Imitation and the effort of learning

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Abstract

Central to Hurley's argument is the position that imitation is "automatic" and requires inhibition. The evidence for this is poor. Imitation is intentional, involves active comparison between self and other and involves new learning to improve self-other likeness. Abnormal imitation behaviour may result from impaired learning rather than disinhibition. Mentalizing may be similarly effortful and dependent upon learning about others.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-41
Number of pages2
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2008

Keywords

  • movement

Cite this

Imitation and the effort of learning. / Williams, Justin H. G.

In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 31, No. 1, 02.2008, p. 40-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

@article{c8da3957991e4740bfa60cd8bcc97581,
title = "Imitation and the effort of learning",
abstract = "Central to Hurley's argument is the position that imitation is {"}automatic{"} and requires inhibition. The evidence for this is poor. Imitation is intentional, involves active comparison between self and other and involves new learning to improve self-other likeness. Abnormal imitation behaviour may result from impaired learning rather than disinhibition. Mentalizing may be similarly effortful and dependent upon learning about others.",
keywords = "movement",
author = "Williams, {Justin H. G.}",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1017/S0140525X07003329",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "40--41",
journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
issn = "0140-525X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imitation and the effort of learning

AU - Williams, Justin H. G.

PY - 2008/2

Y1 - 2008/2

N2 - Central to Hurley's argument is the position that imitation is "automatic" and requires inhibition. The evidence for this is poor. Imitation is intentional, involves active comparison between self and other and involves new learning to improve self-other likeness. Abnormal imitation behaviour may result from impaired learning rather than disinhibition. Mentalizing may be similarly effortful and dependent upon learning about others.

AB - Central to Hurley's argument is the position that imitation is "automatic" and requires inhibition. The evidence for this is poor. Imitation is intentional, involves active comparison between self and other and involves new learning to improve self-other likeness. Abnormal imitation behaviour may result from impaired learning rather than disinhibition. Mentalizing may be similarly effortful and dependent upon learning about others.

KW - movement

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X07003329

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X07003329

M3 - Editorial

VL - 31

SP - 40

EP - 41

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

IS - 1

ER -