Impact on hypertension control of a patient-held guideline: a randomised controlled trial

B. McKinstry, J. Hanley, David James Heaney, L. McCloughan, R. Elton, D. Webb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background

Hypertension is generally poorly controlled in primary care. One possible intervention for improving control is the harnessing of patient expertise through education and encouragement to challenge their care.

Aim

To determine whether encouraging patients to manage their hypertension in an 'expert' manner, by providing them with information in a clear clinical guideline, coupled with an explicit exhortation to become involved in and to challenge their own care if appropriate, would improve their care.

Design of study

Single blind randomised controlled trial of detailed guideline versus standard information.

Setting

Single urban general practice over 1 year.

Method

Patient-held guideline with written explicit exhortation to challenge care when appropriate. Two hundred and ninety-four of 536 eligible patients on the practice hypertension register were recruited, all of whom were randomised into one of two groups. Two hundred and thirty-six patients completed the study.

Results

Primary outcome: average systolic blood pressure. Secondary outcomes: proportion of patients with blood pressure <150mmHg systolic and <90mmHg diastolic, average cholesterol, proportion of patients prescribed statins and aspirin according to guideline, hospital anxiety and depression score. No clinically, or statistically significant differences were found between intervention and control with respect to all parameters or in anxiety and depression levels. Statin and aspirin use improved throughout the course of the study in both groups. Statin use showed a trend (P = 0.02) in favour of control.

Conclusion

In this study there was no clinically significant perceived benefit to patients as a result of providing them with a hypertension guideline. Patient guidelines are currently planned for many chronic illnesses. It is important to determine the utility of such interventions before scarce resources are applied to them.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)842-847
Number of pages5
JournalThe British Journal of General Practice
Volume56
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2006

Keywords

  • clinical trials
  • hypertension
  • physician-patient relations
  • primary health care
  • self-care
  • SELF-MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
  • CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE
  • GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS
  • RISK-FACTORS
  • SOCIETY
  • ADULTS

Cite this

McKinstry, B., Hanley, J., Heaney, D. J., McCloughan, L., Elton, R., & Webb, D. (2006). Impact on hypertension control of a patient-held guideline: a randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of General Practice, 56, 842-847.

Impact on hypertension control of a patient-held guideline: a randomised controlled trial. / McKinstry, B.; Hanley, J.; Heaney, David James; McCloughan, L.; Elton, R.; Webb, D.

In: The British Journal of General Practice, Vol. 56, 11.2006, p. 842-847.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McKinstry, B, Hanley, J, Heaney, DJ, McCloughan, L, Elton, R & Webb, D 2006, 'Impact on hypertension control of a patient-held guideline: a randomised controlled trial', The British Journal of General Practice, vol. 56, pp. 842-847.
McKinstry B, Hanley J, Heaney DJ, McCloughan L, Elton R, Webb D. Impact on hypertension control of a patient-held guideline: a randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of General Practice. 2006 Nov;56:842-847.
McKinstry, B. ; Hanley, J. ; Heaney, David James ; McCloughan, L. ; Elton, R. ; Webb, D. / Impact on hypertension control of a patient-held guideline: a randomised controlled trial. In: The British Journal of General Practice. 2006 ; Vol. 56. pp. 842-847.
@article{d13b3467bfa2439ca6d14e9b62f44243,
title = "Impact on hypertension control of a patient-held guideline: a randomised controlled trial",
abstract = "BackgroundHypertension is generally poorly controlled in primary care. One possible intervention for improving control is the harnessing of patient expertise through education and encouragement to challenge their care.AimTo determine whether encouraging patients to manage their hypertension in an 'expert' manner, by providing them with information in a clear clinical guideline, coupled with an explicit exhortation to become involved in and to challenge their own care if appropriate, would improve their care.Design of studySingle blind randomised controlled trial of detailed guideline versus standard information.SettingSingle urban general practice over 1 year.MethodPatient-held guideline with written explicit exhortation to challenge care when appropriate. Two hundred and ninety-four of 536 eligible patients on the practice hypertension register were recruited, all of whom were randomised into one of two groups. Two hundred and thirty-six patients completed the study.ResultsPrimary outcome: average systolic blood pressure. Secondary outcomes: proportion of patients with blood pressure <150mmHg systolic and <90mmHg diastolic, average cholesterol, proportion of patients prescribed statins and aspirin according to guideline, hospital anxiety and depression score. No clinically, or statistically significant differences were found between intervention and control with respect to all parameters or in anxiety and depression levels. Statin and aspirin use improved throughout the course of the study in both groups. Statin use showed a trend (P = 0.02) in favour of control.ConclusionIn this study there was no clinically significant perceived benefit to patients as a result of providing them with a hypertension guideline. Patient guidelines are currently planned for many chronic illnesses. It is important to determine the utility of such interventions before scarce resources are applied to them.",
keywords = "clinical trials, hypertension, physician-patient relations, primary health care, self-care, SELF-MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE, GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS, RISK-FACTORS, SOCIETY, ADULTS",
author = "B. McKinstry and J. Hanley and Heaney, {David James} and L. McCloughan and R. Elton and D. Webb",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "842--847",
journal = "The British Journal of General Practice",
issn = "0960-1643",
publisher = "Royal College of General Practitioners",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact on hypertension control of a patient-held guideline: a randomised controlled trial

