“In Building a Nation few better examples can be found”: Norden and the Scottish Parliament

Andrew G Newby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Following the reconstitution of the Scottish Parliament in 1999, after a hiatus of over three centuries, the development of links with the Nordic countries was presented as a strategic priority, and Scotland was apparently accepted by the Nordic Council as a part of the 'West Nordic Sphere'. Politicians and social commentators in Scotland - though not necessarily the majority of the electorate - have shown an ongoing fascination with their Scandinavian neighbours, for a variety of reasons. The Nordic Council itself, for example, has been held up as an example of how post-devolution Britain could renegotiate insular relationships to reflect a partnership of roughly equal interests. Images of Nordic society, often idealized, permeate political discourse much more deeply than the discussion of constitutional arrangements, however, and the advent in 2007 of Scotland's first SNP administration has, if anything, raised the profile of Scandinavia still further. This paper will highlight some of the ways in which Sweden, Norway and other Nordic states have been utilized as examples for Scotland to follow, during three broad time periods: (i) pre-1997; (ii) 1997-2007; (iii) since May 2007, when the SNP took power in Scotland for the first time. Further, it will argue that several paradoxes can be discerned, as this general discourse is based on (i) cherry-picking issues and (ii) a certain view of a 'Nordic model' that erases internal differences within Norden and debates within its constituent states.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)307-329
Number of pages23
JournalScandinavian Journal of History
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

Parliament
Scotland
Scandinavia
Sweden
Hiatus
Neighbors
Devolution
Constituent
Politicians
Nordic Countries
Commentators
Political Discourse
Discourse
Paradox
Arrangement
Norway

Keywords

  • Scotland
  • Scandinavia
  • Nordic
  • Norway
  • Sweden

Cite this

“In Building a Nation few better examples can be found” : Norden and the Scottish Parliament. / Newby, Andrew G.

In: Scandinavian Journal of History, Vol. 34, No. 3, 09.2009, p. 307-329.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d4559bb151d848f6a962dfacdbb7a54d,
title = "“In Building a Nation few better examples can be found”: Norden and the Scottish Parliament",
abstract = "Following the reconstitution of the Scottish Parliament in 1999, after a hiatus of over three centuries, the development of links with the Nordic countries was presented as a strategic priority, and Scotland was apparently accepted by the Nordic Council as a part of the 'West Nordic Sphere'. Politicians and social commentators in Scotland - though not necessarily the majority of the electorate - have shown an ongoing fascination with their Scandinavian neighbours, for a variety of reasons. The Nordic Council itself, for example, has been held up as an example of how post-devolution Britain could renegotiate insular relationships to reflect a partnership of roughly equal interests. Images of Nordic society, often idealized, permeate political discourse much more deeply than the discussion of constitutional arrangements, however, and the advent in 2007 of Scotland's first SNP administration has, if anything, raised the profile of Scandinavia still further. This paper will highlight some of the ways in which Sweden, Norway and other Nordic states have been utilized as examples for Scotland to follow, during three broad time periods: (i) pre-1997; (ii) 1997-2007; (iii) since May 2007, when the SNP took power in Scotland for the first time. Further, it will argue that several paradoxes can be discerned, as this general discourse is based on (i) cherry-picking issues and (ii) a certain view of a 'Nordic model' that erases internal differences within Norden and debates within its constituent states.",
keywords = "Scotland, Scandinavia, Nordic , Norway, Sweden",
author = "Newby, {Andrew G}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1080/03468750903134749",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "307--329",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of History",
issn = "0346-8755",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis AS",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “In Building a Nation few better examples can be found”

T2 - Norden and the Scottish Parliament

AU - Newby, Andrew G

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - Following the reconstitution of the Scottish Parliament in 1999, after a hiatus of over three centuries, the development of links with the Nordic countries was presented as a strategic priority, and Scotland was apparently accepted by the Nordic Council as a part of the 'West Nordic Sphere'. Politicians and social commentators in Scotland - though not necessarily the majority of the electorate - have shown an ongoing fascination with their Scandinavian neighbours, for a variety of reasons. The Nordic Council itself, for example, has been held up as an example of how post-devolution Britain could renegotiate insular relationships to reflect a partnership of roughly equal interests. Images of Nordic society, often idealized, permeate political discourse much more deeply than the discussion of constitutional arrangements, however, and the advent in 2007 of Scotland's first SNP administration has, if anything, raised the profile of Scandinavia still further. This paper will highlight some of the ways in which Sweden, Norway and other Nordic states have been utilized as examples for Scotland to follow, during three broad time periods: (i) pre-1997; (ii) 1997-2007; (iii) since May 2007, when the SNP took power in Scotland for the first time. Further, it will argue that several paradoxes can be discerned, as this general discourse is based on (i) cherry-picking issues and (ii) a certain view of a 'Nordic model' that erases internal differences within Norden and debates within its constituent states.

AB - Following the reconstitution of the Scottish Parliament in 1999, after a hiatus of over three centuries, the development of links with the Nordic countries was presented as a strategic priority, and Scotland was apparently accepted by the Nordic Council as a part of the 'West Nordic Sphere'. Politicians and social commentators in Scotland - though not necessarily the majority of the electorate - have shown an ongoing fascination with their Scandinavian neighbours, for a variety of reasons. The Nordic Council itself, for example, has been held up as an example of how post-devolution Britain could renegotiate insular relationships to reflect a partnership of roughly equal interests. Images of Nordic society, often idealized, permeate political discourse much more deeply than the discussion of constitutional arrangements, however, and the advent in 2007 of Scotland's first SNP administration has, if anything, raised the profile of Scandinavia still further. This paper will highlight some of the ways in which Sweden, Norway and other Nordic states have been utilized as examples for Scotland to follow, during three broad time periods: (i) pre-1997; (ii) 1997-2007; (iii) since May 2007, when the SNP took power in Scotland for the first time. Further, it will argue that several paradoxes can be discerned, as this general discourse is based on (i) cherry-picking issues and (ii) a certain view of a 'Nordic model' that erases internal differences within Norden and debates within its constituent states.

KW - Scotland

KW - Scandinavia

KW - Nordic

KW - Norway

KW - Sweden

U2 - 10.1080/03468750903134749

DO - 10.1080/03468750903134749

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 307

EP - 329

JO - Scandinavian Journal of History

JF - Scandinavian Journal of History

SN - 0346-8755

IS - 3

ER -