Inaccuracies in routinely collected Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) maturity data and correction using a gonadosomatic index model

Lindsay Rhona McPherson, Konstantinos Ganias, Tara Marshall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Macroscopic maturity staging data are widely used to distinguish between reproductive and non-reproductive individuals. The implicit assumption is that these data are accurate. The accuracy of macroscopic maturity staging of North Sea herring (Clupea harengus) has not been checked since the macroscopic scale was produced in 1961. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of macroscopic maturity staging of female North Sea herring by comparison to histological staging and the gonadosomatic index (GSI). Ovary samples were collected during the North Sea Herring Acoustic Survey in 2006 onboard FRV Scotia (Scotland) and in 2007 onboard FRV Scotia and RV Johan Hjort (Norway). Commercial samples were also collected by Marine Scotland, Aberdeen in both years. The maturity staging error was relatively low in 2006 (21% error) but was much higher onboard FRV Scotia (57%) and RV Johan Hjort (47%) in 2007. There was estimated to be a 27% under-estimation of the SSB in 2007due to the differences in the proportion mature but no change in SSB estimates in 2006. GSI cut-off scores, estimated by means of multinomial regression models were successfully able to separate immature females from both mature-active and recovering females; however, there was some overlap between the mature-active and recovering individuals. We conclude that an effective and low-cost means of reducing error in herring maturity studies is the combined use of a four-point macroscopic maturity scale with routinely collected GSI data, the latter acting to validate and fine tune macroscopic staging.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1477-1487
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom
Volume91
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Clupea harengus
gonadosomatic index
herring
Agrotis
North Sea
Scotland
acoustic survey
Norway
acoustics
immatures
cost
sampling
index
sea

Keywords

  • Atlantic herring
  • fisheries management

Cite this

Inaccuracies in routinely collected Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) maturity data and correction using a gonadosomatic index model. / McPherson, Lindsay Rhona; Ganias, Konstantinos; Marshall, Tara.

In: Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, Vol. 91, No. 7, 2011, p. 1477-1487.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6a5c52b6079a4266bd2214f254d8ca73,
title = "Inaccuracies in routinely collected Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) maturity data and correction using a gonadosomatic index model",
abstract = "Macroscopic maturity staging data are widely used to distinguish between reproductive and non-reproductive individuals. The implicit assumption is that these data are accurate. The accuracy of macroscopic maturity staging of North Sea herring (Clupea harengus) has not been checked since the macroscopic scale was produced in 1961. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of macroscopic maturity staging of female North Sea herring by comparison to histological staging and the gonadosomatic index (GSI). Ovary samples were collected during the North Sea Herring Acoustic Survey in 2006 onboard FRV Scotia (Scotland) and in 2007 onboard FRV Scotia and RV Johan Hjort (Norway). Commercial samples were also collected by Marine Scotland, Aberdeen in both years. The maturity staging error was relatively low in 2006 (21{\%} error) but was much higher onboard FRV Scotia (57{\%}) and RV Johan Hjort (47{\%}) in 2007. There was estimated to be a 27{\%} under-estimation of the SSB in 2007due to the differences in the proportion mature but no change in SSB estimates in 2006. GSI cut-off scores, estimated by means of multinomial regression models were successfully able to separate immature females from both mature-active and recovering females; however, there was some overlap between the mature-active and recovering individuals. We conclude that an effective and low-cost means of reducing error in herring maturity studies is the combined use of a four-point macroscopic maturity scale with routinely collected GSI data, the latter acting to validate and fine tune macroscopic staging.",
keywords = "Atlantic herring, fisheries management",
author = "McPherson, {Lindsay Rhona} and Konstantinos Ganias and Tara Marshall",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1017/S002531541100018X",
language = "English",
volume = "91",
pages = "1477--1487",
journal = "Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom",
issn = "0025-3154",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inaccuracies in routinely collected Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) maturity data and correction using a gonadosomatic index model

AU - McPherson, Lindsay Rhona

AU - Ganias, Konstantinos

AU - Marshall, Tara

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Macroscopic maturity staging data are widely used to distinguish between reproductive and non-reproductive individuals. The implicit assumption is that these data are accurate. The accuracy of macroscopic maturity staging of North Sea herring (Clupea harengus) has not been checked since the macroscopic scale was produced in 1961. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of macroscopic maturity staging of female North Sea herring by comparison to histological staging and the gonadosomatic index (GSI). Ovary samples were collected during the North Sea Herring Acoustic Survey in 2006 onboard FRV Scotia (Scotland) and in 2007 onboard FRV Scotia and RV Johan Hjort (Norway). Commercial samples were also collected by Marine Scotland, Aberdeen in both years. The maturity staging error was relatively low in 2006 (21% error) but was much higher onboard FRV Scotia (57%) and RV Johan Hjort (47%) in 2007. There was estimated to be a 27% under-estimation of the SSB in 2007due to the differences in the proportion mature but no change in SSB estimates in 2006. GSI cut-off scores, estimated by means of multinomial regression models were successfully able to separate immature females from both mature-active and recovering females; however, there was some overlap between the mature-active and recovering individuals. We conclude that an effective and low-cost means of reducing error in herring maturity studies is the combined use of a four-point macroscopic maturity scale with routinely collected GSI data, the latter acting to validate and fine tune macroscopic staging.

AB - Macroscopic maturity staging data are widely used to distinguish between reproductive and non-reproductive individuals. The implicit assumption is that these data are accurate. The accuracy of macroscopic maturity staging of North Sea herring (Clupea harengus) has not been checked since the macroscopic scale was produced in 1961. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of macroscopic maturity staging of female North Sea herring by comparison to histological staging and the gonadosomatic index (GSI). Ovary samples were collected during the North Sea Herring Acoustic Survey in 2006 onboard FRV Scotia (Scotland) and in 2007 onboard FRV Scotia and RV Johan Hjort (Norway). Commercial samples were also collected by Marine Scotland, Aberdeen in both years. The maturity staging error was relatively low in 2006 (21% error) but was much higher onboard FRV Scotia (57%) and RV Johan Hjort (47%) in 2007. There was estimated to be a 27% under-estimation of the SSB in 2007due to the differences in the proportion mature but no change in SSB estimates in 2006. GSI cut-off scores, estimated by means of multinomial regression models were successfully able to separate immature females from both mature-active and recovering females; however, there was some overlap between the mature-active and recovering individuals. We conclude that an effective and low-cost means of reducing error in herring maturity studies is the combined use of a four-point macroscopic maturity scale with routinely collected GSI data, the latter acting to validate and fine tune macroscopic staging.

KW - Atlantic herring

KW - fisheries management

U2 - 10.1017/S002531541100018X

DO - 10.1017/S002531541100018X

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 1477

EP - 1487

JO - Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

JF - Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

SN - 0025-3154

IS - 7

ER -