AU - McKinstry, B.

AU - Hanley, J.

AU - Heaney, David James

AU - McCloughan, L.

AU - Elton, R.

AU - Webb, D.

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - BackgroundHypertension is generally poorly controlled in primary care. One possible intervention for improving control is the harnessing of patient expertise through education and encouragement to challenge their care.AimTo determine whether encouraging patients to manage their hypertension in an 'expert' manner, by providing them with information in a clear clinical guideline, coupled with an explicit exhortation to become involved in and to challenge their own care if appropriate, would improve their care.Design of studySingle blind randomised controlled trial of detailed guideline versus standard information.SettingSingle urban general practice over 1 year.MethodPatient-held guideline with written explicit exhortation to challenge care when appropriate. Two hundred and ninety-four of 536 eligible patients on the practice hypertension register were recruited, all of whom were randomised into one of two groups. Two hundred and thirty-six patients completed the study.ResultsPrimary outcome: average systolic blood pressure. Secondary outcomes: proportion of patients with blood pressure <150mmHg systolic and <90mmHg diastolic, average cholesterol, proportion of patients prescribed statins and aspirin according to guideline, hospital anxiety and depression score. No clinically, or statistically significant differences were found between intervention and control with respect to all parameters or in anxiety and depression levels. Statin and aspirin use improved throughout the course of the study in both groups. Statin use showed a trend (P = 0.02) in favour of control.ConclusionIn this study there was no clinically significant perceived benefit to patients as a result of providing them with a hypertension guideline. Patient guidelines are currently planned for many chronic illnesses. It is important to determine the utility of such interventions before scarce resources are applied to them.

AB - BackgroundHypertension is generally poorly controlled in primary care. One possible intervention for improving control is the harnessing of patient expertise through education and encouragement to challenge their care.AimTo determine whether encouraging patients to manage their hypertension in an 'expert' manner, by providing them with information in a clear clinical guideline, coupled with an explicit exhortation to become involved in and to challenge their own care if appropriate, would improve their care.Design of studySingle blind randomised controlled trial of detailed guideline versus standard information.SettingSingle urban general practice over 1 year.MethodPatient-held guideline with written explicit exhortation to challenge care when appropriate. Two hundred and ninety-four of 536 eligible patients on the practice hypertension register were recruited, all of whom were randomised into one of two groups. Two hundred and thirty-six patients completed the study.ResultsPrimary outcome: average systolic blood pressure. Secondary outcomes: proportion of patients with blood pressure <150mmHg systolic and <90mmHg diastolic, average cholesterol, proportion of patients prescribed statins and aspirin according to guideline, hospital anxiety and depression score. No clinically, or statistically significant differences were found between intervention and control with respect to all parameters or in anxiety and depression levels. Statin and aspirin use improved throughout the course of the study in both groups. Statin use showed a trend (P = 0.02) in favour of control.ConclusionIn this study there was no clinically significant perceived benefit to patients as a result of providing them with a hypertension guideline. Patient guidelines are currently planned for many chronic illnesses. It is important to determine the utility of such interventions before scarce resources are applied to them.

KW - clinical trials

KW - hypertension

KW - physician-patient relations

KW - primary health care

KW - self-care

KW - SELF-MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

KW - CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE

KW - GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS

KW - RISK-FACTORS

KW - SOCIETY

KW - ADULTS

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 842

EP - 847

JO - The British Journal of General Practice

JF - The British Journal of General Practice

SN - 0960-1643

ER -