762.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

France, Emma F. ; Wyke, Sally ; Ziebland, Sue ; Entwistle, Vikki A. ; Hunt, Kate. / How personal experiences feature in women's accounts of use of information for decisions about antenatal diagnostic testing for foetal abnormality. In: Social Science & Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 72, No. 5. pp. 755-762.
@article{f056ca4738c04524b7df22d71b16e927,
title = "How personal experiences feature in women's accounts of use of information for decisions about antenatal diagnostic testing for foetal abnormality",
abstract = "There has been a striking growth in the availability of health-related information based on personal experience in recent years and internet users are often drawn towards other people's stories about their health. Accounts of other people's experiences might convey social and emotional information that is not otherwise available but little is known about how it is used or the implications of its use in practice. This paper examines how people refer to information about other people's experiences when accounting for decisions about antenatal diagnostic testing for foetal abnormality. We conducted a secondary analysis of 37 qualitative interviews undertaken across the UK with 36 women and nine of their male partners (eight couples were interviewed together) who talked about diagnostic testing for foetal abnormality in 55 pregnancies. When describing their decisions, respondents referred to examples of knowledge gleaned from their own and other individuals' experiences as well as information based on biomedical or clinical-epidemiological research (usually about the probabilities of having a child affected by health problems or the probability of diagnostic tests causing miscarriage). Both forms of knowledge were employed in people's accounts to illustrate the legitimacy and internal coherence of decisions taken. The analysis demonstrates the personally idiosyncratic ways that people reflect on and incorporate different types of information to add meaning to abstract ideas about risk, to imagine the consequences for their own lives and to help them to make sense of the decisions they faced.",
keywords = "personal experience, prenatal diagnosis, decision making, reproductive behaviour, pregnancy, patient decision making, health knowledge , UK",
author = "France, {Emma F.} and Sally Wyke and Sue Ziebland and Entwistle, {Vikki A.} and Kate Hunt",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.031",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "755--762",
journal = "Social Science & Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How personal experiences feature in women's accounts of use of information for decisions about antenatal diagnostic testing for foetal abnormality

AU - France, Emma F.

AU - Wyke, Sally

AU - Ziebland, Sue

AU - Entwistle, Vikki A.

AU - Hunt, Kate

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - There has been a striking growth in the availability of health-related information based on personal experience in recent years and internet users are often drawn towards other people's stories about their health. Accounts of other people's experiences might convey social and emotional information that is not otherwise available but little is known about how it is used or the implications of its use in practice. This paper examines how people refer to information about other people's experiences when accounting for decisions about antenatal diagnostic testing for foetal abnormality. We conducted a secondary analysis of 37 qualitative interviews undertaken across the UK with 36 women and nine of their male partners (eight couples were interviewed together) who talked about diagnostic testing for foetal abnormality in 55 pregnancies. When describing their decisions, respondents referred to examples of knowledge gleaned from their own and other individuals' experiences as well as information based on biomedical or clinical-epidemiological research (usually about the probabilities of having a child affected by health problems or the probability of diagnostic tests causing miscarriage). Both forms of knowledge were employed in people's accounts to illustrate the legitimacy and internal coherence of decisions taken. The analysis demonstrates the personally idiosyncratic ways that people reflect on and incorporate different types of information to add meaning to abstract ideas about risk, to imagine the consequences for their own lives and to help them to make sense of the decisions they faced.

AB - There has been a striking growth in the availability of health-related information based on personal experience in recent years and internet users are often drawn towards other people's stories about their health. Accounts of other people's experiences might convey social and emotional information that is not otherwise available but little is known about how it is used or the implications of its use in practice. This paper examines how people refer to information about other people's experiences when accounting for decisions about antenatal diagnostic testing for foetal abnormality. We conducted a secondary analysis of 37 qualitative interviews undertaken across the UK with 36 women and nine of their male partners (eight couples were interviewed together) who talked about diagnostic testing for foetal abnormality in 55 pregnancies. When describing their decisions, respondents referred to examples of knowledge gleaned from their own and other individuals' experiences as well as information based on biomedical or clinical-epidemiological research (usually about the probabilities of having a child affected by health problems or the probability of diagnostic tests causing miscarriage). Both forms of knowledge were employed in people's accounts to illustrate the legitimacy and internal coherence of decisions taken. The analysis demonstrates the personally idiosyncratic ways that people reflect on and incorporate different types of information to add meaning to abstract ideas about risk, to imagine the consequences for their own lives and to help them to make sense of the decisions they faced.

KW - personal experience

KW - prenatal diagnosis

KW - decision making

KW - reproductive behaviour

KW - pregnancy

KW - patient decision making

KW - health knowledge

KW - UK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952009684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.031

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.031

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 755

EP - 762

JO - Social Science & Medicine

JF - Social Science & Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 5

ER -