In defence of the CISG

Christopher Kee, Edgardo Munoz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this article, the authors respond to certain criticisms made against the 1980 Vienna Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (the 'CISG') and explain what they perceive as the shortcomings of, and impediments to, a particular model of a proposed new global code. A goal of both the CISG and the proposed global code is to create an environment which promotes international trade. Predictability in the law is a fundamental element to achieve such an environment. The CISG has been criticised as failing to provide such predictability. It has been suggested that it has not been uniformly interpreted, contains internal inconsistencies and allows countries to establish varying mini-codes. While there may be some merit in some of these criticisms there is also much that is overstated and wrong. The CISG may not be a perfect instrument. However, it has been widely accepted and that alone makes it a strong basis from which to develop. A global code applied with absolute uniformity throughout the world might provide predictability. However, such a uniform law is unrealistic and, in any event, undesirable. The authors propose a more realistic solution. The law should be the framework upon which individually nuanced contracts could be built. Predictability is obtained by developing and establishing avenues of communication. It is also obtained by developing and establishing means of explaining and understanding the concepts upon which the framework has been built. The CISG allows for all of this.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)99-123
Number of pages25
JournalDeakin Law Review
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Law
criticism
Vienna
sale
world trade
event
communication

Keywords

  • sale of goods
  • CISG
  • Vienna sales convention
  • United Nations convention on contracts for the international sale of goods

Cite this

In defence of the CISG. / Kee, Christopher; Munoz, Edgardo.

In: Deakin Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2009, p. 99-123.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kee, C & Munoz, E 2009, 'In defence of the CISG', Deakin Law Review, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 99-123. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2009vol14no1art133
Kee, Christopher ; Munoz, Edgardo. / In defence of the CISG. In: Deakin Law Review. 2009 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 99-123.
@article{b7156d5e8d864eae8cd9bae786fae163,
title = "In defence of the CISG",
abstract = "In this article, the authors respond to certain criticisms made against the 1980 Vienna Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (the 'CISG') and explain what they perceive as the shortcomings of, and impediments to, a particular model of a proposed new global code. A goal of both the CISG and the proposed global code is to create an environment which promotes international trade. Predictability in the law is a fundamental element to achieve such an environment. The CISG has been criticised as failing to provide such predictability. It has been suggested that it has not been uniformly interpreted, contains internal inconsistencies and allows countries to establish varying mini-codes. While there may be some merit in some of these criticisms there is also much that is overstated and wrong. The CISG may not be a perfect instrument. However, it has been widely accepted and that alone makes it a strong basis from which to develop. A global code applied with absolute uniformity throughout the world might provide predictability. However, such a uniform law is unrealistic and, in any event, undesirable. The authors propose a more realistic solution. The law should be the framework upon which individually nuanced contracts could be built. Predictability is obtained by developing and establishing avenues of communication. It is also obtained by developing and establishing means of explaining and understanding the concepts upon which the framework has been built. The CISG allows for all of this.",
keywords = "sale of goods, CISG, Vienna sales convention, United Nations convention on contracts for the international sale of goods",
author = "Christopher Kee and Edgardo Munoz",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.21153/dlr2009vol14no1art133",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "99--123",
journal = "Deakin Law Review",
issn = "1835-9264",
publisher = "Deakin University",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In defence of the CISG

AU - Kee, Christopher

AU - Munoz, Edgardo

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - In this article, the authors respond to certain criticisms made against the 1980 Vienna Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (the 'CISG') and explain what they perceive as the shortcomings of, and impediments to, a particular model of a proposed new global code. A goal of both the CISG and the proposed global code is to create an environment which promotes international trade. Predictability in the law is a fundamental element to achieve such an environment. The CISG has been criticised as failing to provide such predictability. It has been suggested that it has not been uniformly interpreted, contains internal inconsistencies and allows countries to establish varying mini-codes. While there may be some merit in some of these criticisms there is also much that is overstated and wrong. The CISG may not be a perfect instrument. However, it has been widely accepted and that alone makes it a strong basis from which to develop. A global code applied with absolute uniformity throughout the world might provide predictability. However, such a uniform law is unrealistic and, in any event, undesirable. The authors propose a more realistic solution. The law should be the framework upon which individually nuanced contracts could be built. Predictability is obtained by developing and establishing avenues of communication. It is also obtained by developing and establishing means of explaining and understanding the concepts upon which the framework has been built. The CISG allows for all of this.

AB - In this article, the authors respond to certain criticisms made against the 1980 Vienna Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (the 'CISG') and explain what they perceive as the shortcomings of, and impediments to, a particular model of a proposed new global code. A goal of both the CISG and the proposed global code is to create an environment which promotes international trade. Predictability in the law is a fundamental element to achieve such an environment. The CISG has been criticised as failing to provide such predictability. It has been suggested that it has not been uniformly interpreted, contains internal inconsistencies and allows countries to establish varying mini-codes. While there may be some merit in some of these criticisms there is also much that is overstated and wrong. The CISG may not be a perfect instrument. However, it has been widely accepted and that alone makes it a strong basis from which to develop. A global code applied with absolute uniformity throughout the world might provide predictability. However, such a uniform law is unrealistic and, in any event, undesirable. The authors propose a more realistic solution. The law should be the framework upon which individually nuanced contracts could be built. Predictability is obtained by developing and establishing avenues of communication. It is also obtained by developing and establishing means of explaining and understanding the concepts upon which the framework has been built. The CISG allows for all of this.

KW - sale of goods

KW - CISG

KW - Vienna sales convention

KW - United Nations convention on contracts for the international sale of goods

U2 - 10.21153/dlr2009vol14no1art133

DO - 10.21153/dlr2009vol14no1art133

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 99

EP - 123

JO - Deakin Law Review

JF - Deakin Law Review

SN - 1835-9264

IS - 1

ER -